Loading...
Loading...
Found 2 Skills
Compare a target (spec, product vision, competitor, RFP, or "to-be" design) against a system as actually built, and produce an evidence-first fit-gap — a capability matrix plus a step-by-step user-journey comparison, verified against the LIVE system (schema + code, not docs) and rolled up into decisions. Stack-agnostic (web apps, APIs, ERPs, low-code/CRM, pipelines, infra). Use whenever the user wants to compare a spec/vision/competitor to an existing system, asks "how far are we from X" or "what would it take to support Y", runs a gap analysis or COTS/package/vendor evaluation, or scopes a migration / re-platform / feature-parity effort. Trigger on fit-gap, gap analysis, capability comparison, as-is vs to-be, system comparison, feature parity, migration assessment — even when the user never says "fit-gap". Do NOT use for: reviewing a single diff/PR, a generic code review/audit with no target to compare against, or comparing two prose documents for wording.
The single entry point into the daily-work arc — a hybrid menu/argument router. Trigger whenever the user invokes /dev-workflows:daily, types /daily, asks "what should I do now", "where was I", "start my day", "what's next today", "wrap up my day", "end my day", or seems unsure which skill fits their current daily-work moment. Bare invocation shows a 5-station menu (starting / working / filing findings / reporting / wrapping up); with an argument (start | work | file | report | wrap, synonyms accepted) it jumps straight to the station and hands off to the right skill: ado-backlog:my-work, the situational toolbox (grill-then-plan, debug-mantra, study-design-verify, naming-audit, fit-gap-analysis, problem-description, ticket-trace, scrutinize, review-pr, dual-verifier, drive-to-legacy, crm-archaeology, generating-test-cases), findings-to-ado-backlog or ado-create-work-items (github-backlog twins on request), management-talk, or invoice-generator.