Loading...
Loading...
Found 8 Skills
Run metric-driven iterative optimization loops. Define a measurable goal, build measurement scaffolding, then run parallel experiments that try many approaches, measure each against hard gates and/or LLM-as-judge quality scores, keep improvements, and converge toward the best solution. Use when optimizing clustering quality, search relevance, build performance, prompt quality, or any measurable outcome that benefits from systematic experimentation. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch, generalized for multi-file code changes and non-ML domains.
Score, evaluate, and iteratively improve any content or strategy using an auto-assembled panel of domain experts. Handles copy, sequences, landing pages, strategy docs, titles, charts, recruiting evaluations, or anything else that needs a quality gate. Recursively iterates until all scores hit 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use when asked to: "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "which version is better", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page", or when another skill needs a quality gate on its output. Also triggers on: "score this landing page", "expert panel these email variants", "rate this headline", "panel these charts".
Use this skill when the user asks to "evaluate MCP tools", "test tool selection", "improve tool descriptions", "check MCP schema quality", "eval my MCP server", or wants to measure whether Claude uses their MCP tools correctly. Tests tool selection accuracy, analyzes schema quality, and iteratively optimizes descriptions. Companion to build-mcp-server.
Iteratively reviews and fixes Claude Code skill quality issues until they meet standards. Runs automated fix-review cycles using the skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, improve skill descriptions, run automated skill review loops, or iteratively refine a skill. Triggers on 'fix my skill', 'improve skill quality', 'skill improvement loop'. NOT for one-time reviews—use /skill-reviewer directly.
Trigger: Call this skill when the task you are facing clearly requires collaboration of multiple ideological tools. Common trigger signals include: starting a new project from scratch, tackling complex and difficult problems, iterating and optimizing existing solutions. This skill provides standardized cross-skill workflow combinations to solve the problem of "which skill to use first and how to connect them". English: Trigger when a task clearly requires multiple skills in sequence. Use this skill to select a standard workflow that chains skills together, defines data handoff between steps, and specifies termination conditions.
Improve an existing skill from work feedback and repository evidence. Use when repeated corrections reveal a weak method, instructions constrain useful judgment, checks miss required properties, or commands no longer work.
Use when a Scenario output must be checked and improved rather than accepted first roll: iterating a generation until it matches the brief, fixing a batch that came back off-brief, retrying failed shots methodically, wiring an automated generate, review, revise loop, or deciding whether to re-prompt, swap references, inpaint, post-process, or change model. Keywords: refine, iterate, critique, review loop, QA, self-correction, verify, acceptance criteria, retry, drift.
Iterates toward a goal one measured change at a time, keeping what raises the score and reverting what does not, until a fresh run of the check proves the completion criteria met. Use when the user says "hillclimb", or when the user gives a goal and completion criteria and asks to hillclimb, iterate, or keep going until they pass.