Loading...
Loading...
Found 12 Skills
Unified codebase quality review: merge readiness verdict + maintainability (Clean Code) + docs-vs-code consistency. Use for code review, quality check, refactor check, outdated docs check, or merge/production readiness.
Execute development tasks with skeleton-first approach and layered TDD. Includes optional adversarial verification (code quality + test completeness review). Use when users start working on a task (T-XX), need development guidance, or implement features/bugfixes. Triggers on keywords like "execute task", "start T-XX", "implement", "develop", "开发任务", "执行任务", "对抗式验证", "--review".
Use when reviewing a plan before implementation begins. Not for autonomous plan analysis — use plan-review agent instead. Challenges scope, walks through architecture/quality/tests/performance interactively with mandatory user checkpoints and opinionated recommendations.
Review changed code for reuse opportunities, quality issues, and inefficiencies using three parallel review agents, then fix any issues found. Triggers when the user says "simplify", "clean up the code", "review the changes", or after run-plan execution when code quality verification is needed.
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
Performs comprehensive codebase audit checking architecture, tech debt, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, documentation, dependencies, and maintainability. Use when auditing a project, assessing codebase health, running security scans, checking for vulnerabilities, reviewing code quality, analyzing tech debt, or asked to audit/analyze the entire codebase.
Review the code quality of a spec-driven change. Checks readability, security, performance, and best practices before archiving.
MUST be used whenever reviewing a Dune app for code quality, maintainability, or clean code issues — before a PR review, after a feature is complete, or when the user asks for a code review. Do NOT skip linting steps. Triggers: code quality, code review, clean code, refactor, maintainability, technical debt, any type, naming, dead code, duplication, DRY, single responsibility, component size, lint, linting, TypeScript strict, dependency injection, file structure.
一个全面、结构化的特性开发工作流程，包含代码库探索、架构设计、质量审查和实现等专门阶段。在构建需要以下条件的新特性时使用：（1）在做出更改之前了解现有代码库，（2）通过系统性的提问澄清模糊的需求，（3）在实现之前设计周到的架构，（4）通过多维度的代码审查确保质量。非常适合涉及多个文件、需要架构决策、包含复杂集成或需求有些不明确的功能特性。
面向团队工作流的子代理开发技能（阶段3）。基于已批准的计划，按任务派发子代理实现，并执行“规格合规→代码质量”双阶段审查，必要时同步 Jira 子任务状态。
Automated tooling and detection patterns for JavaScript/TypeScript code quality review
Pre-commit code quality review workflow. Use before committing changes to verify code quality, security, testing coverage, and adherence to project conventions. Supports both automated checking and interactive review modes.