Loading...
Loading...
Found 114 Skills
Analyze gaps between implementation plans and actual codebase implementation for the Rust self-learning memory project
Analyze gaps between requirements/features that should be tested and actual test coverage, identifying testing deficiencies and prioritizing test improvements
Identify differences between current state and desired future state. Analyze gaps in capabilities, processes, skills, and technology to plan improvements and investments.
Use when the user asks to "find content gaps", "what am I missing", "topics to cover", "content opportunities", "what do competitors write about that I do not", "what topics am I missing", "topics my competitors cover that I lack", or "where are my content blind spots". Identifies content opportunities by finding topics and keywords your competitors cover that you do not. Reveals untapped content potential and strategic gaps in your content strategy. For broader competitive intelligence, see competitor-analysis. For general keyword discovery, see keyword-research.
Use when the user asks to "find content gaps", "竞品写了什么", or "还应该写什么"; builds a competitor-relative coverage map of missing topics, keyword gaps, and editorial-calendar opportunities. Not for raw keyword demand discovery — use keyword-research. 内容缺口/选题规划
Route-aware gap analysis. For Brownfield - uses /speckit.analyze to compare specs against implementation. For Greenfield - validates spec completeness and asks about target tech stack for new implementation. This is Step 4 of 6 in the reverse engineering process.
Identify underserved market gaps and unmet customer needs in e-commerce. Analyzes competitor blind spots, review pain points, search demand without adequate supply, and emerging customer segments.
Identifies content opportunities by finding topics and keywords your competitors cover that you don't. Reveals untapped content potential and strategic gaps in your content strategy.
Identify content gaps between your site and competitors. Use when the user says "content gaps", "what am I missing", "competitor content", "content opportunities", "topics I should cover", "content gap analysis", or asks about finding topics and keywords their site doesn't cover but competitors do.
Compare a target (spec, product vision, competitor, RFP, or "to-be" design) against a system as actually built, and produce an evidence-first fit-gap — a capability matrix plus a step-by-step user-journey comparison, verified against the LIVE system (schema + code, not docs) and rolled up into decisions. Stack-agnostic (web apps, APIs, ERPs, low-code/CRM, pipelines, infra). Use whenever the user wants to compare a spec/vision/competitor to an existing system, asks "how far are we from X" or "what would it take to support Y", runs a gap analysis or COTS/package/vendor evaluation, or scopes a migration / re-platform / feature-parity effort. Trigger on fit-gap, gap analysis, capability comparison, as-is vs to-be, system comparison, feature parity, migration assessment — even when the user never says "fit-gap". Do NOT use for: reviewing a single diff/PR, a generic code review/audit with no target to compare against, or comparing two prose documents for wording.
Diff a new AI regulation or guidance against your current governance posture — surfaces gaps, priorities, and a remediation plan with owners and deadlines. Use when an AI regulation moves (or you learn about one you missed), or when user says "new reg just dropped", "does [regulation] affect us", "gap analysis for EU AI Act", "compliance check against [AI law or guidance]", or pastes regulatory text.
Grounded gap analysis of requirements against the platform an app builds on — client docs become an Epic/Story tree whose every coverage verdict is re-run by executable gates against a validated platform checkout, scored in atomic commits, license-tier-tagged, summarized with a backlog. Use for "gap analysis", "what does the platform already cover".