Loading...
Loading...
Found 8 Skills
Analyze gaps between requirements/features that should be tested and actual test coverage, identifying testing deficiencies and prioritizing test improvements
Performs pseudo-mutation analysis on .NET production code to find gaps in existing test suites. Use when the user asks to find weak tests, discover untested edge cases, check if tests would catch a bug, or evaluate test effectiveness through mutation-style reasoning. Analyzes production code for mutation points (boundary conditions, boolean flips, null returns, exception removal, arithmetic changes) and checks whether existing tests would detect each mutation. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), detecting test anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), measuring assertion diversity (use assertion-quality), or running actual mutation testing tools.
Provides file paths to language-specific reference files for the test ANALYSIS skills (assertion-quality, test-anti-patterns, test-gap-analysis, test-smell-detection, test-tagging). Call this skill to discover available extension files (e.g., dotnet.md for .NET/MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit, python.md for pytest/unittest, typescript.md for Jest/Vitest/Mocha, java.md for JUnit/TestNG, etc.). Do not use directly — invoked by the test-quality-auditor agent and polyglot analysis skills that need framework-specific lookup tables (test markers, assertion APIs, skip annotations, sleep patterns, mystery guest indicators, integration markers, setup/teardown, tag-support capability).
Assess tests for an identified code or test change, feature, PR or commit. USE FOR: review changed behavior or regression tests, prove pre-fix/missing behavior is detected, revision-bound red-green evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE without an identified change: hypothetical mutations or general suite blind spots (test-gap-analysis). Also exclude per-test readiness/A-F grades (grade-tests), coverage (coverage-analysis), new suites (code-testing), or mutation engines.
Expand unit test coverage by targeting untested branches and edge cases. Use when users ask to "increase test coverage", "add more tests", "expand unit tests", "cover edge cases", "improve test coverage", or want to identify and fill gaps in existing test suites. Adapts to project's testing framework.
Analyzes code to identify untested functions, low coverage areas, and missing edge cases. Use when reviewing test coverage or planning test improvements. Generates specific test suggestions with example templates following amplihack's testing pyramid (60% unit, 30% integration, 10% E2E). Can use coverage.py for Python projects.
Find branch coverage gaps in changed code and fix them by writing missing tests. Two analysis layers: Source ↔ Test (logic branches vs test cases) and Spec ↔ Test (requirement scenarios vs test cases, when a spec file is provided). Use when verifying test completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug, when auditing whether tests match a spec, or when suspecting untested branches.
Inventory and govern a project's test assets. Connect requirements, business rules, risks, bugs, and cross-boundary contracts to stable TEST-IDs and executable evidence in the repository's existing test registry or TESTS.md. Use for test inventory, test gap analysis, unit/integration/contract/E2E/smoke classification, bug-to-test regression protection, consumer/provider contract testing, test-necessity review, and pre-delivery evidence review.