Loading...
Loading...
Found 10 Skills
Validates a UX spec, HUD design, or interaction pattern library for completeness, accessibility compliance, GDD alignment, and implementation readiness. Produces APPROVED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdict with specific gaps.
Evaluate and improve user experience of interfaces (CLI, web, mobile)
Orchestrate the UI team through the full UX pipeline: from UX spec authoring through visual design, implementation, review, and polish. Integrates with /ux-design, /ux-review, and studio UX templates.
Audits web UI quality across accessibility, interaction, forms, typography, navigation, layout, performance, motion, and microcopy. Use when reviewing or refining frontend UI before merge or release, or when the user asks for a UI, UX, or accessibility audit.
Android UI/UX design or review with Material 3 Expressive (M3 Expressive / Material You Expressive). Use when selecting expressive component tokens, defining expressive hierarchy, motion, color, shape, typography, or reviewing Android UI against expressive guidance. Not for non-Android platforms, non-UI Android tasks, or implementation-only requests without design decisions.
Validate PRD, UX, Architecture and Epics specs are complete. Use when the user says "check implementation readiness".
Conduct heuristic evaluation of user interfaces using Nielsen's 10 usability principles. Use this skill when the user needs to audit a website, app, or interface for usability issues, prioritize UX improvements, or conduct a quick expert review without user testing — even if they say 'review this UI', 'find usability problems', or 'why do users struggle with our app'.
Audits web UI quality across accessibility, interaction, forms, typography, navigation, layout, performance, motion, and microcopy. Use when reviewing or refining frontend UI before merge or release, or when the user asks for a UI, UX, or accessibility audit.
Collect improvement insights from UI/UX reviews, document research, or external references, convert confirmed items into development requirements. Use when users have optimization suggestions, research findings, or want to improve based on external references. Triggers on keywords like "insights", "improvements", "optimize", "review findings", "research", "reference", "optimization suggestions", "review results", "research".
Critically review terminal user interfaces for UX quality, responsiveness, visual design, and interactivity. Use when asked to "review my TUI", "test my TUI UX", "audit my terminal UI", "check TUI responsiveness", "review TUI keybindings", "check interactivity", or any request to evaluate the user experience quality of a ratatui/crossterm/ncurses-based terminal application. Launches the TUI in tmux, systematically tests 10 dimensions (responsiveness, input conflicts, visual clarity, navigation, feedback loops, error states, layout, keyboard design, permission flows, visual design & color), and produces a graded report with screenshots and specific findings. Benchmarks against Claude Code, OpenCode, and Codex — the three best-in-class AI terminal UIs.