Loading...
Loading...
Found 26 Skills
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Simulate peer review by constructing reviewer personas from Zotero sources. Identifies relevant perspectives, retrieves full texts, builds reviewer profiles, and generates focused reviews on theory/methods and findings.
Request peer review with proper context and preparation. Structures review requests with clear description of changes and testing status.
Educator peer review management for Canvas LMS. Tracks completion rates, analyzes comment quality, flags problematic reviews, sends targeted reminders, and generates instructor-ready reports. Trigger phrases include "peer review status", "how are peer reviews going", "who hasn't reviewed", "review quality", or any peer review follow-up task.
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
Get a second opinion from Gemini on code, architecture, debugging, or security. Uses gemini-coach CLI with AI-to-AI prompting for clear, actionable analysis. Trigger with 'ask gemini', 'gemini review', 'second opinion', 'peer review', or 'consult gemini'.
Expert knowledge of academic writing standards for peer-reviewed papers, including citation integrity, style compliance, clarity, and scientific writing best practices. Use when reviewing or editing academic manuscripts, papers, or research documentation.
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.
Expert-level academic research and LaTeX paper writing with IEEE/APA citation support. Creates peer-reviewed research papers, literature reviews, and theses with proper scholarly standards.
Select the most appropriate pipeline for a user goal, lock it in `PIPELINE.lock.md`, and route checkpoint questions into `DECISIONS.md`. **Trigger**: pipeline router, choose pipeline, workflow selection, PIPELINE.lock.md, 选择流程. **Use when**: 用户目标/交付物不清晰，需要在 snapshot/survey/tutorial/systematic-review/peer-review 中选一个并设置最小 HITL 问题集。 **Skip if**: pipeline 已锁定（`PIPELINE.lock.md` 存在）且所需问题已回答/签字完成。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 尽量一次性提问；信息不足就写 `DECISIONS.md` 并停下等待。
Systematic academic literature search with source prioritization and APA 7th edition citations. Use when the user needs to research a topic with scholarly sources, verify claims with academic backing, find peer-reviewed evidence, compile research findings, or generate properly cited reports. Triggers: "research [topic]", "what does the research say about...", "find studies on...", "verify this claim...", "literature review", "academic sources for...", "peer-reviewed evidence", "scholarly articles about...", "evidence-based", "cite sources for...". This skill provides basic APA citation capabilities; for advanced citation work (complex source types, edge cases, batch formatting), consider the `apa-style-citation` skill which offers enhanced citation expertise.