Loading...
Loading...
Found 6 Skills
Visual feedback from humans via screenshot annotations. Use this skill CONSTANTLY — any time you need visual context, want to verify UI changes, need to confirm layout, debug a visual issue, check styling, validate a design, or show your work. Capture the screen, look at it, figure out what you need feedback on, annotate it, and ask. Do not ask the user what to capture — just capture and look.
Executes full-project QA like a real user by discovering the repository verification and E2E contracts, running build, lint, test, and startup commands, exercising core workflows end-to-end through CLI, HTTP, and browser interfaces, requiring automated regression coverage for supported critical flows, fixing root-cause regressions, and rerunning the full gate. Uses the agent-browser companion skill for Web UI validation when a web surface exists. Use when validating a branch, release candidate, migration, refactor, or risky commit. Do not use for static code review only, one-off unit test edits, planning test cases, or architecture brainstorming without execution — use qa-report for planning and documentation.
Reviews finished and in-progress digital products to assess adherence to design specifications and discover potential issues. Use when user says "design review", "design QA", "QA review", "check implementation", "visual bugs", "compare to design", "match the specs", "review the build", "before launch", "pre-launch review", "implementation review", "verify design", "design validation", "spacing issues", "visual discrepancies", "accessibility review", "WCAG compliance", or "responsive testing". Validates implementation against design intent, identifies visual and interaction discrepancies, and provides actionable feedback. Do NOT use when still designing concepts (use design-concepts), need to understand users (use design-research), or nothing has been built yet.
Manual QA testing — verify features end-to-end as a user would, using every tool available (browser, macOS, bash, APIs). Focuses on what formal test suites cannot capture: visual correctness, UX flows, usability judgment, integration reality, edge cases, and failure modes. Standalone or composable with /ship. Triggers: qa, qa test, manual test, test the feature, verify it works, exploratory testing, smoke test, end-to-end verification.
Instant visual verification via screenshots. For quick checks like 'does button look blue', 'is layout centered', 'header look right on mobile'. Fast alternative to formal testing - just look and confirm. Use when user wants visual inspection without creating test files.
UI and design review: evaluate visual quality, responsive behavior, accessibility, color/contrast, typography, layout consistency, and i18n readiness using browser-based validation against industrial standards.