ciso-review

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

/cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions

/cs:ciso-review — CISO强制质询问题

Command:
/cs:ciso-review <plan>
The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope.
命令:
/cs:ciso-review <plan>
这是一款风险审慎的威胁建模工具。针对任何涉及客户数据或合规范围的生产变更,提出六个必问问题。

When to Run

适用场景

  • Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data
  • Before signing a new vendor with data access
  • Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR)
  • Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries
  • After any near-miss incident
  • 在部署任何涉及PII / PHI / 持卡人数据的系统之前
  • 在与拥有数据访问权限的新供应商签约之前
  • 在合规审计(SOC 2、ISO 27001、HIPAA、GDPR)之前
  • 在任何跨越信任边界的架构决策之前
  • 在发生任何未遂安全事件之后

The Six CISO Questions

六个CISO质询问题

1. Threat Model

1. 威胁模型

What's the STRIDE threat model for this system, and which threat is most likely?
  • Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, DoS, Elevation of Privilege.
  • Pick the top 3 by likelihood × impact.
该系统的STRIDE威胁模型是什么,哪种威胁发生概率最高?
  • 涵盖欺骗(Spoofing)、篡改(Tampering)、抵赖(Repudiation)、信息泄露(Info Disclosure)、拒绝服务(DoS)、权限提升(Elevation of Privilege)。
  • 根据「可能性×影响」选出排名前三的威胁。

2. Blast Radius

2. 影响范围

If this is fully compromised, what data is exposed and how many users are affected?
  • Worst case in plain English.
  • Quantify in dollars via FAIR-based ALE.
如果系统完全被攻陷,会泄露哪些数据,影响多少用户?
  • 用直白语言描述最坏情况。
  • 通过基于FAIR的ALE量化损失金额。

3. Detection

3. 检测机制

What signals indicate compromise, and how long until they're triggered (MTTD)?
  • Logs alone are not detection.
  • Define the detection rule, the alert, and the on-call.
哪些信号表明系统已被攻陷,触发这些信号需要多长时间(MTTD)?
  • 仅日志不算有效检测机制。
  • 明确检测规则、告警方式及值班负责人。

4. Response

4. 响应流程

Is there an IR runbook for this scenario, and has it been tabletop-tested?
  • If no runbook: build one before ship.
  • If untested: tabletop before ship.
针对该场景是否有事件响应(IR)运行手册,且是否经过桌面演练?
  • 若无运行手册:上线前必须制定。
  • 若未演练:上线前必须完成桌面演练。

5. Regulatory Window

5. 监管通报窗口

What's the regulator notification window if this scenario occurs?
  • GDPR: 72h. HIPAA: 60d. State breach laws vary.
  • Pre-write the customer comms template.
如果该场景发生,监管机构的通报时限是多久?
  • GDPR:72小时。HIPAA:60天。各州数据泄露法规要求不同。
  • 预先撰写客户沟通模板。

6. Vendor & Supply Chain

6. 供应商与供应链

Which third-party vendors are in scope, and what's their security posture?
  • Subprocessor list current?
  • DPAs in place?
  • Last security review per vendor?
哪些第三方供应商在合规范围内,他们的安全状况如何?
  • 子处理器列表是否最新?
  • 是否已签署数据处理协议(DPA)?
  • 每个供应商的最近一次安全评审是什么时候?

Workflow

工作流程

bash
python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py
python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py
bash
python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py
python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py

Output Format

输出格式

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

CISO Review: <plan>

CISO评审:<plan>

Date: YYYY-MM-DD
日期: YYYY-MM-DD

Threat Model

威胁模型

  • Top threat: <STRIDE category><description>
  • Likelihood: H/M/L | Impact: H/M/L
  • ALE: $X / year
  • 首要威胁:<STRIDE类别> — <描述>
  • 可能性:高/中/低 | 影响:高/中/低
  • ALE:每年$X

Blast Radius

影响范围

  • Data exposed (worst case): <description>
  • Users affected: N
  • Estimated cost: $X
  • 泄露的数据(最坏情况):<描述>
  • 受影响用户数:N
  • 预估损失:$X

Detection

检测机制

  • MTTD target: X hours
  • Current MTTD: X hours
  • Detection rule: <name>
  • MTTD目标:X小时
  • 当前MTTD:X小时
  • 检测规则:<名称>

Response

响应流程

  • IR runbook: ✅ / ❌
  • Last tabletop: <date>
  • IR运行手册:✅ / ❌
  • 最近一次桌面演练:<date>

Regulatory

监管合规

  • Frameworks in scope: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR
  • Notification window: X hours/days
  • 涉及的框架:SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR
  • 通报窗口:X小时/天

Vendors

供应商情况

  • New vendors added: N
  • DPAs signed: N / N
  • Security reviews complete: N / N
  • 新增供应商数:N
  • 已签署DPA:N / N
  • 已完成安全评审:N / N

Verdict

评审结论

🟢 SHIP | 🟡 MITIGATE THEN SHIP | 🔴 BLOCK
undefined
🟢 可上线 | 🟡 缓解风险后上线 | 🔴 禁止上线
undefined

Routing

关联命令

  • /cs:cto-review
    — architecture alignment
  • /cs:gc-review
    — DPA, regulatory implications
  • /cs:decide
    — log risk acceptance
  • /cs:boardroom
    — for CRITICAL risks
  • /cs:cto-review
    — 架构一致性评审
  • /cs:gc-review
    — DPA、监管影响评审
  • /cs:decide
    — 记录风险接受情况
  • /cs:boardroom
    — 针对重大风险

Related

相关资源

  • Agent:
    cs-ciso-advisor
  • Skill:
    ciso-advisor
  • Compliance:
    ../../../../ra-qm-team/

Version: 1.0.0
  • Agent:
    cs-ciso-advisor
  • Skill:
    ciso-advisor
  • 合规团队:
    ../../../../ra-qm-team/

版本: 1.0.0