founder-mode
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chinese/cs:founder-mode — The Auto-Router
/cs:founder-mode — 自动路由工具
Command:
/cs:founder-mode <question>The single command a founder needs to remember. Routes the question to the right C-role automatically, or triggers if multi-role.
/cs:boardroomThis is the killer command — the answer to "I don't know which slash command to use." Type the question; the system figures out the room.
命令:
/cs:founder-mode <问题>这是创始人只需记住的唯一命令。它会自动将问题路由给对应的高管角色,若涉及多角色则触发。
/cs:boardroom这是核心命令——解决了“我不知道该用哪个斜杠命令”的难题。只需输入问题,系统会自动确定对应的对话场景。
Routing Logic
路由逻辑
The router (via ) does keyword + intent matching:
cs-chief-of-staff| Signal in question | Route |
|---|---|
| burn, runway, fundraise, dilution, model, LTV, CAC | |
| pipeline, win rate, forecast, NRR, churn, ramp | |
| positioning, ICP, message, brand, channel, campaign | |
| roadmap, PMF, JTBD, North Star, RICE, kill | |
| cadence, OKR, scorecard, DRI, operating system, rhythm | |
| hiring, comp, ladder, level, attrition, eNPS, equity | |
| security, threat, breach, compliance, audit, SOC 2 | |
| architecture, scaling, tech debt, SLO, latency | |
| contract, IP, term sheet, regulator, license | |
| strategy, vision, board, M&A, raise, exit | |
| 2+ signals from different roles | |
| ambiguous | |
路由工具(通过)采用关键词+意图匹配:
cs-chief-of-staff| 问题中的信号 | 路由目标 |
|---|---|
| burn(现金流消耗)、runway(现金流储备时长)、fundraise(融资)、dilution(股权稀释)、model(模型)、LTV(客户终身价值)、CAC(客户获取成本) | |
| pipeline(销售漏斗)、win rate(赢单率)、forecast(预测)、NRR(净收入留存率)、churn(客户流失率)、ramp(业绩爬坡) | |
| positioning(定位)、ICP(理想客户画像)、message(品牌信息)、brand(品牌)、channel(渠道)、campaign(营销活动) | |
| roadmap(产品路线图)、PMF(产品市场匹配)、JTBD(用户任务)、North Star(北极星指标)、RICE(优先级评分模型)、kill(砍掉项目) | |
| cadence(工作节奏)、OKR(目标与关键成果)、scorecard(绩效卡)、DRI(直接负责人)、operating system(运营体系)、rhythm(工作节律) | |
| hiring(招聘)、comp(薪酬)、ladder(晋升阶梯)、level(职级)、attrition(人员流失)、eNPS(员工净推荐值)、equity(股权) | |
| security(安全)、threat(威胁)、breach(数据泄露)、compliance(合规)、audit(审计)、SOC 2 | |
| architecture(架构)、scaling(扩容)、tech debt(技术债务)、SLO(服务水平目标)、latency(延迟) | |
| contract(合同)、IP(知识产权)、term sheet(条款清单)、regulator(监管机构)、license(许可证) | |
| strategy(战略)、vision(愿景)、board(董事会)、M&A(并购)、raise(融资)、exit(退出) | |
| 来自不同角色的2个及以上信号 | |
| 模糊不清 | 先触发 |
Workflow
工作流程
- Parse the question for role signals
- If exactly one role: invoke that cs-* agent directly
- If 2+ roles: build a brief via and trigger
/cs:brief/cs:boardroom - If ambiguous / no signal match: trigger to force the founder to sharpen
/cs:office-hours - Log the routing decision (raw layer) via
decision-logger
- 解析问题中的角色信号
- 若匹配到恰好一个角色:直接调用对应的cs-* agent
- 若匹配到2个及以上角色:通过生成简报并触发
/cs:brief/cs:boardroom - 若模糊不清/无匹配信号:触发引导创始人明确问题
/cs:office-hours - 通过记录路由决策(原始层级)
decision-logger
Output
输出结果
The router emits one of three responses:
路由工具会输出以下三种响应之一:
Single-role route
单角色路由
**Routing:** cs-cfo-advisor
**Why:** Question hits burn rate and unit economics.
**Next:** Invoking cs-cfo-advisor with company-context loaded.
[Advisor's response follows]**路由目标:** cs-cfo-advisor
**原因:** 问题涉及现金流消耗率和单位经济效益。
**下一步:** 加载公司上下文信息后调用cs-cfo-advisor。
[顾问的回复将在此显示]Multi-role route
多角色路由
**Routing:** /cs:boardroom
**Why:** Question touches CFO + CMO + CPO (pricing change has finance, positioning, and product implications).
**Next:** Building brief via /cs:brief, then running boardroom.
Brief saved: ~/.claude/briefs/2026-05-12-pricing-v3.md
Run: /cs:boardroom ~/.claude/briefs/2026-05-12-pricing-v3.md**路由目标:** /cs:boardroom
**原因:** 问题涉及CFO + CMO + CPO(定价调整涉及财务、定位和产品层面的影响)。
**下一步:** 通过/cs:brief生成简报,然后启动boardroom。
简报已保存:~/.claude/briefs/2026-05-12-pricing-v3.md
执行:/cs:boardroom ~/.claude/briefs/2026-05-12-pricing-v3.mdAmbiguous → office hours
模糊问题 → 办公时间
**Routing:** /cs:office-hours
**Why:** Question is too broad ("should we grow faster?"). Need framing before any advisor can help.
**Next:** Six-question intake.
[Office hours questions follow]**路由目标:** /cs:office-hours
**原因:** 问题过于宽泛(“我们应该更快增长吗?”)。在顾问提供帮助前需要明确问题框架。
**下一步:** 六个问题的信息收集。
[办公时间的问题将在此显示]Why This Is the Killer Command
为何这是核心命令
gstack requires the founder to know all 23 slash commands and pick the right one. That's a cognitive tax. collapses that to one — the system picks. This is also where persistent memory pays off: with company-context.md + decision-logger, the router knows what's already been decided and won't re-litigate.
/cs:founder-modegstack要求创始人记住全部23个斜杠命令并选择正确的那个,这会带来认知负担。将其简化为一个命令——由系统来选择。这也是持久化内存发挥作用的地方:借助company-context.md和decision-logger,路由工具知晓已做出的决策,不会重复讨论。
/cs:founder-modeExamples
示例
/cs:founder-mode "should we raise a Series B now or wait 6 months?"
→ boardroom (CFO + CEO + CRO touched)
/cs:founder-mode "the win rate dropped 20% this month"
→ cs-cro-advisor
/cs:founder-mode "let's hire a VP Marketing"
→ boardroom (CHRO + CMO + CFO touched)
/cs:founder-mode "should we be growing faster?"
→ /cs:office-hours (too ambiguous)/cs:founder-mode "我们现在应该进行B轮融资还是再等6个月?"
→ boardroom(涉及CFO + CEO + CRO)
/cs:founder-mode "本月赢单率下降了20%"
→ cs-cro-advisor
/cs:founder-mode "我们要招聘一位营销副总裁"
→ boardroom(涉及CHRO + CMO + CFO)
/cs:founder-mode "我们应该更快增长吗?"
→ /cs:office-hours(过于模糊)Related
相关链接
- Agent: — does the routing
cs-chief-of-staff - Skill: — routing logic
chief-of-staff - Skill: — loads context
context-engine
Version: 1.0.0
- Agent: — 负责路由
cs-chief-of-staff - Skill: — 路由逻辑
chief-of-staff - Skill: — 加载上下文
context-engine
版本: 1.0.0