draft

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

/draft

Load
```
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
```
→ practice-area templates, jurisdiction, local rules, supervision style.
Use the workflow below.
Match doc type to template. Gather facts from case notes — flag missing, never guess.
Apply jurisdiction formatting. Draft with
```
[FACT NEEDED]
```
,
```
[VERIFY]
```
,
```
[UNCERTAIN]
```
flags inline.
Output with prominent AI-assisted label, student review checklist, supervision routing.

/legal-clinic:draft eviction-answer

/legal-clinic:draft asylum-declaration

加载
```
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
```
→ 业务领域模板、司法管辖区、当地规则、监督模式。
遵循以下工作流程。
将文档类型与模板匹配。从案件记录中收集事实——标记缺失信息，绝不猜测。
应用司法管辖区格式要求。在草稿中嵌入
```
[FACT NEEDED]
```
、
```
[VERIFY]
```
、
```
[UNCERTAIN]
```
标记。
输出时需包含醒目的AI辅助标签、学生审核清单及监督流转指引。

/legal-clinic:draft eviction-answer

/legal-clinic:draft asylum-declaration

Draft: First-Draft Document Generation

草稿：初稿文档生成

Purpose

目的

Students spend enormous time on first drafts of documents where the educational value is in the analysis and strategy, not in formatting a caption or writing "Dear Judge." This skill produces the first draft from case notes and practice-area templates so the student's time goes to the thinking.

Every draft is explicitly a starting point. Not final work product. The student analyzes, revises, and the professor reviews before anything goes anywhere.

学生在文档初稿上花费大量时间，但这些工作的教育价值在于分析和策略，而非格式化标题或撰写"尊敬的法官"这类内容。本技能可根据案件记录和业务领域模板生成初稿，让学生将时间投入到思考环节。

**所有草稿均明确为起点，而非最终工作成果。**学生需进行分析、修订，经教授审核后才可用于其他用途。

Load context

加载上下文

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

→ practice areas, practice-area templates, jurisdiction (state + local court + any local rules ingested), supervision style.

Case notes or intake summary for the facts.

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

→ 业务领域、业务领域模板、司法管辖区（州+当地法院+已导入的当地规则）、监督模式。

案件记录或 intake summary（ intake总结）用于获取事实信息。

Pedagogy check

教学模式检查

Read the supervisor guide for this practice area at

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/guides/<practice-area>.md

. Check the

pedagogy_posture

setting:

guide
(default): Produce the structure and the checklist. Ask the student to draft each section. Give feedback on their draft (register, reading level, required elements, what they missed). Offer to fill a section only when the student has tried once.
assist
: Produce the work product. Flag items for student review. The student edits and learns by reviewing.
teach
: Don't produce the work product. Ask the student to draft it. Give feedback. Ask leading questions when they're stuck. Only show a model paragraph after two attempts, and only the section they're stuck on. Track what they got right and wrong so the supervisor can see progress.

If no guide exists, use

guide

. If the guide exists but doesn't set a posture, use

guide

Whatever the posture, the output always includes: "Pedagogy mode: [assist/guide/teach] — set by your supervisor's guide. This means I [description of what the student did vs what the skill did]."

Jurisdiction assumption. The draft assumes the state, court, and local rules set in CLAUDE.md. Caption format, service requirements, page limits, filing windows, and substantive rules vary materially across jurisdictions and even between courts in the same state. If the matter is in a different court or a different state, confirm with your supervisor before relying on any format, deadline, or argument in the draft.

阅读

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/guides/<practice-area>.md

中对应业务领域的监督指南。检查

pedagogy_posture

设置：

**
```
guide
```
（默认）：**生成结构和清单。要求学生撰写每个章节。对学生的草稿提供反馈（语体、阅读水平、必填要素、遗漏内容）。仅在学生尝试一次后才提供章节填充协助。
**
```
assist
```
：**生成工作成果。标记需学生审核的内容。学生通过审核进行编辑和学习。
**
```
teach
```
：**不生成工作成果。要求学生自行撰写草稿。提供反馈。当学生遇到困难时提出引导性问题。仅在学生尝试两次后展示示例段落，且仅展示其卡住的章节。跟踪学生的对错情况，以便监督者查看进度。

若不存在指南，使用

guide

模式。若指南存在但未设置模式，同样使用

guide

模式。

无论采用哪种模式，输出内容必须包含："教学模式：[assist/guide/teach] — 由您的监督者指南设置。这意味着我[说明学生与技能各自的职责]。"

司法管辖区假设。草稿默认采用CLAUDE.md中设置的州、法院和当地规则。标题格式、送达要求、页数限制、提交窗口期及实体规则在不同司法管辖区甚至同一州的不同法院之间存在显著差异。若案件属于不同法院或不同州，在依赖草稿中的任何格式、截止日期或论点前，请先与监督者确认。

Workflow

工作流程

Step 1: Which document?

步骤1：确定文档类型

Match the request to the clinic's template set (from

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

). Common set by practice area:

Practice area	Documents
Immigration	I-589 asylum application narrative, client declaration, motion to change venue, motion to continue, FOIA request, country conditions summary
Housing	Eviction answer, demand letter (repairs/deposit), motion to stay execution, discovery requests
Family	Protective order petition, custody declaration, motion to modify, financial affidavit
Consumer	Debt validation letter, FDCPA demand letter, answer to collection complaint, motion to vacate default
General litigation	Motion template, notice of appearance, certificate of service

If the requested document isn't in the template set: "The clinic's templates don't include [X]. I can attempt a draft from general principles, but flag this heavily — it hasn't been tuned for your practice area or jurisdiction. Better to ask [Professor] if there's an existing template."

将请求与诊所的模板集（来自

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

）匹配。按业务领域划分的常见模板集：

业务领域	文档类型
移民	I-589庇护申请陈述、客户声明、变更审理地点动议、延期动议、FOIA请求、国家情况摘要
住房	驱逐答辩书、索赔函（维修/押金）、暂缓执行动议、证据开示请求
家庭	保护令请愿书、监护权声明、修改动议、财务宣誓书
消费者	债务验证函、FDCPA索赔函、催收答辩书、撤销默认判决动议
一般诉讼	动议模板、出庭通知、送达证明

若请求的文档不在模板集中："诊所模板不包含[X]。我可以尝试根据通用原则生成草稿，但会重点标记——该草稿未针对您的业务领域或司法管辖区进行优化。最好咨询[教授]是否有现有模板。"

Step 2: Gather the facts

步骤2：收集事实

Read the intake summary or case notes. For each fact the document needs: do we have it?

Document needs	Have?	Source
[fact]	✓ / ✗	[intake / client doc / need to get]

Missing required facts → don't guess. Mark them:

[FACT NEEDED: client's entry date — get from I-94 or ask client]

阅读intake总结或案件记录。针对文档所需的每个事实：我们是否已掌握？

文档所需信息	是否已掌握？	来源
[事实]	✓ / ✗	[intake / 客户文档 / 需要获取]

缺失必填事实 → 绝不猜测。标记为：

[FACT NEEDED: 客户入境日期 — 从I-94获取或询问客户]

。

Step 3: Apply jurisdiction

步骤3：适配司法管辖区

Per

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

jurisdiction:

Caption format: state and local court rules. If local rules were ingested at cold-start, use them. If not, use state default and flag:
```
[VERIFY CAPTION: local rules not loaded — confirm format against [Court]'s current rules]
```
Service requirements: who gets served, how, by when per the court's rules
Local quirks: page limits, font requirements, standing orders. Apply what's ingested; flag what isn't.

根据

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

中的司法管辖区设置：

**标题格式：**遵循州和当地法院规则。若冷启动时已导入当地规则，则使用该规则；若未导入，则使用州默认格式并标记：
```
[VERIFY CAPTION: 未加载当地规则 — 请根据[法院]现行规则确认格式]
```
**送达要求：**按法院规则确定送达对象、方式及截止日期
**当地特殊要求：**页数限制、字体要求、常规命令。应用已导入的规则；标记未导入的内容。

Step 4: Draft

步骤4：生成草稿

Use the practice-area template. Fill what can be filled from facts. Leave placeholders explicit — never fill with plausible-sounding invention.

Everywhere the draft makes a legal assertion: that assertion is a hypothesis the student verifies, not a conclusion the draft guarantees. Mark accordingly.

使用业务领域模板。根据已掌握的事实填充内容。明确保留占位符——绝不使用看似合理的虚构内容填充。

**草稿中的每一项法律主张：**该主张均为需学生验证的假设，而非草稿保证的结论。需相应标记。

Step 5: Flag uncertainty

步骤5：标记不确定内容

Three kinds of flags, in-line:

```
[FACT NEEDED: ...]
```
— the document needs a fact the case notes don't have
```
[VERIFY: ...]
```
— a legal or factual assertion that needs checking before this is filed
```
[UNCERTAIN: ...]
```
— the skill is genuinely unsure and says so rather than guessing

三种嵌入式标记：

```
[FACT NEEDED: ...]
```
— 文档需要案件记录中未包含的事实
```
[VERIFY: ...]
```
— 提交前需核实的法律或事实主张
```
[UNCERTAIN: ...]
```
— 技能确实不确定，如实标记而非猜测

Step 6: Supervision routing

步骤6：监督流转

Filing a document with a court or agency is a consequential action. The gate is the supervision workflow in

## Supervision style

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

, reinforced by the Part 0 role check that confirms a licensed supervising attorney owns the clinic setup. Court filings always route through supervision before filing, regardless of the supervision-style choice.

Per

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

supervision style:

Formal queue: draft goes to queue, student sees "queued for [Professor]"
Configurable flags: if this document type is a flag trigger (court filings usually are), output includes "CHECK WITH [PROFESSOR] BEFORE FILING"
Lighter-touch: standard safeguard label, no additional gate — but court filings still go to the professor before filing per the clinic's existing supervision structure

向法院或机构提交文档是具有重大影响的行为。需遵循

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

中

## Supervision style

（监督模式）的工作流程，并通过第0部分的角色检查确认持牌监督律师负责诊所设置。无论选择何种监督模式，法院提交的文档在提交前必须经过监督审核。

根据

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md

中的监督模式：

**正式队列：**草稿进入队列，学生将看到"已提交至[教授]审核"
**可配置标记：**若该文档类型为触发标记的类型（通常法院提交的文档属于此类），输出内容需包含"提交前请与[教授]确认"
**轻量模式：**标准保障标签，无额外审核环节——但根据诊所现有监督结构，法院提交的文档仍需先提交给教授审核

Output

输出格式

markdown

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  AI-ASSISTED DRAFT — REQUIRES STUDENT ANALYSIS AND ATTORNEY REVIEW
  This is a starting point, not final work product.
  Every [VERIFY] and [FACT NEEDED] flag must be resolved before filing.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

[The document — in the practice-area template format, jurisdiction-aware,
with flags inline]

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

markdown

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  AI辅助生成草稿 — 需学生分析及律师审核
  本稿仅为起点，非最终工作成果。
  所有[VERIFY]和[FACT NEEDED]标记必须在提交前解决。
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

[文档内容 — 采用业务领域模板格式，适配司法管辖区，
嵌入标记内容]

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Student review checklist

学生审核清单

What this draft does NOT do

本草稿不负责以下事项

It does not decide strategy. The draft follows the most common approach for this document type — you decide if that's right for this client.
It does not verify its own legal assertions. Every legal conclusion above is a hypothesis until you research it.
It does not file itself. [Professor] reviews, you file per clinic procedure.

Before this leaves the clinic. This is a student draft for supervising-attorney review, not a final letter, filing, or form. Filing it with a court or agency, or sending it to a client or opposing party, has legal consequences for the client. A licensed supervising attorney reviews, edits, and signs off before it leaves the clinic. Strip the AI-assisted draft header only after that sign-off. Do not send or file this draft without supervisor approval.

ABA Formal Opinion 512 (2024): generative AI use requires competence, supervision, and verification. This draft is designed to be supervised and verified — it is not designed to be trusted without that.

undefined

不制定策略。草稿采用此类文档最常见的处理方式——您需决定是否适合本案客户。
不验证自身法律主张。上述所有法律结论均为假设，需您进行研究验证。
不自动提交。[教授]审核后，您需按诊所流程提交。

本稿离开诊所前须知。本稿为供监督律师审核的学生草稿，非最终信函、提交文件或表格。向法院或机构提交，或发送给客户/对方当事人，会对客户产生法律后果。持牌监督律师需先审核、编辑并签字确认，本稿才可离开诊所。仅在获得签字确认后才可移除AI辅助草稿标题。未经监督者批准，不得发送或提交本草稿。

ABA正式意见512（2024）：生成式AI的使用需具备专业能力、监督及验证。本草稿设计为需监督和验证的版本——未经上述环节不得信任。

undefined

What this skill does NOT do

本技能不负责以下事项

Produce final work product. First draft only. Student revises, professor reviews.
Guess at missing facts. Flags them for the student to get.
Decide the legal theory. Uses the common approach; the student decides if it's the right one for this case.
Replace jurisdiction-specific research. Applies ingested local rules; flags where rules weren't ingested or might have changed.

不生成最终工作成果。仅生成初稿。学生修订，教授审核。
不猜测缺失事实。标记缺失信息供学生补充。
不决定法律理论。采用常见处理方式；学生需决定是否适合本案。
不替代司法管辖区特定研究。应用已导入的当地规则；标记未导入或可能已变更的规则。