Back to Details

ramp

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

/ramp

/ramp

  1. Check 
    ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
    is set up. If placeholders: "Ask [professor] to run 
    /legal-clinic:cold-start-interview
    first."
  2. Use the walkthrough below.
  3. Walk through: clinic context (from handbook) → commands → practice exercises (fake intake, practice draft, research roadmap) → verification habits.
  4. --card
    : generate the one-page reference card.
/legal-clinic:ramp
/legal-clinic:ramp --card
  1. 检查
    ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
    是否已配置。如果存在占位符：“请让[教授]先运行
    /legal-clinic:cold-start-interview
    。”
  2. 使用下方的引导流程。
  3. 引导流程：诊所背景（来自手册）→ 命令说明 → 练习环节（模拟客户接待、模拟文书起草、研究路线图）→ 验证习惯培养。
  4. --card
    ：生成单页参考卡片。
/legal-clinic:ramp
/legal-clinic:ramp --card

Ramp: Semester Onboarding

Ramp：学期入职引导

Purpose

目的

Every semester, the clinic loses its entire workforce and rebuilds from scratch. New students need to learn procedures, case management, filing conventions, and practice-area basics before they're useful. Traditionally that takes weeks of reading PDFs and asking the professor the same questions every semester.
This skill is the guided walkthrough. It reads what the professor uploaded during cold-start — the handbook, the filing guides, the local rules — and teaches it interactively, with practice exercises so students try the tools in a low-stakes setting before a real client is on the line.
Audience: students. Professors don't run this (they run 
/cold-start-interview
).
每学期，诊所都会迎来全新的学生团队并完成重建。新学生需要学习流程、案件管理、归档规范和业务领域基础知识后才能投入工作。传统方式需要数周时间阅读PDF文档，并且每学期学生都会向教授重复提出相同的问题。
本技能提供交互式引导流程。它会读取教授在冷启动阶段上传的内容——手册、归档指南、当地规则，并通过互动方式进行教学，搭配练习环节让学生在低风险环境下试用工具，之后再对接真实客户。
受众：学生。教授无需运行此技能（他们运行
/cold-start-interview
）。

Load context

加载上下文

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
→ clinic profile, practice areas, jurisdiction, handbook path, supervision style, practice-area templates.
If that file is missing or still has placeholders: "The clinic hasn't been set up yet. Ask [supervising professor] to run 
/cold-start-interview
first."
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
→ 诊所概况、业务领域、管辖区域、手册路径、监督模式、业务领域模板。
如果该文件缺失或仍存在占位符：“诊所尚未完成设置。请让[指导教授]先运行
/cold-start-interview
。”

The walkthrough

引导流程

Opening

开场

Welcome to [clinic name]. I'm going to walk you through how this clinic works and how to use these tools — about twenty minutes, and you can pause anytime. By the end you'll have run a practice intake, drafted a practice document, and you'll know what to do when you get your first real case.
One thing up front: everything I generate is a starting point, not a final answer. You do the analysis. [Professor] reviews your work [per supervision style]. I handle the formatting and the first draft so you spend your time on the lawyering, not on writing "Dear Judge" for the twentieth time.
欢迎加入[诊所名称]。我将引导你了解诊所的运作方式及工具使用方法——全程约20分钟，你可以随时暂停。结束后，你将完成一次模拟客户接待、起草一份模拟文书，并了解接到第一个真实案件时的处理流程。
提前说明一点：我生成的所有内容都是起点，而非最终答案。分析工作由你完成。[教授]会按照[监督模式]审核你的工作。我负责格式整理和初稿撰写，让你能专注于法律工作，而非重复撰写“尊敬的法官”这类内容。

Part 1: This clinic (5 min)

第一部分：诊所介绍（5分钟）

Read from 
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
and the ingested handbook. Cover, interactively:
  • Practice areas — what the clinic handles, what it doesn't (and where to refer if someone walks in with an out-of-scope issue)
  • Clients — who they are, what they're facing, languages
  • Jurisdiction — which courts, which judges, what the local quirks are
  • Case management — how cases are tracked, where files live, what a well-documented case looks like
  • Supervision — how review works in this clinic (per the supervision style in CLAUDE.md). Be specific: "Before anything goes to a client or a court, [it goes in the review queue / you check with Professor X / etc.]"
Don't lecture — check understanding. "So if a client comes in with an eviction notice but also mentions they're undocumented, what do you do?" (Answer: both issues get noted in intake; the immigration question may need a referral or a flag to the professor, depending on the clinic's scope.)
读取
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
和已导入的手册内容，以互动方式涵盖以下内容：
  • 业务领域——诊所处理的案件类型、不处理的案件类型（以及此类案件的转介渠道）
  • 客户群体——客户身份、面临的问题、使用语言
  • 管辖区域——涉及的法院、法官、当地司法特点
  • 案件管理——案件跟踪方式、文件存储位置、规范的案件文档标准
  • 监督机制——诊所的审核流程（依据CLAUDE.md中的监督模式）。需具体说明：“任何提交给客户或法院的内容，都需要[进入审核队列 / 先向X教授确认 / 等]”
避免单向讲解——要检查学生的理解情况。例如：“如果一名客户带着驱逐通知前来，同时提到自己是无身份移民，你该怎么做？”（答案：在接待记录中同时记录两个问题；移民问题可能需要转介或向教授报备，具体取决于诊所的业务范围。）

Part 2: The commands (5 min)

第二部分：命令说明（5分钟）

Walk through each command the student will actually use:
CommandWhen you use itWhat you get
/client-intake
Client interviewFormatted case summary with issues spotted, conflict flags, triage
/draft [doc type]
Need a first draft of a common documentPractice-area template filled from case notes — starting point, not final
/memo
Need to analyze a case internallyIRAC-format memo with research gaps flagged
/research-start [issue]
Starting legal researchRoadmap: statutes to check, case law areas, search terms — leads, not authoritative cites
/status [audience]
Updating someone on a caseSummary tailored to client / professor / court
/client-letter [type]
Routine correspondenceAppointment confirm, doc request, status update from templates
For each: what it does, what it explicitly doesn't do, what the student verifies before relying on it.
逐一讲解学生实际会用到的命令：
命令使用场景输出内容
/client-intake
客户访谈格式化的案件摘要，包含识别出的问题、利益冲突标记、优先级分类
/draft [doc type]
需要起草常见文书初稿根据案件笔记填充的业务领域模板——仅为起点，非终稿
/memo
需要内部分析案件IRAC格式的备忘录，标记出研究空白
/research-start [issue]
启动法律研究研究路线图：需查阅的法规、判例领域、搜索关键词——仅为线索，非权威引用
/status [audience]
向相关方更新案件状态针对客户/教授/法院定制的摘要内容
/client-letter [type]
常规通信基于模板生成的预约确认、文书请求、状态更新信件
针对每个命令：说明功能、明确不具备的功能、以及学生在依赖输出前需要验证的内容。

Part 3: Practice exercises (8-10 min)

第三部分：练习环节（8-10分钟）

Low-stakes. Fake client. Real tools.
Exercise 1 — Practice intake:
Here's a fake client scenario: [practice-area-appropriate hypo — e.g., for a housing clinic, "Maria got a 3-day notice to quit last Tuesday. She's two months behind on rent after losing her job. The apartment has had a broken heater since November. She has two kids."]
Run 
/client-intake
and interview me as if I'm Maria. I'll answer as Maria would. At the end, look at the case summary it produces — what issues did it spot? Did it catch the habitability defense?
Debrief: what the intake caught, what the student should have probed deeper on, what gets flagged for the professor.
Exercise 2 — Practice draft:
Using Maria's intake, run 
/draft eviction-answer
. You'll get a first draft.
Read it. What's right about it? What's wrong? What would you change before showing it to [Professor]?
The point: the draft is competent but not final. The student learns to read critically, not accept.
Exercise 3 — Research roadmap:
Run 
/research-start "habitability defense to eviction in [state]"
. You'll get a roadmap — statutes, case law areas, search terms.
None of those citations are verified. That's on purpose. Pick one statute from the roadmap and tell me how you'd verify it's current and applies here.
The point: 
/research-start
is a starting place, not a citation. The student still does the research.
低风险场景。模拟客户。真实工具。
练习1——模拟客户接待：
以下是模拟客户场景：[符合业务领域的假设案例——例如，住房诊所：“Maria上周二收到了3天退租通知。她失业后已拖欠两个月房租。公寓的暖气从11月起就坏了。她有两个孩子。”]
运行
/client-intake
，将我当作Maria进行访谈。我会以Maria的身份回答问题。结束后查看生成的案件摘要——它识别出了哪些问题？是否捕捉到了宜居性抗辩点？
复盘：接待工具捕捉到的内容、学生需要进一步追问的点、以及需要向教授标记的事项。
练习2——模拟文书起草：
基于Maria的接待记录，运行
/draft eviction-answer
。你将得到一份初稿。
阅读初稿。哪些内容是正确的？哪些存在问题？在提交给[教授]前你会做哪些修改？
核心目的：初稿质量合格但并非终稿。学生需要学会批判性阅读，而非直接接受输出内容。
练习3——研究路线图：
运行
/research-start "habitability defense to eviction in [state]"
。你将得到一份研究路线图——包含法规、判例领域、搜索关键词。
这些引用均未经过验证，这是有意设置的。从路线图中选择一项法规，告诉我你将如何验证它的时效性及适用性。
核心目的：
/research-start
仅为起点，而非权威引用。学生仍需独立完成研究工作。

Part 4: Verification habits (2 min)

第四部分：验证习惯培养（2分钟）

The habits that matter:
  • Every output is a starting point. If it went to a client or a court without you reading it critically, something went wrong.
  • Verify every citation before it goes in anything. 
    /research-start
    gives leads, not authorities.
  • Check jurisdiction-specific details. The plugin knows your state from setup, but local court quirks change — double-check against current local rules.
  • When uncertain, it says so. If an output has a 
    [UNCERTAIN: ...]
    flag, that's a prompt to research or ask the professor, not to delete the flag and move on.
  • [Supervision reminder per CLAUDE.md style] — what gets reviewed before it goes out, and how.
需养成的关键习惯：
  • 所有输出均为起点。如果未经过批判性阅读就提交给客户或法院，说明流程存在问题。
  • 所有引用必须验证后才能使用。
    /research-start
    仅提供线索，而非权威依据。
  • 核查管辖区域的具体细节。插件会从设置中获取所在州信息，但当地法院的特殊规则可能会变化——需对照最新的当地规则再次确认。
  • 存疑时明确标记。如果输出中带有
    [UNCERTAIN: ...]
    标记，这提示你需要进一步研究或向教授咨询，而非删除标记后继续推进。
  • [依据CLAUDE.md中的监督模式提醒]——哪些内容需要在提交前审核，以及审核流程。

Closing

结束语

That's it. You've run an intake, drafted a document, and built a research roadmap. Your first real case will feel similar, except the client is real and the professor is reading your work.
The one-page reference card: 
/ramp --card
引导流程到此结束。你已完成客户接待、文书起草和研究路线图制定。你的第一个真实案件流程与此类似，区别在于客户是真实的，且教授会审核你的工作。
如需单页参考卡片：运行
/ramp --card

/ramp --card

/ramp --card

Generate the one-page student reference card per the one-page card spec. Contents:
  • The commands (table from Part 2, condensed)
  • What Claude can help with / what it can't (starting points yes, final work product no, authoritative citations no)
  • Verification habits (the bullets from Part 4)
  • Who to ask when stuck (professor name from CLAUDE.md)
Printable. One page. Hand it out on day one.
根据单页卡片规范生成学生参考卡片。内容包括：
  • 命令列表（来自第二部分的表格，精简版）
  • Claude能提供的帮助/无法完成的工作（支持生成起点内容，不支持生成终稿及权威引用）
  • 验证习惯（第四部分的要点）
  • 遇到问题时的咨询对象（来自CLAUDE.md的教授姓名）
可打印。单页格式。在入职首日发放。

What this skill does NOT do

本技能不具备的功能

  • Replace the professor's orientation. It covers procedures and tools; the professor covers judgment, strategy, and the things you only learn by watching someone good do it.
  • Teach substantive law. Practice-area orientation, not a doctrinal course.
  • Certify the student as ready. The professor decides when a student takes a real case.
  • 替代教授的入职培训。本技能仅涵盖流程和工具；教授负责传授判断能力、策略思维，以及只有通过观察资深人士实操才能学到的经验。
  • 教授实体法知识。仅提供业务领域入门指引，而非教义课程。
  • 认证学生具备工作能力。学生何时能接手真实案件由教授决定。