Back to Details

supervisor-review-queue

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

/supervisor-review-queue

/supervisor-review-queue

  1. Check 
    ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
    → supervision style. If NOT "formal review queue": explain the clinic is set up for [flags/lighter-touch], no formal queue exists, and how to switch.
  2. Use the workflow below.
  3. Default: show what's waiting, by urgency, by student.
  4. Actions: approve / edit-then-approve / return with note. All logged.
/legal-clinic:supervisor-review-queue
/legal-clinic:supervisor-review-queue --approve Q-003
/legal-clinic:supervisor-review-queue --return Q-004 "Check the service requirement — local rules changed"
  1. 检查
    ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
    → 监管模式。若未选择“正式审核队列”：说明诊所当前采用[标记/轻量监管]模式，不存在正式队列，并告知切换方法。
  2. 遵循以下工作流程。
  3. 默认：按紧急程度、学生展示待审核项。
  4. 操作：批准/编辑后批准/附说明退回。所有操作均会记录。
/legal-clinic:supervisor-review-queue
/legal-clinic:supervisor-review-queue --approve Q-003
/legal-clinic:supervisor-review-queue --return Q-004 "Check the service requirement — local rules changed"

Supervisor Review Queue (Optional)

教授审核队列（可选）

Purpose

目的

Some clinics want a formal gate: student drafts, professor reviews, output releases. Others find that too prescriptive — they supervise through case rounds and one-on-ones, not through a queue.
This skill is only active if 
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
→ Supervision style is "formal review queue." Otherwise it's dormant — the cold-start interview asks the professor which model they want, and this is one of three options.
Whether to use a formal review workflow is genuinely an open question for clinic adoption. It depends on student experience level, caseload, and how the professor already runs supervision. The professor decides at setup and can change it later.
部分诊所需要一个正式的审核关卡：学生起草文件，教授审核，然后发布产出。其他诊所认为这种模式过于刻板——他们通过案件讨论会和一对一沟通进行监管，而非队列。
**仅当
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
→ 监管模式设置为“正式审核队列”时，该功能才会激活。**否则处于休眠状态——初始设置时会询问教授想要采用哪种模式，这是三个选项之一。
是否采用正式审核工作流程是诊所实施时的一个开放性问题。这取决于学生的经验水平、案件量以及教授现有的监管方式。教授可在设置时决定，之后也可更改。

Load context

加载上下文

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
→ supervision style. If NOT "formal review queue": respond with "The clinic is set up for [flags/lighter-touch] supervision — there's no formal queue. [Professor] reviews through [the clinic's existing structure]. To switch to a formal queue, edit CLAUDE.md → Supervision style."
If formal queue IS enabled → read flag triggers and proceed.
查看
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md
→ 监管模式。若未选择“正式审核队列”：回复“诊所当前采用[标记/轻量监管]模式——无正式审核队列。[教授]通过[诊所现有架构]进行审核。如需切换至正式队列，请编辑CLAUDE.md → 监管模式。”
若已启用正式队列：读取标记触发条件并继续操作。

The queue

队列存储

Lives at 
references/review-queue.yaml
. Each entry:
yaml
- id: Q-001
  type: "draft"  # intake | draft | memo | status | client-letter
  client: "[name or ID]"
  student: "[name]"
  submitted: [timestamp]
  flags:
    - rule: "Court filing"
      detail: "Eviction answer — always queued"
  content_path: "[path to the document]"
  status: "pending"  # pending | approved | edited-approved | returned
队列存储在
references/review-queue.yaml
中。每个条目格式如下：
yaml
- id: Q-001
  type: "draft"  # intake | draft | memo | status | client-letter
  client: "[name or ID]"
  student: "[name]"
  submitted: [timestamp]
  flags:
    - rule: "Court filing"
      detail: "Eviction answer — always queued"
  content_path: "[path to the document]"
  status: "pending"  # pending | approved | edited-approved | returned

Modes

模式

What's waiting

查看待审核项

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Review Queue — [date]

审核队列 — [日期]

Pending: [N] | Oldest: [N] hours
待处理： [数量] | 最早提交： [N]小时

🔴 Deadline-sensitive

🔴 截止日期敏感项

IDTypeClientStudentWhy flaggedWaiting
ID类型客户学生标记原因等待时长

Standard

标准项

[same table]
[同上述表格]

By student

按学生分类

[Breakdown — spot patterns: who's queueing a lot, who might need a check-in]
undefined
[分类统计——发现规律：谁提交的待审核项较多，谁可能需要跟进沟通]
undefined

Review an item

审核单个项目

Show full content + why it was flagged + student notes.
展示完整内容+标记原因+学生备注。

Approve / edit-then-approve / return

批准/编辑后批准/退回

  • Approve: Status → approved, student notified, logged.
  • Edit then approve: Professor edits inline, approved version is the edited one, original preserved in log so student sees the diff (teaching moment).
  • Return: With a note. Student revises and resubmits.
  • 批准： 状态改为approved，通知学生，并记录操作。
  • 编辑后批准： 教授在线编辑，批准版本为编辑后的版本，原始版本保留在日志中，以便学生查看差异（教学环节）。
  • 退回： 附说明。学生修改后重新提交。

Logging

日志记录

Every action logged. Approval logs are clinic records — they document that a licensed attorney, solicitor, barrister, or other authorised legal professional in the clinic's jurisdiction reviewed student work before it went to a client or court. That matters for the clinic's own compliance and for student evaluation.
所有操作均会记录。批准日志属于诊所记录——它们证明在提交给客户或法院前，诊所所在辖区内的持牌律师、事务律师、大律师或其他授权法律专业人士已审核学生的工作。这对诊所的合规性和学生评估至关重要。

Teaching signal

教学信号

The queue is also data. Pattern in returns ("Student X keeps missing the service requirement") is a coaching conversation. Pattern in edits ("Everyone's demand letters are too long") is a 
/ramp
update for next semester.
队列也是一种数据。退回的规律（“学生X总是忽略送达要求”）可作为辅导谈话的依据。编辑的规律（“所有人的催告信都太长”）可作为下学期
/ramp
更新的参考。

What this skill does NOT do

该功能不支持的操作

  • Run unless the professor chose it. It's one of three supervision models, not the only one.
  • Auto-approve. The professor approves.
  • Replace the clinic's existing supervision structure. It's a gate for work product, not a substitute for case rounds, one-on-ones, or watching students in action.
  • 非教授选择则不运行： 这是三种监管模式之一，并非唯一选项。
  • 自动批准： 必须由教授批准。
  • 替代诊所现有监管架构： 这是工作产出的审核关卡，不能替代案件讨论会、一对一沟通或现场指导学生。