Back to Details

policy-drafting

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

/policy-drafting

/policy-drafting

  1. Load 
    ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md
    → jurisdictional footprint, handbook location.
  2. Use the workflow below.
  3. Draft core policy. Check each jurisdiction in footprint for required variants.
  4. Output: core policy + state supplements. Flag where law is currently shifting.
  1. 加载
    ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md
    → 获取司法管辖区覆盖范围、员工手册位置。
  2. 遵循以下工作流程。
  3. 起草核心政策。检查覆盖范围内的每个司法管辖区，确定是否需要变体条款。
  4. 输出内容：核心政策 + 州级补充条款。标记当前法律正在发生变化的领域。

Matter context

事项上下文

Matter context. Check 
## Matter workspaces
in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If 
Enabled
is 
✗
(the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run 
/employment-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug>
or say 
practice-level
." Load the active matter's 
matter.md
for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at 
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/
. Never read another matter's files unless 
Cross-matter context
is 
on
.
事项上下文。查看业务级CLAUDE.md中的
## Matter workspaces
部分。如果
Enabled
为
✗
（内部用户默认设置），则跳过本段剩余内容——技能将使用业务级上下文，事项机制不可见。如果已启用且没有活跃事项，请询问：“这是针对哪个事项的？请运行
/employment-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug>
或说明‘业务级’。”加载活跃事项的
matter.md
以获取事项特定上下文和覆盖规则。将输出写入事项文件夹：
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/
。除非
Cross-matter context
开启，否则不得读取其他事项的文件。

Purpose

目的

A policy that's right for California may be wrong (or unnecessary) in Texas. This skill drafts a core policy and generates state supplements where the footprint requires different rules.
适用于加利福尼亚州的政策可能在得克萨斯州并不适用（或无需存在）。本技能会起草一份核心政策，并针对覆盖范围内需要不同规则的地区生成州级补充条款。

Load context

加载上下文

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md
→ jurisdictional footprint, handbook location and format.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md
→ 获取司法管辖区覆盖范围、员工手册位置及格式。

Workflow

工作流程

Step 1: Scope the policy

步骤1：确定政策范围

  • What's the policy for? (Remote work, parental leave, social media, etc.)
  • Why now? (Legal requirement, incident, growth, gap noticed)
  • Who does it apply to? (All employees, certain roles, certain locations)
  • 政策针对什么内容？（远程办公、育儿假、社交媒体等）
  • 为何现在制定？（法律要求、事件发生、业务增长、发现政策缺口）
  • 适用对象是谁？（所有员工、特定岗位、特定地区员工）

Step 2: Jurisdictional scan

步骤2：司法管辖区扫描

For each state/country in the footprint, check: does this jurisdiction have a specific rule on this topic?
Common topics with jurisdictional variance:
TopicVariance
Paid leaveState mandates (CA, NY, CO, WA, etc.) with different accrual rates, uses, carryover
Parental leaveState programs layer on top of FMLA (CA PFL, NY PFL, etc.)
Meal and rest breaksCA is the outlier (penalty pay); most states minimal
Expense reimbursementCA requires; most states don't
Pay transparencyGrowing list of states requiring ranges in postings
Non-competesSee hiring-review skill — unenforceable in some states
Final payTiming varies widely
If the topic has no jurisdictional variance (dress code, say), skip this step.
针对覆盖范围内的每个州/国家，检查：该司法管辖区是否有关于此主题的特定规则？
存在司法管辖区差异的常见主题：
主题差异内容
带薪休假州级强制规定（CA、NY、CO、WA等），包含不同的累积率、使用规则、结转规则
育儿假州级计划叠加在FMLA之上（CA PFL、NY PFL等）
用餐与休息时间CA是特例（违规罚款）；大多数州要求极少
费用报销CA强制要求；大多数州无要求
薪资透明度越来越多的州要求在招聘信息中注明薪资范围
竞业禁止协议参见招聘审核技能——在部分州不可执行
最终薪资发放时间要求差异极大
如果该主题不存在司法管辖区差异（例如着装规范），则跳过此步骤。

Step 3: Draft the core policy

步骤3：起草核心政策

One policy. Applies everywhere. Clear and readable — employees should understand it without a lawyer.
Structure:
  • Purpose (one sentence — why this policy exists)
  • Scope (who it applies to)
  • The rule (what's required/permitted/prohibited)
  • Process (how to request, who approves, what happens if)
  • Questions (who to ask)
Avoid: "heretofore," "notwithstanding," nested exceptions. This is a handbook policy, not a contract.
一份适用于所有地区的核心政策。内容清晰易懂——员工无需律师解读即可理解。
结构：
  • 目的（一句话说明政策存在的原因）
  • 范围（适用对象）
  • 规则（要求/允许/禁止的内容）
  • 流程（申请方式、审批主体、违规处理）
  • 咨询渠道（可咨询的人员）
避免使用：“迄今为止”、“尽管如此”、嵌套例外条款。这是员工手册政策，而非合同。

Step 4: State supplements

步骤4：州级补充条款

For each jurisdiction where the rule differs, a supplement:
markdown
undefined
针对每个规则存在差异的司法管辖区，撰写补充条款：
markdown
undefined

[State] Supplement

[州名]补充条款

Employees working in [State] are subject to the following in addition to / instead of the core policy:
  • [Specific difference]
  • [Cite the state law if helpful]

Keep supplements tight. Only what's different — don't repeat the core.
在[州名]工作的员工除核心政策外，还需遵守以下条款（或替代核心政策相关内容）：
  • [具体差异内容]
  • [如有帮助可引用州级法律条文]

补充条款需简洁。仅列出差异内容——无需重复核心政策。

Step 5: Cross-check

步骤5：交叉检查

  • Does this policy conflict with anything already in the handbook?
  • Does it promise more than the company intends to deliver? (A policy is a promise — courts hold employers to handbook promises.)
  • Does it inadvertently create a contract? (Some states treat handbook policies as contractual — include the standard "this is not a contract" language if the handbook doesn't already.)
  • 本政策是否与员工手册中现有内容存在冲突？
  • 本政策是否做出了超出公司预期的承诺？（政策等同于承诺——法院会要求雇主履行员工手册中的承诺。）
  • 本政策是否无意中构成了合同？（部分州将员工手册政策视为合同——如果手册中未包含标准的“本内容非合同”声明，请添加该内容。）

Output

输出格式

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

[Policy Name]

[政策名称]

Core Policy

核心政策

[Full text]
[完整文本]

State Supplements

州级补充条款

[State 1]

[州名1]

[Supplement]
[补充内容]

[State 2]

[州名2]

[Supplement]
[补充内容]

Drafting Notes (internal — remove before handbook insertion)

起草说明（内部使用——插入手册前删除）

  • Jurisdictional scan: [which states checked, which have variance]
  • Conflicts with existing handbook: [none | list]
  • Law currently shifting: [any state where this is in flux]
  • Review cadence: [when to revisit — annual, or when X happens]

> **Draft, not a policy in effect.** This is a drafting aid for attorney review, not a policy you can publish. Publishing a handbook policy has legal consequences — in several states it can bind the company as a contractual promise, and wage/leave/accommodation policies are routinely read against the employer. A licensed attorney, solicitor, barrister, or other authorised legal professional in your jurisdiction reviews, edits as needed, and takes professional responsibility before the policy is rolled out. Do not publish or distribute this draft unreviewed.
  • 司法管辖区扫描情况：[已检查的州名，存在差异的州名]
  • 与现有手册的冲突：[无 | 列表]
  • 当前法律变化：[法律处于变动中的州名]
  • 复审周期：[复审时间——年度，或当X事件发生时]

> **注意：本内容为草稿，非生效政策。** 这是供律师审核的起草辅助工具，不可直接发布。发布员工手册政策会产生法律后果——在多个州，政策会对公司产生合同约束力，薪资/休假/ accommodation政策通常会被用于对雇主不利的解读。在政策推行前，需由您所在司法管辖区的执业律师、事务律师、 barrister或其他授权法律专业人员进行审核、必要的修改，并承担专业责任。请勿未经审核即发布或分发本草稿。

Handoff

交接

To handbook-updates skill: when this policy is approved, it diffs against the current handbook and flags what changes.
对接handbook-updates技能：当本政策获批后，将与当前员工手册进行差异对比，并标记变更内容。

What this skill does not do

本技能不提供的功能

  • Approve the policy. It drafts; a human approves.
  • Roll out the policy. Communication to employees is an HR workflow.
  • Cover every jurisdiction on earth — only the ones in the footprint. If the footprint expands, re-run.
  • 政策审批。本技能仅负责起草；需由人工进行审批。
  • 政策推行。向员工传达政策属于HR工作流程。
  • 覆盖全球所有司法管辖区——仅覆盖指定范围内的地区。若覆盖范围扩大，请重新运行本技能。