Back to Details

comments

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

/comments

/comments

Purpose

用途

NPRMs have deadlines. The decision to file a comment or not is an attorney call — but the deadline disappearing without a logged decision is the risk. This skill surfaces open comment periods and records decisions.
NPRMs有截止日期。是否提交意见的决策由律师做出——但风险在于截止日期已过却未记录决策。本技能可展示开放的意见征集期并记录决策。

Load context

加载上下文

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/comment-tracker.yaml
→ all tracked NPRMs and their status. 
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/CLAUDE.md
→ default comment decision owner.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/comment-tracker.yaml
→ 所有被跟踪的NPRM及其状态。 
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/CLAUDE.md
→ 默认的意见决策负责人。

Default view — open comment periods

默认视图——开放的意见征集期

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Comment Period Tracker — [date]

意见征集期跟踪器 — [日期]

⏰ Deadline in <14 days

⏰ 截止日期小于14天

IDRegulationDeadlineDays leftDecisionOwner
CMT-001[name][date][N]Undecided[owner]
ID法规截止日期剩余天数决策负责人
CMT-001[名称][日期][N]未决定[负责人]

🟡 Open (>14 days)

🟡 开放中（大于14天）

[same table]
[相同表格]

Recently decided

近期已做出的决策

IDRegulationDecisionRationale
CMT-002[name]Not filing[reason]
Total open: [N] Undecided with deadline <30 days: [N]
undefined
ID法规决策理由
CMT-002[名称]不提交[理由]
总开放数: [N] 截止日期小于30天且未决定的数量: [N]
undefined

Log a decision

记录决策

/regulatory-legal:comments --decide CMT-001
Decision: [filing / not-filing / waived]
Rationale: "[brief — e.g., 'Rule doesn't apply to our model' or 'Filing comment on Section 3']"
Updates tracker. If decision is "filing": prompt for filing deadline reminder (comment deadline minus 5 business days for internal review).
/regulatory-legal:comments --decide CMT-001
Decision: [filing / not-filing / waived]
Rationale: "[简要说明 — 例如，'规则不适用于我们的模型'或'针对第3条提交意见']"
更新跟踪器。如果决策为“提交”：提示设置提交截止日期提醒（意见截止日期减去5个工作日，用于内部审核）。

Notifications

通知

On first detection of an NPRM (populated by reg-feed-watcher): Slack DM to comment decision owner if Slack MCP is configured and 
owner_slack
is set.
Reminder at 14 days before deadline if decision is still "undecided." Reminder at 3 days before deadline if still undecided — elevated urgency.
首次检测到NPRM时（由reg-feed-watcher填充）：若已配置Slack MCP且设置了
owner_slack
，则向意见决策负责人发送Slack私信。
若决策仍为“未决定”，在截止日期前14天发送提醒。若截止日期前3天仍未决定，发送高优先级提醒。

Consequential-action gate (submit a regulatory comment / respond to a regulator)

重大操作审核环节（提交监管意见/回复监管机构）

Before logging a decision as "filing" — and always before producing a comment letter or regulator-response draft for submission: Read 
## Who's using this
in ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/CLAUDE.md. If the Role is Non-lawyer:
Submitting a comment or response to a regulator has legal consequences. It's a public statement of the company's position, it's on the record in the rulemaking or enforcement matter, and positions taken here bind the company and can be used against it in subsequent proceedings. Have you reviewed this with an attorney? If yes, proceed. If no, here's a brief to bring to them:
  • The rulemaking or inquiry (regulator, docket, deadline)
  • What the proposed comment/response says and on what sections
  • Open questions and what's unresolved
  • What could go wrong (adverse admissions, inconsistent prior positions, coordination-of-comment concerns with trade associations)
  • What to ask the attorney (should we file at all; should we file jointly through a trade group; are there positions we should not take)
If you need to find a lawyer: your professional regulator's referral service is the fastest starting point (state bar in the US; SRA/Bar Standards Board in England & Wales; Law Society in Scotland/NI/Ireland/Canada/Australia; or your jurisdiction's equivalent).
Do not log a "filing" decision or produce a submission-ready draft past this gate without an explicit yes. Tracking views, deadline reminders, and "not-filing / waived" decisions do not require the gate.
在将决策记录为“提交”之前——以及在生成用于提交的意见函或监管回复草稿之前： 阅读
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/CLAUDE.md
中的
## Who's using this
部分。如果角色为非律师：
向监管机构提交意见或回复会产生法律后果。这是公司立场的公开声明，会被记录在规则制定或执法事项中，此处采取的立场对公司具有约束力，并可能在后续程序中被用于针对公司。你是否已与律师审核过此事？如果是，请继续。如果否，请准备以下内容提交给律师：
  • 规则制定或调查事项（监管机构、案卷编号、截止日期）
  • 拟提交的意见/回复内容及涉及的条款
  • 未解决的问题和待确定事项
  • 可能出现的风险（不利陈述、与先前立场不一致、与行业协会的意见协调问题）
  • 需向律师咨询的问题（我们是否应该提交；是否应通过行业协会联合提交；是否有不应采取的立场）
如果你需要寻找律师：所在地区的专业监管机构推荐服务是最快的途径（美国为州律师协会；英格兰和威尔士为SRA/律师标准委员会；苏格兰/北爱尔兰/爱尔兰/加拿大/澳大利亚为律师协会；或所在司法管辖区的对应机构）。
未获得明确同意前，不得越过此环节记录“提交”决策或生成可提交的草稿。跟踪视图、截止日期提醒以及“不提交/豁免”决策无需经过此审核环节。

What this skill does not do

本技能不具备的功能

  • Draft the comment letter. That is a separate attorney task.
  • Make the filing decision. It tracks the decision; the attorney makes it.
  • Monitor post-comment activity. Once a decision is filed, this tracker's job is done — follow the rulemaking through 
    /regulatory-legal:reg-feed-watcher
    .
The 
comment-decision
gap_type
semantics, the per-send Slack confirmation rule, and the comment-tracker.yaml schema live in the gap-surfacer reference skill — load it before doing substantive work.
  • 起草意见函。这是律师的独立任务。
  • 做出是否提交的决策。本技能仅跟踪决策，决策由律师做出。
  • 监控提交意见后的活动。一旦决策记录为已提交，本跟踪器的任务即完成——通过
    /regulatory-legal:reg-feed-watcher
    跟踪规则制定后续进展。
comment-decision
的
gap_type
语义、每条Slack确认规则以及comment-tracker.yaml的 schema 均存在于gap-surfacer参考技能中——开展实质性工作前请先加载该技能。