Loading...
Loading...
Found 26 Skills
Handles GitHub issue resolution end-to-end for prompts like "solve #123", "lets solve #123", "work on #123", "work on https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123", or by pasting a direct GitHub issue URL as the request. USE FOR: solve #123, continue work on issue #123, work on https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123, paste a GitHub issue URL for implementation work. DO NOT USE FOR: issue drafting only, PR review only, or non-implementation research.
Triage and resolve Arch Linux issues with pacman, systemd, and rolling-release best practices.
[Extended thinking: This workflow implements a sophisticated debugging and resolution pipeline that leverages AI-assisted debugging tools and observability platforms to systematically diagnose and res
Issue Workflow Stage 3——Fix code precisely based on confirmed root cause and solution, verify the effect, and document it in {slug}-fix-note.md. This is the final stage of the issue workflow—no verification loop means the workflow is incomplete. Two entry points: the standard path is triggered from easysdd-issue-analyze (with existing {slug}-analysis.md), and the quick path is triggered directly from easysdd-issue-report (without {slug}-analysis.md, as the root cause was determined by AI reading code during the report stage). Trigger scenarios: user says 'Start fixing the bug', 'Fix according to analysis', 'Start modifying code'. During repair, only modify the files stated in the solution; do not optimize casually or introduce new abstractions—these actions will make the scope spread to untraceable levels.
Set up automated GitHub issue triage and resolution using parallel Jules coding agents
Unified team skill for issue resolution. All roles invoke this skill with --role arg for role-specific execution. Triggers on "team issue".
Diagnose and fix plugin registry issues including orphaned entries and project-scope conflicts (addresses Claude Code issue
Phase 3 of the issue workflow —— Fix code precisely according to confirmed root causes and solutions, verify the results, and document it in {slug}-fix-note.md. This is the final stage of the issue workflow —— no verification closure means the workflow is incomplete. Two entry points: the standard path is triggered from cs-issue-analyze (with existing {slug}-analysis.md), and the fast track is triggered directly from cs-issue-report (without {slug}-analysis.md, as the root cause was identified by AI through code reading during the report phase). Trigger scenarios: User says "Start fixing the bug", "Fix according to the analysis", "Start modifying the code". During the fix, only modify the files specified in the solution; do not make incidental optimizations or introduce new abstractions —— these actions will cause the scope to expand to an untraceable extent.
Fix all open GitHub issues labeled `internal request` in isolated worktrees, then open PRs
Triage and resolve repository GitHub issues using the bundled CLI. Use when asked to read issue state, discuss issue scope, implement issue-driven code changes, post comments, or close issues.
Use Sentry MCP to discover, triage, and fix production issues with root-cause analysis. Use when asked to fix Sentry issues, triage production errors, investigate error spikes, or clean up Sentry noise. Requires Sentry MCP server. Triggers on "fix sentry", "triage errors", "production bugs", "sentry issues".
Structure and package support escalations for engineering, product, or leadership with full context, reproduction steps, and business impact. Use when an issue needs to go beyond support, when writing an escalation brief, or when assessing whether an issue warrants escalation.