Loading...
Loading...
Found 86 Skills
Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing. Informed by quality engineers with 15+ years experience across FDA, IATF 16949, and AS9100 environments. Includes NCR lifecycle management, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, and audit methodology. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.
Implement a conformance-test runner script (Bash on macOS/Linux, PowerShell on Windows) for an arbitrary programming language, in one of two variants: install-inline (when no prepare_environment_<lang> script exists) or activate-only (when one does). Use when the user wants to add a conformance-test runner for a new language (Node.js, Go, Rust, Flutter, etc.) to a ***plain project, or wants to regenerate / adapt one of the existing runners.
Progressive enhancement form validation with Conform and Zod for Remix applications - type-safe forms that work without JavaScript
Resolve Swift concurrency compiler errors, adopt Swift 6.2 approachable concurrency (SE-0466), and write data-race-safe async code. Use when fixing Sendable conformance errors, actor isolation warnings, or strict concurrency diagnostics; when adopting default MainActor isolation, @concurrent, nonisolated(nonsending), or Task.immediate; when designing actor-based architectures, structured concurrency with TaskGroup, or background work offloading; or when migrating from @preconcurrency to full Swift 6 strict concurrency.
Swift Concurrency patterns — async/await, actors, tasks, Sendable conformance. Use when writing async/await code, implementing actors, working with structured concurrency, or ensuring data race safety.
iLEAP technical specs for exchanging logistics emissions data (ISO 14083 / GLEC Framework) via the PACT protocol. Use when implementing iLEAP APIs, data models (ShipmentFootprint, TCE, TOC, HOC, TAD), PACT DataModelExtensions, or conformance testing. Language-agnostic.
Reviews code for quality — architecture conformance, anti-patterns, performance issues, maintainability. Read-only analysis that detects circular dependencies, N+1 queries, dead code, naming violations, and layering breaches. Use when the user asks for a code review, wants feedback on code quality, PR review, tech debt analysis, or architecture conformance checks.
Standalone quality review for Elastic integrations. Classifies files by domain, loads domain-specific skills and review checklists, applies cross-domain consistency rules, CEL version verification, API conformance, and severity calibration. Input-agnostic: works on local packages, PR diffs, or branch comparisons. Use when reviewing integration quality independently of any build or fix workflow.
Expert Swift concurrency decisions: async let vs TaskGroup selection, actor isolation boundaries, @MainActor placement strategies, Sendable conformance judgment calls, and structured vs unstructured task trade-offs. Use when designing concurrent code, debugging data races, or choosing between concurrency patterns. Trigger keywords: async, await, actor, Task, TaskGroup, @MainActor, Sendable, concurrency, data race, isolation, structured concurrency, continuation
Comprehensive epigenomics and gene regulation analysis integrating ENCODE functional genomics data, JASPAR transcription factor binding motifs, SCREEN cis-regulatory elements, ReMap TF binding sites, RegulomeDB variant regulatory scoring, 4D Nucleome chromatin conformation, and Ensembl regulatory features. Performs regulatory element cataloging, transcription factor analysis, variant regulatory impact scoring, chromatin conformation mapping, and gene-centric regulatory landscape profiling. Use when asked about gene regulation, enhancers, promoters, transcription factor binding, epigenetic modifications, chromatin structure, regulatory variants, or non-coding genome function.
Author agentic verification plans for Eve-compatible apps. Use when building structured test suites that verify app correctness AND Eve platform conformance — CLI parity, manifest conventions, SSO auth, managed migrations, fixture-driven ingestion, and agent efficiency.
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) operational compliance for compliance teams. Three Article-level decisions: (1) What's the risk tier of this AI system — prohibited (Art. 5), high-risk (Art. 6 + Annex III), limited-risk (Art. 50), or minimal-risk? (2) For high-risk systems, what's the Article 43 conformity assessment route (Module A internal control vs Module H full QMS + notified body) and what goes in the Annex IV technical documentation? (3) Per organizational role (provider / deployer / importer / distributor / authorized representative), what are the active obligations and deadlines? Use during AI system intake review, when planning conformity assessment, or when scoping deployer obligations. Cites Articles + Annexes for every output. NOT executive AI strategy (see chief-ai-officer-advisor). NOT a legal substitute.