Loading...
Loading...
Use when the user asks to design database schemas, plan data migrations, optimize queries, choose between SQL and NoSQL, or model data relationships.
npx skill4agent add alirezarezvani/claude-skills database-designer-- INNER JOIN: only matching rows
SELECT o.id, c.name, o.total
FROM orders o
INNER JOIN customers c ON c.id = o.customer_id;
-- LEFT JOIN: all left rows, NULLs for non-matches
SELECT c.name, COUNT(o.id) AS order_count
FROM customers c
LEFT JOIN orders o ON o.customer_id = c.id
GROUP BY c.name;
-- Self-join: hierarchical data (employees/managers)
SELECT e.name AS employee, m.name AS manager
FROM employees e
LEFT JOIN employees m ON m.id = e.manager_id;-- Recursive CTE for org chart
WITH RECURSIVE org AS (
SELECT id, name, manager_id, 1 AS depth
FROM employees WHERE manager_id IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT e.id, e.name, e.manager_id, o.depth + 1
FROM employees e INNER JOIN org o ON o.id = e.manager_id
)
SELECT * FROM org ORDER BY depth, name;-- ROW_NUMBER for pagination / dedup
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY created_at DESC) AS rn
FROM orders;
-- RANK with gaps, DENSE_RANK without gaps
SELECT name, score, RANK() OVER (ORDER BY score DESC) AS rank FROM leaderboard;
-- LAG/LEAD for comparing adjacent rows
SELECT date, revenue,
revenue - LAG(revenue) OVER (ORDER BY date) AS daily_change
FROM daily_sales;-- FILTER clause (PostgreSQL) for conditional aggregation
SELECT
COUNT(*) AS total,
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE status = 'active') AS active,
AVG(amount) FILTER (WHERE amount > 0) AS avg_positive
FROM accounts;
-- GROUPING SETS for multi-level rollups
SELECT region, product, SUM(revenue)
FROM sales
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS ((region, product), (region), ());migrations/
├── 20260101_000001_create_users.up.sql
├── 20260101_000001_create_users.down.sql
├── 20260115_000002_add_users_email_index.up.sql
└── 20260115_000002_add_users_email_index.down.sql-- Batch update to avoid long-running locks
UPDATE users SET email_normalized = LOWER(email)
WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM users WHERE email_normalized IS NULL LIMIT 5000);
-- Repeat in a loop until 0 rows affecteddown.sqlup.sql| Index Type | Use Case | Example |
|---|---|---|
| B-tree (default) | Equality, range, ORDER BY | |
| GIN | Full-text search, JSONB, arrays | |
| GiST | Geometry, range types, nearest-neighbor | |
| Partial | Subset of rows (reduce size) | |
| Covering | Index-only scans | |
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT TEXT) SELECT ...;JOINselect_relatedincludeswith| Tool | Protocol | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| PgBouncer | PostgreSQL | Transaction/statement pooling, low overhead |
| ProxySQL | MySQL | Query routing, read/write splitting |
| Built-in pool (HikariCP, SQLAlchemy pool) | Any | Application-level pooling |
(2 * CPU cores) + disk spindles2 * vCPUsSELECTpg_last_wal_replay_lsn()| Criteria | PostgreSQL | MySQL | SQLite | SQL Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Complex queries, JSONB, extensions | Web apps, read-heavy workloads | Embedded, dev/test, edge | Enterprise .NET stacks |
| JSON support | Excellent (JSONB + GIN) | Good (JSON type) | Minimal | Good (OPENJSON) |
| Replication | Streaming, logical | Group replication, InnoDB cluster | N/A | Always On AG |
| Licensing | Open source (PostgreSQL License) | Open source (GPL) / commercial | Public domain | Commercial |
| Max practical size | Multi-TB | Multi-TB | ~1 TB (single-writer) | Multi-TB |
| Database | Model | Use When |
|---|---|---|
| MongoDB | Document | Schema flexibility, rapid prototyping, content management |
| Redis | Key-value / cache | Session store, rate limiting, leaderboards, pub/sub |
| DynamoDB | Wide-column | Serverless AWS apps, single-digit-ms latency at any scale |
Use SQL as default. Reach for NoSQL only when the access pattern clearly benefits from it.
| Strategy | How It Works | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hash | | Even distribution | Resharding is expensive |
| Range | Shard by date or ID range | Simple, good for time-series | Hot spots on latest shard |
| Geographic | Shard by user region | Data locality, compliance | Cross-region queries are hard |
| Pattern | Consistency | Latency | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synchronous | Strong | Higher write latency | Financial transactions |
| Asynchronous | Eventual | Low write latency | Read-heavy web apps |
| Semi-synchronous | At-least-one replica confirmed | Moderate | Balance of safety and speed |