internal-narrative

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Internal Narrative Builder

内部叙事构建工具

One company. Many audiences. Same truth — different lenses. Narrative inconsistency is trust erosion. This skill builds and maintains coherent communication across every stakeholder group.

一家公司，多方受众。事实一致，视角不同。叙事不一致会导致信任流失。本工具可在所有利益相关方群体中构建并维护连贯的沟通内容。

Keywords

关键词

narrative, company story, internal communication, investor update, all-hands, board communication, crisis communication, messaging, storytelling, narrative consistency, audience translation, founder narrative, employee communication, candidate narrative, partner communication

叙事、公司故事、内部沟通、投资者更新、全员大会、董事会沟通、危机沟通、信息传递、故事讲述、叙事一致性、受众适配、创始人叙事、员工沟通、求职者叙事、合作伙伴沟通

Core Principle

核心原则

The same fact lands differently depending on who hears it and what they need.

"We're shifting resources from Product A to Product B" means:

To employees: "Is my job safe? Why are we abandoning what I built?"
To investors: "Smart capital allocation — they're doubling down on the winner"
To customers of Product A: "Are they abandoning us?"
To candidates: "Exciting new focus — are they decisive?"

Same fact. Four different narratives needed. The skill is maintaining truth while serving each audience's actual question.

同一事实，因受众不同、需求各异，传递效果也会不同。

"我们正将资源从产品A转移至产品B"这句话在不同受众眼中的含义：

员工："我的工作安全吗？为什么要放弃我参与开发的产品？"
投资者："明智的资本配置——他们正押注于更具优势的项目"
产品A的客户："他们要放弃我们了吗？"
求职者："令人振奋的新方向——他们是否决策果断？"

事实相同，但需要针对不同受众打造不同叙事。本工具的核心是在满足各受众实际需求的同时，始终坚守事实真相。

Framework

框架

Step 1: Build the Core Narrative

第一步：构建核心叙事

One paragraph that every other communication derives from. This is the source of truth.

Core narrative template:

[Company name] exists to [mission — present tense, specific]. We're building [what you're building] because [the problem you're solving]. Our approach is [your unique way of doing this]. We're at [honest description of current state] and heading toward [where you're going in concrete terms].

Good core narrative (example):

Acme Health exists to reduce preventable falls in elderly care using smartphone-based mobility analysis. We're building an AI diagnostic tool for care teams because current fall risk assessments are subjective, infrequent, and often wrong. Our approach — using the phone's camera during a 10-second walking test — means no new hardware, no specialist required. We have 80 care facilities in DACH paying us €800K ARR, and we're heading to €3M ARR by demonstrating clinical value at scale before our Series B.

Bad core narrative:

Acme Health is an innovative AI company revolutionizing elderly care through cutting-edge technology that empowers care providers and improves patient outcomes across the continuum of care.

The good version is usable. The bad version says nothing.

一段可衍生出所有其他沟通内容的核心文本，这是事实的源头。

核心叙事模板：

[公司名称]旨在[具体的当下使命]。我们正在打造[产品/服务]，以解决[具体问题]。我们的独特方法是[差异化路径]。目前我们处于[真实的现状描述]阶段，正朝着[具体的目标方向]迈进。

优秀核心叙事示例：

Acme Health 旨在通过基于智能手机的移动分析技术减少老年护理中可预防的跌倒事件。我们正在为护理团队打造一款AI诊断工具，因为当前的跌倒风险评估主观、频次低且常常不准确。我们的方法——利用手机摄像头完成10秒行走测试——无需新增硬件，也不需要专业人员操作。我们在DACH地区拥有80家付费护理机构，年经常性收入（ARR）达80万欧元，目标是在B轮融资前通过规模化验证临床价值，将ARR提升至300万欧元。

糟糕的核心叙事示例：

Acme Health是一家创新型AI公司，通过前沿技术变革老年护理，赋能护理提供者，改善患者在整个护理过程中的健康结果。

优秀版本具备实际可用性，而糟糕版本空洞无物。

Step 2: Audience Translation Matrix

第二步：受众适配矩阵

Take the core narrative and translate it for each audience. Same truth, different frame.

Fact	Employees need to hear	Investors need to hear	Customers need to hear	Candidates need to hear
We have 80 customers	"We've proven the model — your work matters"	"Product-market fit signal, capital efficient"	"80 care facilities trust us"	"Traction you'd be joining"
We pivoted from hardware	"We were honest enough to change course"	"Capital-efficient pivot to better unit economics"	"We found a faster, simpler way to serve you"	"We make decisions based on evidence, not ego"
We missed Q2 revenue	"Here's why, here's the plan, here's what you can do"	"Revenue mix shifted — trailing indicator improving"	[Usually don't tell customers revenue misses]	[Usually not shared externally]
We're hiring fast	"The team is growing — your network matters"	"Headcount plan aligned to growth"	[Not relevant unless it affects service]	"This is a rocket ship moment"

Rules:

Never contradict yourself across audiences. Different framing ≠ different facts.
"We told investors growth, told employees efficiency" is a contradiction. Audit for this.
Investors and employees see each other. Board members talk to your team. Candidates google you.

将核心叙事转化为适配各受众的表述，事实不变，视角调整。

事实	员工需要听到的表述	投资者需要听到的表述	客户需要听到的表述	求职者需要听到的表述
我们拥有80家客户	"我们已验证商业模式——你的工作至关重要"	"产品-市场契合信号，资本效率高"	"80家护理机构信任我们"	"你将加入一家已取得初步成果的公司"
我们从硬件业务转型	"我们足够坦诚，及时调整了方向"	"资本高效的转型，优化了单位经济效益"	"我们找到了更快捷、更简单的服务方式"	"我们基于证据做决策，而非固执己见"
我们未达成Q2营收目标	"原因如下，我们的计划是这样，你可以做这些事"	"营收结构发生变化——滞后指标正在改善"	[通常无需告知客户营收未达标]	[通常不对外分享]
我们正在快速招聘	"团队正在壮大——你的人脉资源很重要"	"招聘计划与增长目标对齐"	[除非影响服务，否则无需告知]	"这是公司高速发展的关键时刻"

规则：

跨受众沟通绝不能自相矛盾。视角调整≠事实篡改。
"对投资者强调增长，对员工强调效率"属于矛盾，需对此进行审核。
投资者和员工会相互交流，董事会成员会与团队沟通，求职者会搜索公司信息。

Step 3: Contradiction Detection

第三步：矛盾检测

Before any major communication, run the contradiction check:

Question 1: What did we tell investors last month about [topic]? Question 2: What did we tell employees about the same topic? Question 3: Are these consistent? If not — which version is true?

Common contradictions:

"Efficient growth" to investors + "we're hiring aggressively" to candidates
"Strong pipeline" to investors + "sales is struggling" at all-hands
"Customer-first" in culture + recent decisions that clearly prioritized revenue over customer need

When you catch a contradiction: Fix the less accurate version, then communicate the correction explicitly. "Last month I said X. After more reflection, X is not quite right. Here's the clearer version."

Correcting yourself before someone else catches it builds more trust than getting caught.

在发布任何重要沟通内容前，执行矛盾检查：

问题1：上个月我们就[主题]对投资者说了什么？ 问题2：我们就同一主题对员工说了什么？ 问题3：两者是否一致？若不一致——哪个版本是事实？

常见矛盾：

对投资者说"高效增长" + 对求职者说"我们正在大举招聘"
对投资者说"强劲的销售管线" + 在全员大会上承认"销售陷入困境"
文化口号是"客户优先" + 近期决策明显将营收置于客户需求之上

**发现矛盾时：**修正不准确的版本，然后明确传达更正内容。"上个月我提到了X。经过进一步思考，X并不完全准确。以下是更清晰的表述。"

在他人发现之前主动更正，比被揭穿更能建立信任。

Step 4: Audience-Specific Communication Cadence

第四步：分受众沟通节奏

Audience	Format	Frequency	Owner
Employees	All-hands	Monthly	CEO
Employees	Team updates	Weekly	Team leads
Investors	Written update	Monthly	CEO + CFO
Board	Board meeting + memo	Quarterly	CEO
Customers	Product updates	Per release	CPO / CS
Candidates	Careers page + interview narrative	Ongoing	CHRO + Founders
Partners	Quarterly business review	Quarterly	BD Lead

受众	形式	频次	负责人
员工	全员大会	每月	CEO
员工	团队更新	每周	团队负责人
投资者	书面更新	每月	CEO + CFO
董事会	董事会会议+备忘录	每季度	CEO
客户	产品更新	每次发布	CPO / 客户成功团队
求职者	招聘页面+面试叙事	持续进行	CHRO + 创始人
合作伙伴	季度业务回顾	每季度	业务拓展负责人

Step 5: All-Hands Structure and Cadence

第五步：全员大会的结构与节奏

See

templates/all-hands-template.md

for the full template.

Principles:

Lead with honest state of the company. No spin.
Connect company performance to individual work: "Here's how what you built contributed to this outcome."
Give people a reason to be proud of their choice to work here.
Leave time for real Q&A — not curated questions.

All-hands failure modes:

CEO speaks for 55 of 60 minutes; Q&A is "any quick questions?"
All good news, all the time — employees know when you're not being honest
Metrics without context: "ARR grew 15%" without explaining if that's good, bad, or expected
Questions deflected: "That's a great point, we should follow up on that" → never followed up

完整模板请查看

templates/all-hands-template.md

。

原则：

首先坦诚告知公司现状，不粉饰。
将公司业绩与个人工作关联："以下是你所做的工作如何促成这一成果。"
让员工为选择加入这家公司感到自豪。
留出时间进行真实的问答——而非预先筛选的问题。

全员大会的失败模式：

CEO在60分钟的会议中讲了55分钟，问答环节只问"有没有快速的问题？"
只报喜不报忧——员工能察觉到你不够坦诚
只给出指标却不解释背景："ARR增长了15%"却不说明这是好是坏，是否符合预期
回避问题："这个问题很好，我们后续跟进"→ 从未跟进

Step 6: Crisis Communication

第六步：危机沟通

When the narrative breaks — someone leaves publicly, a product fails, a security breach, a press article.

The 4-hour rule: If something is public or about to be, communicate internally within 4 hours. Employees should never learn about company news from Twitter.

Crisis communication sequence:

Hour 0–4 (internal first):

CEO or relevant leader sends an internal message
Acknowledge what happened factually
State what you know and what you don't know yet
Tell people what you're doing about it
Tell people what they should do if they're asked about it

Hour 4–24 (external if needed):

External statement (press, social) only if the event is public
Consistent with the internal message — same facts, audience-appropriate framing
Legal review if any claims or liability involved

What not to do in a crisis:

Silence: letting rumors fill the vacuum
Spin: people can detect it and it destroys trust
"No comment": says "we have something to hide"
Blaming: even if someone else caused the problem, your audience only cares what you're doing about it

Template for crisis internal communication:

"Here's what happened: [factual description]. Here's what we know right now: [known facts]. Here's what we don't know yet: [honest uncertainty]. Here's what we're doing: [specific actions]. Here's what you should do if you're asked about this: [specific guidance]. I'll update you by [specific time] with more information."

当叙事出现破裂时——比如核心成员公开离职、产品故障、安全漏洞、负面新闻报道。

**4小时规则：**如果事件已公开或即将公开，需在4小时内进行内部沟通。员工绝不应从Twitter等外部渠道得知公司新闻。

危机沟通流程：

第0-4小时（先内部）：

由CEO或相关负责人发送内部消息
如实确认发生的事件
说明已知信息和尚未明确的信息
告知正在采取的行动
指导员工若被问及此事应如何回应

第4-24小时（如需对外）：

仅当事件已公开时发布对外声明（媒体、社交平台）
与内部消息保持一致——事实相同，表述适配外部受众
若涉及索赔或责任，需经过法务审核

危机沟通中的禁忌：

沉默：让谣言填补信息空白
粉饰：人们能察觉，这会摧毁信任
"无可奉告"：等同于"我们有隐瞒"
指责：即使是他人造成的问题，受众只关心你在做什么解决问题

危机内部沟通模板：

"以下是发生的事件：[事实描述]。目前我们已知：[已确认的事实]。尚未明确的信息：[坦诚说明不确定性]。我们正在采取的行动：[具体措施]。若你被问及此事，应这样回应：[具体指引]。我会在[具体时间]前向大家更新更多信息。"

Narrative Consistency Checklist

叙事一致性检查清单

Key Questions for Narrative

叙事核心问题

"Could a new employee explain to a friend why our company exists? What would they say?"
"What do we tell investors about our strategy? What do we tell employees? Are these the same?"
"If a journalist asked our team members to describe the company independently, what would they say?"
"When did we last update our 'why we exist' story? Is it still true?"
"What's the hardest question we'd get from each audience? Do we have an honest answer?"

"新员工能否向朋友解释我们公司存在的意义？他们会怎么说？"
"我们对投资者的战略表述是什么？对员工的表述是什么？两者是否一致？"
"如果记者让我们的团队成员独立描述公司，他们会怎么说？"
"我们上次更新'存在意义'的叙事是什么时候？它是否依然成立？"
"每个受众可能提出的最尖锐问题是什么？我们是否有坦诚的答案？"

Red Flags

警示信号

Different departments describe the company mission differently
Investor narrative emphasizes growth; employee narrative emphasizes stability (or vice versa)
All-hands presentations are mostly slides, mostly one-way
Q&A questions are screened or deflected
Bad news reaches employees through Slack rumors before leadership communication
Careers page describes a culture that employees don't recognize

不同部门对公司使命的描述各不相同
对投资者强调增长，对员工强调稳定（反之亦然）
全员大会以幻灯片为主，单向传递信息
问答环节的问题被筛选或回避
坏消息通过Slack谣言先于领导层沟通传到员工耳中
招聘页面描述的文化与员工实际感受不符

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

与其他高管角色的协作

When...	Work with...	To...
Investor update prep	CFO	Align financial narrative with company narrative
Reorg or leadership change	CHRO + CEO	Sequence: employees first, then external
Product pivot	CPO	Align customer communication with investor story
Culture change	Culture Architect	Ensure internal story is consistent with external employer brand
M&A or partnership	CEO + COO	Control information flow, prevent narrative leaks
Crisis	All C-suite	Single voice, consistent story, internal first

当...时	与...协作	目的...
准备投资者更新	CFO	使财务叙事与公司叙事保持一致
组织架构调整或领导层变动	CHRO + CEO	沟通顺序：先员工，后外部
产品转型	CPO	使客户沟通与投资者叙事保持一致
文化变革	文化架构师	确保内部叙事与外部雇主品牌一致
并购或合作	CEO + COO	控制信息流，防止叙事泄露
危机事件	全体高管团队	统一发声，叙事一致，先内部沟通

Detailed References

详细参考资料

```
references/narrative-frameworks.md
```
— Storytelling structures, founder narrative, bad news delivery, all-hands templates
```
templates/all-hands-template.md
```
— All-hands presentation template

```
references/narrative-frameworks.md
```
— 故事讲述结构、创始人叙事、坏消息传递、全员大会模板
```
templates/all-hands-template.md
```
— 全员大会演示模板