Loading...
Loading...
Found 46 Skills
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
For users needing to conduct systematic literature reviews, literature reviews, related work, or literature research: AI automatically generates search terms, performs multi-source retrieval → deduplication → AI reads and scores each paper one by one (1–10 points for semantic relevance and sub-topic grouping) → selects papers based on high-score priority ratio → automatically generates word budget for the review (70% cited sections + 30% non-cited sections, average of three samplings) → free writing in the style of senior domain experts (fixed sections: abstract, introduction, sub-topics, discussion, future outlook, conclusion), with strict verification of main text word count and number of references, and mandatory export to PDF and Word. Supports multilingual translation and intelligent compilation (en/zh/ja/de/fr/es).
Use this skill for "write a literature review", "synthesize papers", "review the literature", "summarize research findings", "identify research trends", "gap analysis", "thematic review", "systematic review", "scoping review", "narrative review", "compare studies", "research synthesis", or when the user wants to synthesize multiple papers into a cohesive literature review.
Systematic literature review workflow: scope, search (arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar), screen, extract, synthesize, and identify gaps. Triggers on: "literature review", "survey the literature", "related work", "systematic review", "synthesize the research", "find papers about", "research gap analysis".
Use when "literature review", "research synthesis", "systematic review", "academic search", or asking about "find papers", "cite sources", "research gaps", "meta-analysis", "bibliography"
Conduct a systematic literature review on an academic topic. Use when the user asks for a literature review, survey, or systematic overview of a research area.
Run a literature review using paper search and primary-source synthesis. Use when the user asks for a lit review, paper survey, state of the art, or academic landscape summary on a research topic.
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.
Conduct comprehensive literature reviews using multi-perspective dialogue simulation. Generate diverse expert personas, conduct grounded Q&A conversations, and synthesize findings into structured knowledge. Use when starting a new research project or writing a survey section.
Use this skill when the user wants a systematic literature review, survey, or synthesis across multiple academic papers on a topic. Also covers annotated bibliographies and cross-paper comparisons. Searches arXiv and outputs reports in APA, IEEE, or BibTeX format. Not for single-paper tasks — use academic-paper-review for reviewing one paper.
Guide a CS or AI PhD student through a focused literature review sprint that produces a ranked paper map, notes, gaps, and next actions. Use this skill whenever the user needs to survey a topic, prepare related work, check whether an idea is novel, catch up on a field, read papers before a meeting, or turn a pile of papers into an organized research direction.
Guide a focused CS or AI literature review sprint that turns a topic, idea, claim, or project direction into a ranked paper map, closest-work risk assessment, method taxonomy, novelty implications, baseline implications, and next actions. Use this skill whenever the user needs to survey a topic, check novelty, map related work, prepare a project, find canonical or recent papers, decide read/skim/ignore priority, or turn papers into a research direction.