international-expansion
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseInternational Expansion Skill
国际扩张技能
Matter context
事项上下文
Matter context. Check in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If is (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run or say ." Load the active matter's for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at . Never read another matter's files unless is .
## Matter workspacesEnabled✗/employment-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug>practice-levelmatter.md~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/Cross-matter contexton事项上下文:查看实践级CLAUDE.md中的部分。如果为(内部用户默认设置),则跳过本段剩余内容——技能将使用实践级上下文,事项机制不可见。如果已启用且没有活跃事项,请询问:“这是针对哪个事项的?请运行或选择。”加载活跃事项的以获取事项特定上下文和覆盖规则。将输出写入事项文件夹:。除非开启,否则不得读取其他事项的文件。
## Matter workspacesEnabled✗/employment-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug>practice-levelmatter.md~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/Cross-matter contextPurpose
目的
International hiring gets handled sloppily at scaleups because nobody owns
the full picture. Legal knows the employment-law questions but not the PE
risk questions. Finance knows the cost model but not the employee-representation
triggers. HR knows the comp benchmarks but not the Day 1 compliance requirements.
This skill doesn't replace any of those functions. It maps the terrain, drafts
the right questions for each stakeholder, produces a briefing request that
walks outside counsel through the country-specific issues, and creates a
tracker that keeps the project moving across sessions.
This skill assumes expansion is decided. It is not a "should we expand?"
framework.
This skill does not contain country-specific employment law. The substantive
rules change frequently and vary by role, headcount, and industry — the skill
routes every country through an outside-counsel briefing rather than relying
on a stored reference table.
在成长型企业中,国际招聘的处理往往不够严谨,因为没有人能掌控全局。法务了解雇佣法律问题,但不懂PE风险问题;财务了解成本模型,但不懂员工代表触发条件;人力资源了解薪酬基准,但不懂入职首日的合规要求。
本技能不会替代任何上述职能,而是梳理整体流程,为各利益相关方起草恰当的问题,生成引导外部法律顾问了解国家特定问题的简报请求,并创建一个跟踪工具,确保项目在各阶段推进。
本技能假设扩张决策已确定,并非“是否应该扩张”的评估框架。
本技能不包含特定国家的雇佣法律条文。具体规则会频繁变化,且因岗位、员工数量和行业而异——本技能会将每个国家的需求引导至外部法律顾问简报,而非依赖存储的参考表格。
Load context
加载上下文
Read → jurisdictional footprint, escalation table, any existing
expansion notes.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md读取 → 获取司法管辖范围、升级流程表、现有扩张记录。
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.mdOutput header
输出页眉
Prepend the work-product header from → (it differs by user role — see ).
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md## Outputs## Who's using this添加中的工作成果页眉 → (根据用户角色不同而有所差异,详见)。
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md## Outputs## Who's using thisWorkflow
工作流程
Step 1 — Information gathering
步骤1 — 信息收集
Ask all of the following in a single block:
Before I build the expansion plan I need to understand the shape of this expansion. Please answer what you can — gaps in the answers are themselves useful data:The expansion
- Which country?
- What roles are you hiring? (Job function matters — a sales rep closing deals creates different legal exposure than an engineer writing code)
- How many hires are planned in the next 12 months?
- When do you need the first person to start?
Current state
- Do you already have a legal entity in this country?
- Have you used an EOR provider before? Are you already considering one?
- Has tax or finance been looped in yet?
- Do you have outside employment counsel in this country?
Strategic context
- Is this a long-term strategic commitment (building a real team) or testing the market (one or two hires, see how it goes)?
- Who is the executive sponsor making the structure decision?
Wait for responses before proceeding.
在一个区块中询问以下所有问题:
在制定扩张计划前,我需要了解本次扩张的具体情况。请尽可能回答以下问题——未回答的空白本身也是有用的数据:扩张详情
- 目标国家是哪个?
- 计划招聘哪些岗位?(岗位职能至关重要——销售代表签订合同带来的法律风险与工程师编写代码完全不同)
- 未来12个月计划招聘多少人?
- 首位员工的预计入职时间是什么时候?
当前状态
- 贵司已在该国设立法律实体吗?
- 之前使用过EOR服务商吗?目前是否在考虑相关服务商?
- 是否已让税务或财务部门参与?
- 在该国是否有合作的外部雇佣法律顾问?
战略背景
- 这是长期战略投入(组建完整团队)还是市场测试(仅招聘1-2人,观察效果)?
- 谁是负责结构决策的高管发起人?
等待回复后再继续下一步。
Step 2 — EOR vs. entity framing
步骤2 — EOR与实体设立的决策框架
Do not make this decision. Frame it with enough precision that the CFO and
tax counsel can make it.
Work through the following factors against the intake answers and produce a
structured framing document:
The core trade-off:
| Factor | Points toward EOR | Points toward Entity |
|---|---|---|
| Headcount in 12 months | Fewer hires | More hires |
| Timeline to first hire | Short runway | Longer runway available |
| Strategic commitment | Testing the market | Long-term presence |
| Cost sensitivity | EOR markup acceptable | Scale makes entity more efficient |
| Control needs | Low — EOR employer handles local HR | High — want direct employer relationship |
| IP sensitivity | Lower | Higher — entity ownership cleaner |
Specific headcount break-even points, EOR markup ranges, setup costs, and
timelines vary by country and provider — do not hardcode them. Route those
questions to tax/finance and the EOR provider.
PE risk flag (route to tax counsel):
If roles include sales, business development, account management, or anyone
with authority to negotiate or sign contracts on behalf of the company —
flag this explicitly:
PE Risk: [Role type] may create a taxable permanent establishment in [country] even before a legal entity exists. This is a tax question, not an employment question. Tax counsel must assess before the first hire.
Produce the question for the CFO/tax:
Questions for your CFO and tax counsel:
- At [N] hires over 12 months, at what headcount does entity setup become more cost-effective than EOR (accounting for EOR markup, setup costs, and ongoing compliance burden)?
- [If PE-risk roles:] Do these role types create a taxable permanent establishment in [country]? If yes, does that change the entity timeline?
- If we start with EOR and convert to entity later, what are the transition risks for the employees already on the EOR?
- Who is our preferred EOR provider for this country, and have we vetted their local compliance track record?
不要直接做出决策,而是构建足够精准的框架,让CFO和税务法律顾问能够做出决策。
结合收集到的信息,梳理以下因素并生成结构化框架文档:
核心权衡因素:
| 因素 | 倾向选择EOR | 倾向选择实体设立 |
|---|---|---|
| 12个月内员工数量 | 招聘人数较少 | 招聘人数较多 |
| 首位员工入职时间线 | 时间紧迫 | 有充足准备时间 |
| 战略投入程度 | 市场测试 | 长期布局 |
| 成本敏感度 | 可接受EOR加价 | 规模效应使实体设立更高效 |
| 管控需求 | 低——EOR雇主负责本地人力资源 | 高——希望直接建立雇佣关系 |
| IP敏感度 | 较低 | 较高——实体所有权更清晰 |
具体的员工数量平衡点、EOR加价范围、设立成本和时间线因国家和服务商而异——请勿硬编码。将这些问题转交给税务/财务部门和EOR服务商。
PE风险标记(转交给税务法律顾问):
如果岗位包括销售、业务开发、客户管理,或任何有权代表公司谈判或签署合同的人员——请明确标记:
PE风险:[岗位类型]可能在[国家]产生应税常设机构,即使尚未设立法律实体。这是税务问题,而非雇佣问题。必须在首位员工入职前由税务法律顾问评估。
向CFO/税务部门提出的问题:
致CFO和税务法律顾问的问题:
- 在12个月内招聘[N]人的情况下,当员工数量达到多少时,实体设立会比EOR更具成本效益(需考虑EOR加价、设立成本和持续合规负担)?
- [若存在PE风险岗位:]这些岗位类型是否会在[国家]产生应税常设机构?如果是,是否会改变实体设立的时间线?
- 如果先使用EOR,之后转为实体设立,对已在EOR下的员工会有哪些过渡风险?
- 针对该国,我们首选的EOR服务商是谁?是否已审核其本地合规记录?
Step 3 — Cross-functional triggers
步骤3 — 跨职能触发机制
For each function that needs to be looped in, state: what they need to do,
and the specific questions legal should ask them. Do not just say "loop in
finance." Draft the ask.
Tax counsel (always required before first hire)
What they need to do: PE risk analysis, determine whether entity is required
for tax purposes, advise on equity tax treatment in this jurisdiction.
Questions legal should ask:
- Does hiring a [role type] in [country] create a permanent establishment or taxable nexus before we have an entity?
- What is our exposure window if we start hiring before the PE question is resolved?
- How are our equity awards (RSUs/options) taxed in [country]? Do we need local tax counsel to advise employees at grant and vesting?
- If we set up an entity, what intercompany services agreement is needed between the subsidiary and the US parent?
Finance / Payroll (required before first paycheck)
What they need to do: identify local payroll provider (or confirm EOR handles
it), budget mandatory employer contributions, set up local banking if entity.
Questions legal should ask:
- Have we identified a local payroll provider? (If EOR: confirm EOR handles payroll including local social contributions)
- What are the mandatory employer contributions in [country] — pension, social insurance, healthcare — and are these budgeted in the comp model?
- How will equity grants be administered for employees in [country]? Has anyone modeled the employer-side tax withholding obligations at vesting?
HR / Total Rewards (required before offer is made)
What they need to do: benefits benchmarking, comp benchmarking against local
market, confirm mandatory vs. supplemental benefits.
Questions legal should ask:
- What benefits are legally mandatory in [country] vs. market-standard? (Do not want to accidentally promise more than required or less than market)
- Is our standard equity package competitive in this market, or does local practice differ significantly?
- Who will be this person's day-to-day manager — local or remote from HQ? (Affects employee-representation analysis and employment agreement terms in some jurisdictions)
Outside counsel (required — do not skip)
What they need to do: research and advise on the local employment framework
for this role and headcount, review/draft local employment agreement, flag
any structural issues with the proposed arrangement.
The outside-counsel briefing request in Step 4 is the agenda for this
engagement. Send it at the start — do not ask piecemeal.
针对每个需要参与的职能部门,说明:他们需要做什么,以及法务应向他们提出的具体问题。不要只说“让财务部门参与”,要起草具体的需求。
税务法律顾问(首位员工入职前必须参与)
需完成的工作:PE风险分析,确定是否因税务原因需要设立实体,就该司法管辖区的股权税务处理提供建议。
法务应提出的问题:
- 在[国家]招聘[岗位类型]是否会在设立实体前产生常设机构或应税关联?
- 如果在PE问题解决前就开始招聘,我们面临的风险窗口有多大?
- 我们的股权激励(RSUs/期权)在[国家]如何征税?是否需要本地税务法律顾问在授予和归属时为员工提供建议?
- 如果设立实体,子公司与美国母公司之间需要签订何种内部服务协议?
财务/薪资部门(首次发薪前必须参与)
需完成的工作:确定本地薪资服务商(或确认EOR是否负责),预算雇主强制缴费,若设立实体则开通本地银行账户。
法务应提出的问题:
- 我们是否已确定本地薪资服务商?(若使用EOR:确认EOR是否负责薪资及本地社保缴费)
- [国家]的雇主强制缴费包括哪些——养老金、社保、医疗保健——这些是否已纳入薪酬模型预算?
- 如何为[国家]的员工管理股权激励授予?是否有人模拟过归属时雇主的税务代扣义务?
人力资源/全面薪酬部门(发放offer前必须参与)
需完成的工作:福利基准调研、本地市场薪酬基准调研、确认法定福利与补充福利。
法务应提出的问题:
- [国家]的法定福利与市场标准福利分别是什么?(避免意外承诺超出法定要求或低于市场水平)
- 我们的标准股权激励方案在该市场是否具有竞争力,还是本地实践差异显著?
- 该员工的日常直属经理是本地人员还是总部远程人员?(在某些司法管辖区会影响员工代表分析和雇佣协议条款)
外部法律顾问(必须参与——不可跳过)
需完成的工作:针对该岗位和员工数量调研并提供本地雇佣框架建议,审核/起草本地雇佣协议,标记拟议安排中的任何结构性问题。
步骤4中的外部法律顾问简报请求是本次合作的议程。请在合作开始时发送,不要零散提问。
Step 4 — Country-specific briefing request
步骤4 — 特定国家简报请求
Instead of a stored country reference table, this skill produces a structured
outside-counsel briefing request. Substantive local law (entity requirements,
statutory benefits and contributions, termination protections, notice periods,
employee-representation / works-council / collective-bargaining obligations,
mandatory leave, restrictive covenants, data protection, work authorization)
varies by country and by role and headcount and by industry, and changes
frequently. Treat every country as a country that requires verification — do
not rely on the skill's own knowledge.
Draft the briefing request below, tailored to the intake answers:
Outside counsel briefing request — [Country]
We are planning to hire [N] employees in [Country] starting [date], in the following roles: [roles]. Target headcount over 12 months: [N]. Preferred structure (subject to your advice and tax counsel): [EOR / entity / undecided]. We need a briefing covering each of the following. Please answer as questions with cites to primary law, not as a reference table — we want to be able to track changes over time.
Entity and engagement structure — what are our options (direct hire via entity, EOR, contractor) and what are the practical and legal trade-offs for this headcount and these roles? Employment contract requirements — what form is required or standard? What must be included? What cannot be included or is unenforceable? What language or translation requirements apply? Termination — what are the notice requirements and severance obligations? How difficult is termination in practice (protected-cause standards, social-selection rules in RIFs, reasonable-notice common-law exposure)? What documentation standard should we establish from day one? Mandatory benefits and employer contributions — what must we provide by law (pension, social insurance, healthcare, paid leave, bonuses)? What are the current employer contribution rates we should budget? Please cite the controlling statute and verify currency. Restrictive covenants — are non-competes enforceable? Under what conditions and with what compensation requirements? What confidentiality and IP assignment language holds up? Employee representation — are there works council, employee representation, union, or collective bargaining requirements? At what headcount do they trigger? What consultation or co-determination rights apply? Are we covered by any sectoral collective agreement even if we are not unionized? Data protection — what obligations apply to employee data? Is there a data transfer mechanism needed for employee data flowing to the US? Work authorization — what permits or visas are required for foreign nationals? What are the processing timelines? Industry-specific rules — are there sector rules, awards, or collective agreements that apply to our industry regardless of whether we are unionized? Contractor/independent-contractor risk — what is the country's test for classification, and what are the deemed-employment or reclassification risks for any contractor arrangements we may consider? Equity / incentive compensation — any local tax, securities, or employment-law rules that govern how we grant RSUs, options, or other equity here? Day 1 compliance — what must be in place before the first employee starts? Registration requirements, notices, filings, posters? Top 2-3 things that surprise US companies hiring here for the first time — what do you wish clients had asked you earlier? What has changed recently that a US team might not have caught?
Add this briefing request to the expansion tracker as a single open item:
owner = Outside Counsel, status = open, with the full briefing agenda in
the questions field. If the jurisdiction is one the team has asked about
before, still send the briefing — this is a currency check, not a first
contact.
本技能不依赖存储的国家参考表格,而是生成结构化的外部法律顾问简报请求。具体的本地法律(实体要求、法定福利与缴费、解雇保护、通知期、员工代表/工会/集体谈判义务、法定休假、限制性条款、数据保护、工作许可)因国家、岗位、员工数量和行业而异,且频繁变化。请将每个国家都视为需要验证的对象——不要依赖本技能自身的知识。
根据收集到的信息起草以下简报请求:
外部法律顾问简报请求——[国家]
我们计划于[日期]起在[国家]招聘[N]名员工,岗位为:[岗位列表]。未来12个月目标员工数量:[N]。首选结构(需经您和税务法律顾问建议):[EOR / 实体设立 / 未确定]。我们需要一份涵盖以下内容的简报。请以带 primary law 引用的问题形式作答,而非参考表格——我们希望能够跟踪随时间的变化。
实体与雇佣结构——我们有哪些选择(通过实体直接雇佣、EOR、承包商),针对该员工数量和岗位,各选项的实际操作与法律权衡是什么? 雇佣合同要求——要求或标准格式是什么?必须包含哪些内容?哪些内容不可包含或无法执行?适用何种语言或翻译要求? 解雇条款——通知要求和遣散义务是什么?实际解雇难度如何(正当理由标准、裁员中的社会选择规则、普通法下的合理通知风险)?从入职首日起应建立何种文档标准? 法定福利与雇主缴费——法律要求我们提供哪些福利(养老金、社保、医疗保健、带薪休假、奖金)?我们应预算的当前雇主缴费比例是多少?请引用相关法规并确认货币单位。 限制性条款——竞业禁止协议是否可执行?在何种条件下需要满足哪些补偿要求?哪些保密和IP转让条款有效? 员工代表——是否存在工会、员工代表、集体谈判要求?达到多少员工数量会触发这些要求?适用何种咨询或共同决定权?即使我们未加入工会,是否受任何行业集体协议约束? 数据保护——员工数据适用哪些义务?员工数据传输至美国是否需要数据转移机制? 工作许可——外籍人士需要哪些许可证或签证?处理时间线是什么? 行业特定规则——是否存在适用于我们行业的部门规则、裁决或集体协议,无论我们是否加入工会? 承包商/独立承包商风险——该国的分类标准是什么?若考虑承包商安排,存在哪些视同雇佣或重新分类的风险? 股权/激励薪酬——在该国授予RSUs、期权或其他股权激励时,受哪些本地税务、证券或雇佣法规约束? 入职首日合规——首位员工入职前必须完成哪些准备工作?注册要求、通知、备案、张贴文件? 首次在该国招聘的美国企业最容易忽略的2-3件事——您希望客户更早询问哪些问题?最近有哪些变化是美国团队可能未注意到的?
将此简报请求添加到扩张跟踪工具中,作为一个单独的未完成项:负责人=外部法律顾问,状态=未完成,问题字段包含完整简报议程。如果团队之前询问过该司法管辖区的相关问题,仍需发送简报——这是为了确认最新信息,而非首次联系。
Step 5 — Create the expansion tracker
步骤5 — 创建扩张跟踪工具
Write a new file to with all open items
identified in Steps 2-4. This file persists across sessions.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/expansion-[country-slug].yamlFormat:
yaml
[WORK-PRODUCT HEADER — per plugin config ## Outputs — differs by role; see `## Who's using this`]
country: [Country name]
country_slug: [lowercase-hyphenated]
kickoff_date: [ISO date]
first_hire_target: [ISO date or "TBD"]
headcount_12mo: [N]
roles: [list]
strategic_commitment: [testing / long-term]
eor_or_entity: [EOR / entity / undecided]
outside_counsel_engaged: [true / false]
pe_risk_flagged: [true / false]
last_updated: [ISO date]
open_items:
- id: 1
category: [structure / tax / finance / hr / outside-counsel / compliance]
item: "[what needs to happen]"
owner: "[function or person]"
status: [open / in-progress / done / blocked]
due: [ISO date or null]
questions:
- "[specific question drafted in Steps 2-4]"
notes: ""
- id: 2
[etc.]Generate one open item per action identified across Steps 2-4. Do not collapse
multiple actions into one item — each item should be completable and
attributable to a single owner.
将所有在步骤2-4中识别的未完成项写入新文件。该文件会在各会话间持续保存。
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/expansion-[country-slug].yaml格式:
yaml
[工作成果页眉 — 按插件配置## Outputs — 根据角色不同而有所差异;详见`## Who's using this`]
country: [国家名称]
country_slug: [小写连字符格式]
kickoff_date: [ISO日期]
first_hire_target: [ISO日期或"TBD"]
headcount_12mo: [N]
roles: [列表]
strategic_commitment: [testing / long-term]
eor_or_entity: [EOR / entity / undecided]
outside_counsel_engaged: [true / false]
pe_risk_flagged: [true / false]
last_updated: [ISO日期]
open_items:
- id: 1
category: [structure / tax / finance / hr / outside-counsel / compliance]
item: "[需要完成的事项]"
owner: "[职能部门或个人]"
status: [open / in-progress / done / blocked]
due: [ISO日期或null]
questions:
- "[步骤2-4中起草的具体问题]"
notes: ""
- id: 2
[以此类推]针对步骤2-4中识别的每个操作生成一个未完成项。不要将多个操作合并为一个项——每个项应可独立完成,并归属给单一负责人。
Step 6 — Output
步骤6 — 输出
Jurisdiction assumption. This plan frames the expansion to the single country identified in intake. Local employment law, tax rules, employee-representation obligations, and data-protection requirements vary materially by country, region, industry, and headcount, and change frequently. Every substantive local-law answer comes from the outside-counsel briefing request, not from this skill. If the plan is adapted for another country later, re-run the briefing.
markdown
[WORK-PRODUCT HEADER — per plugin config ## Outputs — differs by role; see `## Who's using this`]司法管辖假设:本计划针对信息收集中确定的单一国家制定扩张框架。本地雇佣法律、税务规则、员工代表义务和数据保护要求因国家、地区、行业和员工数量而异,且频繁变化。所有具体的本地法律答案均来自外部法律顾问简报请求,而非本技能。若后续计划适配其他国家,请重新运行简报流程。
markdown
[工作成果页眉 — 按插件配置## Outputs — 根据角色不同而有所差异;详见`## Who's using this`]International Expansion: [Country] — [Date]
国际扩张:[国家] — [日期]
First hire target: [date]
Headcount (12 months): [N]
Roles: [list]
Tracker: ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/expansion-[slug].yaml
首位员工入职目标: [日期]
12个月员工数量: [N]
岗位: [列表]
跟踪工具: ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/expansion-[slug].yaml
EOR vs. Entity
EOR与实体设立决策
[Framing from Step 2 — table, PE risk flag if applicable, questions for CFO/tax]
[步骤2中的框架——表格、PE风险标记(如适用)、致CFO/税务部门的问题]
Who needs to be looped in — and what to ask them
需要参与的部门及提问内容
Tax counsel — [N] questions
[Questions from Step 3]
Finance / Payroll — [N] questions
[Questions from Step 3]
HR / Total Rewards — [N] questions
[Questions from Step 3]
Outside counsel — see briefing request below
[Full briefing request from Step 4]
税务法律顾问 — [N]个问题
[步骤3中的问题]
财务/薪资部门 — [N]个问题
[步骤3中的问题]
人力资源/全面薪酬部门 — [N]个问题
[步骤3中的问题]
外部法律顾问 — 详见下方简报请求
[步骤4中的完整简报请求]
Open items ([N] total)
未完成项(共[N]项)
| # | Item | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [item] | [owner] | Open |
| [etc.] |
Run to update status
as items close.
/employment-legal:expansion-update [country]undefined| # | 事项 | 负责人 | 状态 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [事项内容] | [负责人] | 未完成 |
| [以此类推] |
运行以更新事项完成状态。
/employment-legal:expansion-update [country]undefinedWhat this skill does NOT do
本技能不包含的内容
- Advise on specific local employment law — that is outside counsel's job.
- Make the EOR vs. entity decision — frames it for the right decision-makers.
- Draft the local employment agreement — flags that outside counsel must do this.
- State country-specific rules from its own knowledge — every country is routed through an outside-counsel briefing.
- Substitute for outside counsel engagement — every new country requires local counsel, no exceptions.
- 提供特定本地雇佣法律建议——这是外部法律顾问的职责。
- 做出EOR与实体设立的决策——仅为合适的决策者构建决策框架。
- 起草本地雇佣协议——标记该工作必须由外部法律顾问完成。
- 凭借自身知识陈述特定国家规则——每个国家的需求都会引导至外部法律顾问简报。
- 替代外部法律顾问的参与——每个新国家都需要本地法律顾问,无一例外。