Loading...
Loading...
Found 139 Skills
Directory convention, numbering system, and workflow for multi-session implementation plans. Follow when creating phased feature plans that span multiple sessions.
Transform design documents into TDD-based implementation plans with parallelizable tasks. Triggers: 'plan implementation', 'create tasks from design', or /plan. Enforces the Iron Law: no production code without a failing test first. Requires an existing design document — use /ideate first if none exists. Do NOT use for brainstorming, debugging, or code review.
Reference: implementation-planning framework for international hiring — EOR vs. entity decision framing, cross-functional triggers for tax/finance/HR, structured outside-counsel briefing requests, and a persistent gap tracker. Loaded by /expansion-kickoff and /expansion-update; not invoked directly.
Conduct a structured business-logic interview for a new feature, asking questions iteratively until shared understanding is reached, then save a clean spec doc to `docs/<feature-slug>-business-logic.md`. The skill always writes the spec to disk and always stops there — it never continues into implementation planning. Use during planning — before any code or file paths are discussed — whenever the user wants to add a feature, change a flow, or scope new behavior. Trigger on phrases like "I want to add X", "let's plan a new feature", "we need to support Y", "I'm thinking about a feature for Z", "scope out…", "let's figure out what should happen when…", or any time the user describes a new capability and the next move is clarifying *what* it should do (not *how* to build it). Triggers even if the user doesn't say "plan mode" or "business logic" — if a feature is being scoped, this is the right skill. Refuses to discuss code, file paths, schemas, libraries, or implementation; redirects back to user behavior and business rules. Output is a saved markdown spec; running the implementation-planning skill afterward is a separate, user-initiated step.
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.
Create comprehensive, phased implementation plans with sprints and atomic tasks. Use when user says: "make a plan", "create a plan", "plan this out", "plan the implementation", "help me plan", "design a plan", "draft a plan", "write a plan", "outline the steps", "break this down into tasks", "what's the plan for", or any similar planning request. Also triggers on explicit "/planner" or "/plan" commands.
Use when user specfically says 'plan harder'.
Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.
Turn ambiguous coding requests into verified Claude Code implementation specs. Use when the user wants requirements, an implementation plan, or a spec before coding; include source checks, needed ADRs, and agreed delivery. Do not use for already specified direct implementation or memory cleanup.
Turn ambiguous coding requests into verified Codex implementation specs. Use when the user wants requirements, an implementation plan, or a spec before coding; include source checks, needed ADRs, and agreed delivery. Do not use for already specified direct implementation or memory cleanup.