Back to Details

domain-authority-auditor

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Domain Authority Auditor

域名权威度审计工具

Based on CITE Domain Rating. Full benchmark reference: references/cite-domain-rating.md
This skill evaluates domain authority across 40 standardized criteria organized in 4 dimensions. It produces a comprehensive audit report with per-item scoring, dimension and weighted scores by domain type, veto item checks, and a prioritized action plan.
Sister skill: content-quality-auditor evaluates content at the page level (80 items). This skill evaluates the domain behind the content (40 items). Together they provide a complete 120-item assessment.
Namespace note: CITE uses C01-C10 for Citation items; CORE-EEAT uses C01-C10 for Contextual Clarity items. In combined 120-item assessments, prefix with the framework name (e.g., CITE-C01 vs CORE-C01) to avoid confusion.
基于CITE Domain Rating。完整基准参考：references/cite-domain-rating.md
此工具会从4个维度的40项标准化标准评估域名权威度，生成包含逐项得分、维度及按域名类型加权的分数、否决项检查结果、优先级行动计划的全面审计报告。
关联工具：content-quality-auditor 用于页面级内容评估（80项），此工具用于评估内容背后的域名（40项）。两者结合可实现完整的120项评估。
命名空间说明：CITE 使用C01-C10代表引用项；CORE-EEAT 使用C01-C10代表上下文清晰度项。在120项联合评估中，需在编号前添加框架名称（例如CITE-C01 vs CORE-C01）以避免混淆。

When to Use This Skill

何时使用此工具

  • Evaluating domain authority before a GEO campaign
  • Benchmarking your domain against competitors
  • Assessing whether a domain is trustworthy as a citation source
  • Running periodic domain health checks
  • After link building campaigns to measure progress
  • Identifying manipulation red flags (PBNs, link farms, penalty history)
  • Planning domain authority improvement strategy
  • Cross-referencing with content-quality-auditor for full 120-item assessment
  • 在开展GEO营销活动前评估域名权威度
  • 将你的域名与竞品进行基准对比
  • 评估某域名是否适合作为可信引用源
  • 定期运行域名健康检测
  • 链接建设活动后衡量进展
  • 识别操纵风险信号（PBN、链接农场、处罚历史）
  • 规划域名权威度提升策略
  • 与content-quality-auditor结合进行完整的120项评估

What This Skill Does

此工具的功能

  1. Full 40-Item Audit: Scores every CITE check item as Pass/Partial/Fail
  2. Dimension Scoring: Calculates scores for all 4 dimensions (0-100 each)
  3. Weighted Totals: Applies domain-type-specific weights for CITE Score
  4. Veto Detection: Flags critical manipulation signals (T03, T05, T09)
  5. Priority Ranking: Identifies Top 5 improvements sorted by impact
  6. Action Plan: Generates specific, actionable improvement steps
  7. Cross-Reference: Optionally pairs with CORE-EEAT for combined diagnosis
  1. 完整40项审计：为每一项CITE检查项标记通过/部分通过/未通过
  2. 维度评分：计算4个维度的得分（每个维度0-100分）
  3. 加权总分：根据域名类型应用特定权重计算CITE分数
  4. 否决项检测：标记关键操纵信号（T03、T05、T09）
  5. 优先级排序：按影响程度排序前5项改进方向
  6. 行动计划：生成具体、可执行的改进步骤
  7. 交叉参考：可选择与CORE-EEAT结合进行联合诊断

How to Use

使用方法

Audit Your Domain

审计你的域名

Audit domain authority for [domain]
Run a CITE domain audit on [domain] as a [domain type]
Audit domain authority for [domain]
Run a CITE domain audit on [domain] as a [domain type]

Audit with Domain Type

指定域名类型进行审计

CITE audit for example.com as an e-commerce site
Score this SaaS domain against the 40-item benchmark: [domain]
CITE audit for example.com as an e-commerce site
Score this SaaS domain against the 40-item benchmark: [domain]

Comparative Audit

对比审计

Compare domain authority: [your domain] vs [competitor 1] vs [competitor 2]
Compare domain authority: [your domain] vs [competitor 1] vs [competitor 2]

Combined Assessment

联合评估

Run full 120-item assessment on [domain]: CITE domain audit + CORE-EEAT content audit on [sample pages]
Run full 120-item assessment on [domain]: CITE domain audit + CORE-EEAT content audit on [sample pages]

Data Sources

数据源

See CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.
With ~~link database + ~~SEO tool + ~~AI monitor + ~~knowledge graph + ~~brand monitor connected: Automatically pull backlink profiles and link quality metrics from ~~link database, domain authority scores and keyword rankings from ~~SEO tool, AI citation data from ~~AI monitor, entity presence from ~~knowledge graph, and brand mention data from ~~brand monitor.
With manual data only: Ask the user to provide:
  1. Domain to evaluate
  2. Domain type (if not auto-detectable): Content Publisher, Product & Service, E-commerce, Community & UGC, Tool & Utility, or Authority & Institutional
  3. Backlink data: referring domains count, domain authority, top linking domains
  4. Traffic estimates (from any SEO tool or SimilarWeb)
  5. Competitor domains for comparison (optional)
Proceed with the full 40-item audit using provided data. Note in the output which items could not be fully evaluated due to missing access (e.g., AI citation data, knowledge graph queries, WHOIS history).
工具类别占位符请查看CONNECTORS.md。
在连接~~link database（链接数据库） + ~~SEO tool（SEO工具） + ~~AI monitor（AI监控工具） + ~~knowledge graph（知识图谱） + ~~brand monitor（品牌监控工具）的情况下： 自动从link database提取反向链接配置文件和链接质量指标，从SEO tool提取域名权威度分数和关键词排名，从AI monitor提取AI引用数据，从knowledge graph提取实体存在情况，从~~brand monitor提取品牌提及数据。
仅使用手动数据的情况： 请用户提供以下信息：
  1. 待评估的域名
  2. 域名类型（若无法自动检测）：内容发布商、产品与服务、电商、社区与UGC、工具与实用程序、权威与机构
  3. 反向链接数据：引用域名数量、域名权威度、顶级链接域名
  4. 流量预估（来自任意SEO工具或SimilarWeb）
  5. 用于对比的竞品域名（可选）
使用提供的数据执行完整的40项审计。在输出中注明哪些项因缺少数据来源无法完全评估（例如AI引用数据、知识图谱查询、WHOIS历史）。

Instructions

操作步骤

When a user requests a domain authority audit:
当用户请求域名权威度审计时：

Step 1: Preparation

步骤1：准备工作

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Audit Setup

审计设置

Domain: [domain] Domain Type: [auto-detected or user-specified] Dimension Weights: [from domain-type weight table below]
域名：[domain] 域名类型：[自动检测或用户指定] 维度权重：[来自下方的域名类型权重表]

Domain-Type Weight Table

域名类型权重表

Canonical source: 
references/cite-domain-rating.md
. This inline copy is for convenience.
DimDefaultContent PublisherProduct & ServiceE-commerceCommunity & UGCTool & UtilityAuthority & Institutional
C35%40%25%20%35%25%45%
I20%15%30%20%10%30%20%
T25%20%25%35%25%25%20%
E20%25%20%25%30%20%15%
标准来源：
references/cite-domain-rating.md
。此处为方便显示的内联副本。
维度默认值内容发布商产品与服务电商社区与UGC工具与实用程序权威与机构
C35%40%25%20%35%25%45%
I20%15%30%20%10%30%20%
T25%20%25%35%25%25%20%
E20%25%20%25%30%20%15%

Veto Check (Emergency Brake)

否决项检查（紧急制动）

Veto ItemStatusAction
T03: Link-Traffic Coherence✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO[If VETO: "Audit backlink profile; disavow toxic links"]
T05: Backlink Profile Uniqueness✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO[If VETO: "Flag as manipulation network; investigate link sources"]
T09: Penalty & Deindex History✅ Pass / ⚠️ VETO[If VETO: "Address penalty first; all other optimization is futile"]

If any veto item triggers, flag it prominently at the top of the report. CITE Score is capped at 39 (Poor) regardless of other scores.
否决项状态操作
T03: 链接-流量一致性✅ 通过 / ⚠️ 否决[若否决：“审计反向链接配置文件；拒绝有毒链接”]
T05: 反向链接配置文件唯一性✅ 通过 / ⚠️ 否决[若否决：“标记为操纵网络；调查链接来源”]
T09: 处罚与除名历史✅ 通过 / ⚠️ 否决[若否决：“先处理处罚问题；其他优化均无效”]

若任何否决项触发，需在报告顶部显著标记。无论其他得分如何，CITE分数将被限制为39分（较差）。

Step 2: C + I Audit (20 items)

步骤2：C + I审计（20项）

Evaluate each item against the criteria in references/cite-domain-rating.md.
Score each item:
  • Pass = 10 points (fully meets criteria)
  • Partial = 5 points (partially meets criteria)
  • Fail = 0 points (does not meet criteria)
markdown
undefined
根据references/cite-domain-rating.md中的标准评估每一项。
为每一项打分：
  • 通过 = 10分（完全符合标准）
  • 部分通过 = 5分（部分符合标准）
  • 未通过 = 0分（不符合标准）
markdown
undefined

C — Citation

C — 引用

IDCheck ItemScoreNotes
C01Referring Domains VolumePass/Partial/Fail[specific observation]
C02Referring Domains QualityPass/Partial/Fail[specific observation]
............
C10Link Source DiversityPass/Partial/Fail[specific observation]
C Score: [X]/100
ID检查项得分备注
C01引用域名数量通过/部分通过/未通过[具体观察结果]
C02引用域名质量通过/部分通过/未通过[具体观察结果]
............
C10链接来源多样性通过/部分通过/未通过[具体观察结果]
C维度得分：[X]/100

I — Identity

I — 身份

IDCheck ItemScoreNotes
I01Knowledge Graph PresencePass/Partial/Fail[specific observation]
............
I Score: [X]/100
undefined
ID检查项得分备注
I01知识图谱存在性通过/部分通过/未通过[具体观察结果]
............
I维度得分：[X]/100
undefined

Step 3: T + E Audit (20 items)

步骤3：T + E审计（20项）

Same format for Trust and Eminence dimensions.
markdown
undefined
信任和声誉维度采用相同格式。
markdown
undefined

T — Trust

T — 信任

IDCheck ItemScoreNotes
T01Link Profile NaturalnessPass/Partial/Fail[specific observation]
............
T Score: [X]/100
ID检查项得分备注
T01链接配置文件自然度通过/部分通过/未通过[具体观察结果]
............
T维度得分：[X]/100

E — Eminence

E — 声誉

IDCheck ItemScoreNotes
E01Organic Search VisibilityPass/Partial/Fail[specific observation]
............
E Score: [X]/100

**Note**: Some items require specialized data (C05-C08 AI citation data, I01 knowledge graph queries, T04-T05 IP/profile analysis). Score what is observable; mark unverifiable items as "N/A — requires [data source]" and exclude from dimension average.
ID检查项得分备注
E01自然搜索可见性通过/部分通过/未通过[具体观察结果]
............
E维度得分：[X]/100

**注意**：部分项需要专用数据（C05-C08 AI引用数据、I01知识图谱查询、T04-T05 IP/配置文件分析）。对可观察到的内容打分；无法验证的项标记为“N/A — 需要[数据来源]”，并从维度平均分中排除。

Step 4: Scoring & Report

步骤4：评分与报告

Calculate scores and generate the final report:
markdown
undefined
计算得分并生成最终报告：
markdown
undefined

CITE Domain Authority Report

CITE域名权威度报告

Overview

概述

  • Domain: [domain]
  • Domain Type: [type]
  • Audit Date: [date]
  • CITE Score: [score]/100 ([rating])
  • Veto Status: ✅ No triggers / ⚠️ [item] triggered — Score capped at 39
  • 域名：[domain]
  • 域名类型：[类型]
  • 审计日期：[日期]
  • CITE分数：[得分]/100（[评级]）
  • 否决状态：✅ 无触发项 / ⚠️ [项]触发 — 分数限制为39分

Dimension Scores

维度得分

DimensionScoreRatingWeightWeighted
C — Citation[X]/100[rating][X]%[X]
I — Identity[X]/100[rating][X]%[X]
T — Trust[X]/100[rating][X]%[X]
E — Eminence[X]/100[rating][X]%[X]
CITE Score[X]/100
Score Calculation:
  • CITE Score = C × [w_C] + I × [w_I] + T × [w_T] + E × [w_E]
Rating Scale: 90-100 Excellent | 75-89 Good | 60-74 Medium | 40-59 Low | 0-39 Poor
维度得分评级权重加权得分
C — 引用[X]/100[评级][X]%[X]
I — 身份[X]/100[评级][X]%[X]
T — 信任[X]/100[评级][X]%[X]
E — 声誉[X]/100[评级][X]%[X]
CITE总分[X]/100
分数计算方式：
  • CITE总分 = C × [w_C] + I × [w_I] + T × [w_T] + E × [w_E]
评级标准：90-100 优秀 | 75-89 良好 | 60-74 中等 | 40-59 较低 | 0-39 较差

Per-Item Scores

逐项得分

IDCheck ItemScoreNotes
C01Referring Domains Volume[Pass/Partial/Fail][observation]
C02Referring Domains Quality[Pass/Partial/Fail][observation]
............
E10Industry Share of Voice[Pass/Partial/Fail][observation]
ID检查项得分备注
C01引用域名数量[通过/部分通过/未通过][观察结果]
C02引用域名质量[通过/部分通过/未通过][观察结果]
............
E10行业话语权[通过/部分通过/未通过][观察结果]

Top 5 Priority Improvements

前5项优先级改进方向

Sorted by: weight × points lost (highest impact first)
  1. [ID] [Name] — [specific modification suggestion]
    • Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points
    • Action: [concrete step]
  2. [ID] [Name] — [specific modification suggestion]
    • Current: [Fail/Partial] | Potential gain: [X] weighted points
    • Action: [concrete step]
3–5. [Same format]
排序依据：权重 × 丢失分数（影响程度从高到低）
  1. [ID] [名称] — [具体修改建议]
    • 当前状态：[未通过/部分通过] | 潜在提升：[X]加权分
    • 操作：[具体步骤]
  2. [ID] [名称] — [具体修改建议]
    • 当前状态：[未通过/部分通过] | 潜在提升：[X]加权分
    • 操作：[具体步骤]
3–5. [相同格式]

Action Plan

行动计划

Quick Wins (< 1 week)

快速实现（<1周）

  • [Action 1]
  • [Action 2]
  • [操作1]
  • [操作2]

Medium Effort (1-4 weeks)

中等难度（1-4周）

  • [Action 3]
  • [Action 4]
  • [操作3]
  • [操作4]

Strategic (1-3 months)

战略级（1-3个月）

  • [Action 5]
  • [Action 6]
  • [操作5]
  • [操作6]

Cross-Reference with CORE-EEAT

与CORE-EEAT交叉参考

For a complete assessment, pair this CITE audit with a CORE-EEAT content audit:
AssessmentScoreRating
CITE (Domain)[X]/100[rating]
CORE-EEAT (Content)[Run content-quality-auditor on sample pages]—
Diagnosis Matrix:
  • High CITE + High CORE-EEAT → Maintain and expand
  • High CITE + Low CORE-EEAT → Prioritize content quality
  • Low CITE + High CORE-EEAT → Build domain authority
  • Low CITE + Low CORE-EEAT → Start with content, then domain
如需完整评估，请将此CITE审计与CORE-EEAT内容审计结合：
评估项得分评级
CITE（域名）[X]/100[评级]
CORE-EEAT（内容）[对样本页面运行content-quality-auditor]—
诊断矩阵：
  • 高CITE分 + 高CORE-EEAT分 → 维持并扩展
  • 高CITE分 + 低CORE-EEAT分 → 优先提升内容质量
  • 低CITE分 + 高CORE-EEAT分 → 构建域名权威度
  • 低CITE分 + 低CORE-EEAT分 → 先优化内容，再提升域名权威度

Recommended Next Steps

推荐后续步骤

  • For domain authority building: focus on top 5 priorities above
  • For content improvement: use content-quality-auditor on key pages
  • For backlink strategy: use backlink-analyzer for detailed link analysis
  • For competitor benchmarking: use competitor-analysis with CITE scores
  • For tracking progress: run 
    /seo:report
    with CITE score trends
undefined
  • 若要提升域名权威度：聚焦上述前5项优先级改进方向
  • 若要优化内容：在关键页面使用content-quality-auditor
  • 若要制定反向链接策略：使用backlink-analyzer进行详细链接分析
  • 若要进行竞品基准对比：结合CITE分数使用competitor-analysis
  • 若要跟踪进展：运行
    /seo:report
    查看CITE分数趋势
undefined

Validation Checkpoints

验证检查点

Input Validation

输入验证

  • Domain identified and accessible
  • Domain type confirmed (auto-detected or user-specified)
  • Backlink data available (at minimum: referring domains count, DA/DR)
  • If comparative audit, competitor domains also specified
  • 已识别并可访问域名
  • 已确认域名类型（自动检测或用户指定）
  • 已获取反向链接数据（至少包含引用域名数量、DA/DR）
  • 若为对比审计，已指定竞品域名

Output Validation

输出验证

  • All 40 items scored (or marked N/A with reason)
  • All 4 dimension scores calculated correctly
  • Weighted CITE Score matches domain-type weight configuration
  • All 3 veto items checked first and flagged if triggered
  • Top 5 improvements sorted by weighted impact, not arbitrary
  • Every recommendation is specific and actionable (not generic advice)
  • Action plan includes concrete steps with effort estimates
  • 所有40项已打分（或标记为N/A并说明原因）
  • 所有4个维度得分计算正确
  • 加权CITE分数与域名类型权重配置一致
  • 已优先检查所有3个否决项，触发时已标记
  • 前5项改进方向按加权影响排序，而非随机排序
  • 每一项建议均具体且可执行（非通用建议）
  • 行动计划包含具体步骤及工作量预估

Example

示例

User: "Audit domain authority for cloudhosting.com as a content publisher"
Output:
markdown
undefined
用户："Audit domain authority for cloudhosting.com as a content publisher"
输出：
markdown
undefined

CITE Domain Authority Report

CITE域名权威度报告

Overview

概述

  • Domain: cloudhosting.com
  • Domain Type: Content Publisher
  • Audit Date: 2025-02-03
  • CITE Score: 69.9/100 (Medium)
  • Veto Status: ✅ No triggers
  • 域名：cloudhosting.com
  • 域名类型：内容发布商
  • 审计日期：2025-02-03
  • CITE分数：69.9/100（中等）
  • 否决状态：✅ 无触发项

Veto Check (Emergency Brake)

否决项检查（紧急制动）

Veto ItemStatusAction
T03: Link-Traffic Coherence✅ PassLink growth correlates with traffic growth
T05: Backlink Profile Uniqueness✅ PassNo PBN patterns detected; diverse link sources
T09: Penalty & Deindex History✅ PassNo manual actions; clean penalty history
否决项状态操作
T03: 链接-流量一致性✅ 通过链接增长与流量增长相关
T05: 反向链接配置文件唯一性✅ 通过未检测到PBN模式；链接来源多样
T09: 处罚与除名历史✅ 通过无手动处罚记录；历史干净

Dimension Scores

维度得分

DimensionScoreRatingWeightWeighted
C — Citation72/100Medium40%28.8
I — Identity58/100Low15%8.7
T — Trust81/100Good20%16.2
E — Eminence65/100Medium25%16.25
CITE Score69.9/100
Score Calculation:
  • CITE Score = 72 × 0.40 + 58 × 0.15 + 81 × 0.20 + 65 × 0.25 = 69.9
Rating Scale: 90-100 Excellent | 75-89 Good | 60-74 Medium | 40-59 Low | 0-39 Poor
维度得分评级权重加权得分
C — 引用72/100中等40%28.8
I — 身份58/100较低15%8.7
T — 信任81/100良好20%16.2
E — 声誉65/100中等25%16.25
CITE总分69.9/100
分数计算方式：
  • CITE总分 = 72 × 0.40 + 58 × 0.15 + 81 × 0.20 + 65 × 0.25 = 69.9
评级标准：90-100 优秀 | 75-89 良好 | 60-74 中等 | 40-59 较低 | 0-39 较差

Top 5 Priority Improvements

前5项优先级改进方向

Sorted by: weight × points lost (highest impact first)
  1. I01 Knowledge Graph Presence — Create entity entry in Google Knowledge Graph
    • Current: Fail | Potential gain: 1.5 weighted points
    • Action: Create Wikidata entry for CloudHost Inc. with P856 (website), P452 (industry), P571 (inception)
  2. C05 AI Citation Volume — Increase citations in AI-generated answers
    • Current: Partial | Potential gain: 2.0 weighted points
    • Action: Optimize top 10 pages for GEO; add definitive statements AI can quote directly
  3. I03 Brand SERP Control — Branded SERP shows only 4 of 10 results from owned properties
    • Current: Partial | Potential gain: 0.75 weighted points
    • Action: Claim Google Business Profile; build out social profiles; create CrunchBase entry
  4. E04 Content Freshness Cadence — 40% of content is >12 months without update
    • Current: Partial | Potential gain: 1.25 weighted points
    • Action: Establish monthly content refresh schedule; prioritize top 20 traffic pages
  5. I05 Schema.org Completeness — Organization schema missing sameAs, founder, foundingDate
    • Current: Partial | Potential gain: 0.75 weighted points
    • Action: Add complete Organization schema with sameAs links to Wikidata, LinkedIn, CrunchBase
排序依据：权重 × 丢失分数（影响程度从高到低）
  1. I01 知识图谱存在性 — 在Google知识图谱中创建实体条目
    • 当前状态：未通过 | 潜在提升：1.5加权分
    • 操作：为CloudHost Inc.创建Wikidata条目，包含P856（网站）、P452（行业）、P571（成立时间）
  2. C05 AI引用数量 — 增加在AI生成回答中的引用次数
    • 当前状态：部分通过 | 潜在提升：2.0加权分
    • 操作：优化前10个页面以适配GEO；添加AI可直接引用的明确声明
  3. I03 品牌SERP控制 — 品牌SERP仅显示10条结果中的4条来自自有资产
    • 当前状态：部分通过 | 潜在提升：0.75加权分
    • 操作：认领Google商家档案；完善社交资料；创建CrunchBase条目
  4. E04 内容更新频率 — 40%的内容已超过12个月未更新
    • 当前状态：部分通过 | 潜在提升：1.25加权分
    • 操作：建立月度内容更新计划；优先更新前20个高流量页面
  5. I05 Schema.org完整性 — 组织Schema缺少sameAs、创始人、成立日期字段
    • 当前状态：部分通过 | 潜在提升：0.75加权分
    • 操作：添加包含sameAs链接至Wikidata、LinkedIn、CrunchBase的完整组织Schema

Action Plan

行动计划

Quick Wins (< 1 week)

快速实现（<1周）

  • Add sameAs, founder, and foundingDate to Organization schema
  • Claim Google Business Profile for branded SERP control
  • 为组织Schema添加sameAs、创始人及成立日期字段
  • 认领Google商家档案以控制品牌SERP

Medium Effort (1-4 weeks)

中等难度（1-4周）

  • Create Wikidata entry with complete properties and references
  • Optimize top 10 pages with GEO-friendly definitive statements
  • Create or complete CrunchBase, LinkedIn company page profiles
  • 创建包含完整属性及参考资料的Wikidata条目
  • 优化前10个页面，添加适配GEO的明确声明
  • 创建或完善CrunchBase、LinkedIn公司页面资料

Strategic (1-3 months)

战略级（1-3个月）

  • Launch monthly content refresh program targeting stale pages
  • Build topical authority through 3-4 pillar content clusters
  • Pursue digital PR to earn mentions on industry publications (TechCrunch, G2)
  • 启动月度内容更新计划，针对陈旧页面进行优化
  • 通过3-4个支柱内容集群构建主题权威度
  • 开展数字公关，获取行业出版物（TechCrunch、G2）的提及

Cross-Reference with CORE-EEAT

与CORE-EEAT交叉参考

AssessmentScoreRating
CITE (Domain)69.9/100Medium
CORE-EEAT (Content)Run content-quality-auditor on sample pages—
Diagnosis: Low CITE + unknown CORE-EEAT → Run 
/seo:audit-page
on top 5 landing pages to determine whether to prioritize content quality or domain authority first.
评估项得分评级
CITE（域名）69.9/100中等
CORE-EEAT（内容）对样本页面运行content-quality-auditor—
诊断结果：低CITE分 + 未知CORE-EEAT分 → 对前5个落地页运行
/seo:audit-page
，以确定优先提升内容质量还是域名权威度

Recommended Next Steps

推荐后续步骤

  • For entity building: run entity-optimizer to strengthen I-dimension signals
  • For content audit: use content-quality-auditor on key pages
  • For tracking progress: run 
    /seo:report
    with CITE score trends quarterly
undefined
  • 若要构建实体：运行entity-optimizer以强化I维度信号
  • 若要进行内容审计：在关键页面使用content-quality-auditor
  • 若要跟踪进展：每季度运行
    /seo:report
    查看CITE分数趋势
undefined

Tips for Success

成功技巧

  1. Start with veto items — T03, T05, T09 can invalidate the entire score
  2. Identify domain type first — Different types have very different weight profiles
  3. AI citation items (C05-C08) matter most for GEO — Test by querying AI engines with niche-relevant questions
  4. Some items need specialized tools — Knowledge graph queries, AI citation monitoring, and IP diversity analysis may require manual research if tools aren't connected
  5. Pair with CORE-EEAT for full picture — Domain authority without content quality (or vice versa) tells only half the story
  6. Re-audit quarterly — Domain authority changes slowly; quarterly cadence is sufficient for most domain types
  7. Compare against competitors — Absolute scores matter less than relative position in your niche
  1. 先检查否决项 — T03、T05、T09可能使整个分数无效
  2. 先确定域名类型 — 不同类型的权重配置差异很大
  3. AI引用项（C05-C08）对GEO至关重要 — 通过向AI引擎查询 niche相关问题进行测试
  4. 部分项需要专用工具 — 若未连接工具，知识图谱查询、AI引用监控和IP多样性分析可能需要手动研究
  5. 与CORE-EEAT结合以获取完整视角 — 仅有域名权威度或内容质量只能反映部分情况
  6. 每季度重新审计一次 — 域名权威度变化缓慢，对大多数域名类型而言，每季度一次的频率已足够
  7. 与竞品对比 — 绝对分数的重要性低于你在细分领域中的相对位置

Reference Materials

参考资料

  • CITE Domain Rating — Full 40-item benchmark with dimension definitions, scoring criteria, domain-type weight tables, and veto items
  • CITE Domain Rating — 完整的40项基准，包含维度定义、评分标准、域名类型权重表及否决项

Related Skills

相关工具

  • content-quality-auditor — Page-level content audit (CORE-EEAT 80 items) — the sister skill
  • backlink-analyzer — Deep-dive into backlink profile (feeds C dimension data)
  • competitor-analysis — Compare CITE scores across competitors
  • performance-reporter — Track CITE score trends over time
  • geo-content-optimizer — Page-level GEO optimization; CITE C05-C08 provide domain-level context
  • memory-management — Store domain audit results for tracking
  • entity-optimizer — Entity presence audit; complements CITE I dimension
  • content-quality-auditor — 页面级内容审计（CORE-EEAT 80项） — 关联工具
  • backlink-analyzer — 反向链接配置文件深度分析（为C维度提供数据）
  • competitor-analysis — 对比竞品的CITE分数
  • performance-reporter — 跟踪CITE分数随时间的变化趋势
  • geo-content-optimizer — 页面级GEO优化；CITE C05-C08提供域名级上下文
  • memory-management — 存储域名审计结果以进行跟踪
  • entity-optimizer — 实体存在性审计；补充CITE I维度