Loading...
Loading...
Found 39 Skills
General Bugfix Workflow Knowledge Base, including TDD process, output format specifications, confidence scoring standards, and general best practices. Applicable to all tech stacks (backend/frontend/e2e).
Reads documented bugs from bugs.md, analyzes root causes, implements fixes with regression tests, and validates the full test suite. Prioritizes fixes by severity (high to low). Updates bugs.md with correction status and generates a final bugfix report. Use when the user asks to fix bugs, resolve issues, or run the bugfix workflow for a feature. Do not use for new feature implementation, code review, or QA testing.
Fix confirmed bugs from user reports, runtime failures, failing tests, or verified `/find-bugs` findings. Reproduce the bug first, diagnose the real root cause, apply the smallest correct fix, verify against regressions, and report exactly what changed. Loads framework-specific references and category-specific playbooks as needed. Use when the user says "fix this bug", "fix the findings", "/bugfix", or asks to repair a confirmed defect.
Fix only small, high-certainty OpenClaw bugs from a pasted issue/PR list after deep code review.
Fix a known bug in the Rock RMS codebase. Guides Claude through root cause analysis, minimal correct fix, and a release-note commit message. Use when the user says "fix this bug", "bugfix", "this is broken", "debug this", describes a bug with file paths or issue numbers, or pastes an error/stack trace with intent to fix. Also use when a bug is found by another skill (e.g. /review-conversion, /check) and the user wants it fixed. Do NOT use for: finding bugs (use /check or /review-conversion), adding features, or refactoring.
Fix the findings recorded in a crate issue file one at a time, with failing test first, minimal fix second, full crate verification third, and issue-file status updates after each successful fix. Use for Rust crate issue lists that already exist and need disciplined sequential repair.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "fix a bug with minimal changes", "analyze change scope for a bugfix", "find the minimal set of files to change", "do a focused bugfix", or "scope a minimal repair".
Persistent memory discipline for Engram contributors. Trigger: Decisions, bugfixes, discoveries, preferences, or session closure.
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Test-driven development via red-green-refactor with an auditable commit protocol. Use when implementing any feature, bugfix, refactor, or behavior change before writing implementation code, or when the user mentions TDD, red-green-refactor, or test-first development.
Write the test first, watch it fail, then write the least code that passes. Covers where the test belongs, what makes it honest, what a passing test proves and what it does not, recovering when code was written before the test, and starting a bug fix from a red run. A test nobody watched fail proves nothing. Use when implementing a feature or a bugfix, when a test was written after the code, when a test passes the first time you run it, or when the user says "write tests for this", "add coverage", or "TDD this". Not for judging tests inside a change under review, and not for choosing a test framework.
File or link CawPlan defects from failed/blocked TestRail Results via QA Insights A4. Use when: SQA wants to turn a TestRail Failed/Blocked Result into a CawPlan Ticket, paste a tests/view URL to file a defect, review an A4 defect draft, create a BUGFIX/FEATURE ticket, or link an existing ticket back to TestRail defects. Cold start with tests/view MUST call execution failures --test-id BEFORE defects draft; never use test_id as the draft path result_id. A4 write path (create-ticket) MUST use --body-file or --body JSON — never field flags like --description or --result-id. NOT for: importing test cases (use `cawplan-testcase-import`); creating TestRail Plans/Runs (use `cawplan-testplan-layout`); release risk assessment; generating requirements or test points.