Loading...
Loading...
Found 7 Skills
Evaluates accuracy of quantized or unquantized LLMs using NeMo Evaluator Launcher (NEL). Triggers on "evaluate model", "benchmark accuracy", "run MMLU", "evaluate quantized model", "accuracy drop", "run nel". Handles deployment, config generation, and evaluation execution. Not for quantizing models (use ptq) or deploying/serving models (use deployment).
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
Multi-model agent orchestration using specialized agents for planning, coding, research, math/science, visual analysis, and adversarial review. Use when tasks are complex enough to benefit from different models' strengths, when you want adversarial review to catch blind spots, or when coordinating multi-step workflows across agent roles. Triggers on complex projects, multi-step tasks, architecture decisions, or when explicitly requested.
Cross-model benchmark for gstack skills. Runs the same prompt through Claude, GPT (via Codex CLI), and Gemini side-by-side — compares latency, tokens, cost, and optionally quality via LLM judge. Answers "which model is actually best for this skill?" with data instead of vibes. Separate from /benchmark, which measures web page performance. Use when: "benchmark models", "compare models", "which model is best for X", "cross-model comparison", "model shootout". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "compare models", "model shootout", "which model is best".
Run an autonomous Humanize-governed vLLM SOTA performance loop for one LLM model: first perform the fixed fair vLLM/SGLang/TensorRT-LLM deployment search and benchmark, then start one RLCR loop that repeatedly decides the gap, profiles the current bottleneck, runs layer/kernel pipeline analysis, patches vLLM code, optionally uses ncu-report-skill for kernel evidence, and revalidates until vLLM matches or beats the best observed framework under the same workload and SLA.
Measures the task accuracy of text models served by MAX using standard benchmarks such as GSM8K, MMLU, HellaSwag, ARC, AIME, GPQA, TruthfulQA, WinoGrande, and BABILong. Use when benchmarking a served model, comparing it with model-card or reference scores, verifying that a new MAX model produces correct answers, or running repeatable dataset evaluations against a MAX OpenAI-compatible endpoint.
Benchmark a model served on MAX with the `max benchmark` command: measure throughput (tokens/sec), latency (TTFT, TPOT, inter-token latency), and GPU utilization by driving load against a running `max serve` endpoint. Use this whenever the user wants to benchmark, load-test, or measure the performance of a MAX model, get tokens-per-second / TTFT / TPOT numbers, run a concurrency or request-rate sweep, compare latency vs throughput, size a deployment, or produce benchmark JSON, even if they don't say "benchmark" by name. Also use when a `max benchmark` run fails to connect or reports zero/garbage numbers.