Loading...
Loading...
Found 8 Skills
Verifies code implements exactly what documentation specifies for blockchain audits. Use when comparing code against whitepapers, finding gaps between specs and implementation, or performing compliance checks for protocol implementations.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing ones, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to latest code status)/ `check` (review without modification, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-objectives: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `codestable/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down this module structure", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when an architecture action is required before proceeding during the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phases.
Conduct an architecture health check on a design — either verify if the design is internally consistent (no conflicts between terminology, contracts, and implementation steps) or check if the design aligns with the code (ensuring what was promised in the design is actually implemented in code). This skill only outputs issue lists and repair suggestions, and does not make any modifications. It focuses on only one target each time; "顺手把另一项也查了" is not allowed. Trigger scenarios: Users say "perform architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan align with the code?", or want to conduct a health check before proceeding to the implement/acceptance phase.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing architecture documents, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to the latest code status)/ `check` (view only, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-goals: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `easysdd/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down the structure of this module", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when it is found in the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phase that an architecture action needs to be performed first before proceeding.
Decompose research ideas into atomic, self-contained concepts with bidirectional math-code mapping. For each concept, extract the math formula from papers and find code implementations. Use for complex system papers requiring formal grounding.
Takes an existing component, file, or CSS and rewrites it to match the project's extracted design soul in .marrow.md. Fixes all soul violations while preserving the component's structure, logic, and functionality. Use this skill when the user wants to fix a specific file to match the design soul, align existing code to marrow rules, or repair soul violations found by marrow-check. Triggers on: /marrow-align, or prompts like "align this to marrow", "fix this to match the soul", "make this match .marrow.md", "fix the soul violations in this file", "align this component", "marrow-align [filename]". Requires .marrow.md to exist. If not found, instructs user to run /marrow first.
Weed the Allium garden. Find where Allium specifications and implementation code have diverged, and help resolve the divergences. Use when the user wants to check spec-code alignment, compare specs against implementation, audit for spec drift or violations, sync specs with code or code with specs, or verify whether the implementation matches what the spec says.
Review an implemented .plan.md by executing the instructions in its