metrics-review
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseMetrics Review
产品指标复盘
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.
若你看到不熟悉的占位符或需要查看已连接的工具,请参阅 CONNECTORS.md。
审查并分析产品指标,识别趋势,提炼可执行的洞察。
Usage
使用方法
/metrics-review $ARGUMENTS/metrics-review $ARGUMENTSWorkflow
工作流程
1. Gather Metrics Data
1. 收集指标数据
If ~~product analytics is connected:
- Pull key product metrics for the relevant time period
- Get comparison data (previous period, same period last year, targets)
- Pull segment breakdowns if available
If no analytics tool is connected, ask the user to provide:
- The metrics and their values (paste a table, screenshot, or describe)
- Comparison data (previous period, targets)
- Any context on recent changes (launches, incidents, seasonality)
Ask the user:
- What time period to review? (last week, last month, last quarter)
- What metrics to focus on? Or should we review the full product metrics suite?
- Are there specific targets or goals to compare against?
- Any known events that might explain changes (launches, outages, marketing campaigns, seasonality)?
若已连接 ~~产品分析工具:
- 拉取相关时间段内的核心产品指标
- 获取对比数据(上期、去年同期、目标值)
- 若有可用数据,拉取细分维度的拆解数据
若未连接任何分析工具,请向用户索要以下信息:
- 指标及其数值(粘贴表格、截图或描述)
- 对比数据(上期、目标值)
- 近期变更的相关背景(新功能上线、故障、季节性因素)
向用户询问:
- 要复盘的时间段?(上周、上月、上季度)
- 重点关注哪些指标?还是需要复盘完整的产品指标体系?
- 是否有需要对比的特定目标或指标?
- 是否存在可能影响指标变化的已知事件(新功能上线、故障、营销活动、季节性因素)?
2. Organize the Metrics
2. 整理指标
Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See Product Metrics Hierarchy below for full definitions.
If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.
使用指标层级结构来组织复盘内容:顶部为北极星指标,L1健康指标(获客、激活、留存、营收、满意度),L2诊断指标用于深度拆解。完整定义请参阅下方的 产品指标层级。
若用户尚未定义指标层级,请先帮助他们确定北极星指标和核心L1指标,再继续后续步骤。
3. Analyze Trends
3. 趋势分析
For each key metric:
- Current value: What is the metric today?
- Trend: Up, down, or flat compared to previous period? Over what timeframe?
- vs Target: How does it compare to the goal or target?
- Rate of change: Is the trend accelerating or decelerating?
- Anomalies: Any sudden changes, spikes, or drops?
Identify correlations:
- Do changes in one metric correlate with changes in another?
- Are there leading indicators that predict lagging metric changes?
- Do segment breakdowns reveal that an aggregate trend is driven by a specific cohort?
针对每个核心指标:
- 当前值:该指标当前的数值是多少?
- 趋势:与上期相比是上升、下降还是持平?持续了多长时间?
- 对比目标:与目标值相比表现如何?
- 变化速率:趋势是在加速还是减速?
- 异常值:是否存在突然的变化、飙升或下降?
识别相关性:
- 一个指标的变化是否与另一个指标的变化相关?
- 是否存在能够预测滞后指标变化的先行指标?
- 细分维度拆解是否显示整体趋势是由特定用户群体驱动的?
4. Generate the Review
4. 生成复盘报告
Summary
摘要
2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
2-3句话:概述整体产品健康状况、最值得关注的变化以及核心要点。
Metric Scorecard
指标计分卡
Table format for quick scanning:
| Metric | Current | Previous | Change | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | [Target] | [On track / At risk / Miss] |
采用表格格式以便快速浏览:
| 指标 | 当前值 | 上期值 | 变化率 | 目标值 | 状态 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [指标名称] | [数值] | [数值] | [+/- %] | [目标值] | [正常 / 需关注 / 未达标] |
Trend Analysis
趋势分析
For each metric worth discussing:
- What happened and how significant is the change
- Why it likely happened (attribution based on known events, correlated metrics, segment analysis)
- Whether this is a one-time event or a sustained trend
针对每个需要讨论的指标:
- 发生了什么变化,变化的显著性如何
- 可能的原因(基于已知事件、相关指标、细分分析的归因)
- 这是一次性事件还是持续趋势
Bright Spots
亮点
What is going well:
- Metrics beating targets
- Positive trends to sustain
- Segments or features showing strong performance
表现良好的方面:
- 达标或超额完成目标的指标
- 需要维持的积极趋势
- 表现强劲的细分群体或功能
Areas of Concern
需关注领域
What needs attention:
- Metrics missing targets or trending negatively
- Early warning signals before they become problems
- Metrics where we lack visibility or understanding
需要重视的问题:
- 未达标或呈负向趋势的指标
- 问题恶化前的早期预警信号
- 缺乏可见性或理解不足的指标
Recommended Actions
建议行动
Specific next steps based on the analysis:
- Investigations to run (dig deeper into a concerning trend)
- Experiments to launch (test hypotheses about what could improve a metric)
- Investments to make (double down on what is working)
- Alerts to set (monitor a metric more closely)
基于分析得出的具体后续步骤:
- 需要开展的调查(深入挖掘令人担忧的趋势)
- 需要启动的实验(测试可改善指标的假设)
- 需要投入的资源(加大对有效策略的投入)
- 需要设置的告警(更密切地监控某一指标)
Context and Caveats
背景与说明
- Known data quality issues
- Events that affect comparability (outages, holidays, launches)
- Metrics we should be tracking but are not yet
- 已知的数据质量问题
- 影响可比性的事件(故障、节假日、新功能上线)
- 我们应该追踪但尚未追踪的指标
5. Follow Up
5. 跟进
After generating the review:
- Ask if any metric needs deeper investigation
- Offer to create a dashboard spec for ongoing monitoring
- Offer to draft experiment proposals for areas of concern
- Offer to set up a metrics review template for recurring use
生成复盘报告后:
- 询问是否需要对某一指标进行更深入的调查
- 提供创建仪表盘规格以进行持续监控的服务
- 提供为需关注领域起草实验方案的服务
- 提供设置定期指标复盘模板的服务
Product Metrics Hierarchy
产品指标层级
North Star Metric
北极星指标
The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:
- Value-aligned: Moves when users get more value from the product
- Leading: Predicts long-term business success (revenue, retention)
- Actionable: The product team can influence it through their work
- Understandable: Everyone in the company can understand what it means and why it matters
Examples by product type:
- Collaboration tool: Weekly active teams with 3+ members contributing
- Marketplace: Weekly transactions completed
- SaaS platform: Weekly active users completing core workflow
- Content platform: Weekly engaged reading/viewing time
- Developer tool: Weekly deployments using the tool
最能体现产品为用户提供核心价值的单一指标。它应具备以下特点:
- 价值对齐:当用户从产品中获得更多价值时,该指标会随之变化
- 先行性:能够预测长期业务成功(营收、留存)
- 可执行:产品团队可以通过工作影响该指标
- 易懂性:公司内所有人都能理解它的含义和重要性
按产品类型划分的示例:
- 协作工具:每周活跃且有3名以上成员贡献的团队数
- 交易平台:每周完成的交易数
- SaaS平台:完成核心工作流的周活跃用户数
- 内容平台:每周参与的阅读/观看时长
- 开发者工具:使用该工具的每周部署次数
L1 Metrics (Health Indicators)
L1指标(健康指标)
The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:
Acquisition: Are new users finding the product?
- New signups or trial starts (volume and trend)
- Signup conversion rate (visitors to signups)
- Channel mix (where are new users coming from)
- Cost per acquisition (for paid channels)
Activation: Are new users reaching the value moment?
- Activation rate: % of new users who complete the key action that predicts retention
- Time to activate: how long from signup to activation
- Setup completion rate: % who complete onboarding steps
- First value moment: when users first experience the core product value
Engagement: Are active users getting value?
- DAU / WAU / MAU: active users at different timeframes
- DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): what fraction of monthly users come back daily
- Core action frequency: how often users do the thing that matters most
- Session depth: how much users do per session
- Feature adoption: % of users using key features
Retention: Are users coming back?
- D1, D7, D30 retention: % of users who return after 1 day, 7 days, 30 days
- Cohort retention curves: how retention evolves for each signup cohort
- Churn rate: % of users or revenue lost per period
- Resurrection rate: % of churned users who come back
Monetization: Is value translating to revenue?
- Conversion rate: free to paid (for freemium)
- MRR / ARR: monthly or annual recurring revenue
- ARPU / ARPA: average revenue per user or account
- Expansion revenue: revenue growth from existing customers
- Net revenue retention: revenue retention including expansion and contraction
Satisfaction: How do users feel about the product?
- NPS: Net Promoter Score
- CSAT: Customer Satisfaction Score
- Support ticket volume and resolution time
- App store ratings and review sentiment
5-7个指标共同构成完整的产品健康状况视图。这些指标对应用户生命周期的关键阶段:
获客:新用户是否能发现产品?
- 新注册数或试用启动数(数量与趋势)
- 注册转化率(访客到注册用户)
- 渠道构成(新用户来自哪些渠道)
- 获客成本(付费渠道)
激活:新用户是否触及价值时刻?
- 激活率:完成可预测留存的关键操作的新用户占比
- 激活时长:从注册到完成激活操作的时间
- 完成设置率:完成入职步骤的用户占比
- 首次价值时刻:用户首次体验产品核心价值的时刻
留存:用户是否会回来?
- D1、D7、D30留存率:在X时间段注册的用户中,Y时间段仍活跃的用户占比
- 同期群留存曲线:每个注册用户群体的留存率变化情况
- 流失率:每个时间段流失的用户或营收占比
- 复活率:流失后又回归的用户占比
营收:价值是否转化为营收?
- 转化率:免费用户到付费用户(免费增值模式)
- MRR/ARR:月度/年度经常性营收
- ARPU/ARPA:每用户/每账户平均营收
- 扩展营收:现有客户带来的营收增长
- 净营收留存率:包含扩展和收缩的营收留存率
满意度:用户对产品的感受如何?
- NPS:净推荐值
- CSAT:客户满意度得分
- 支持工单数量与解决时长
- 应用商店评分与评论情感倾向
L2 Metrics (Diagnostic)
L2指标(诊断指标)
Detailed metrics used to investigate changes in L1 metrics:
- Funnel conversion at each step
- Feature-level usage and adoption
- Segment-specific breakdowns (by plan, company size, geography, user role)
- Performance metrics (page load time, error rate, API latency)
- Content-specific engagement (which features, pages, or content types drive engagement)
用于调查L1指标变化的详细指标:
- 每个步骤的漏斗转化率
- 功能级别的使用与采用情况
- 特定细分维度的拆解(按套餐、公司规模、地域、用户角色)
- 性能指标(页面加载时间、错误率、API延迟)
- 特定内容的参与度(哪些功能、页面或内容类型驱动了参与度)
Common Product Metrics
常见产品指标
DAU / WAU / MAU
DAU / WAU / MAU
What they measure: Unique users who perform a qualifying action in a day, week, or month.
Key decisions:
- What counts as "active"? A login? A page view? A core action? Define this carefully — different definitions tell different stories.
- Which timeframe matters most? DAU for daily-use products (messaging, email). WAU for weekly-use products (project management). MAU for less frequent products (tax software, travel booking).
How to use them:
- DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): values above 0.5 indicate a daily habit. Below 0.2 suggests infrequent usage.
- Trend matters more than absolute number. Is active usage growing, flat, or declining?
- Segment by user type. Power users and casual users behave very differently.
衡量内容:在一天、一周或一个月内执行了合格操作的独立用户数。
关键决策:
- 什么算作“活跃”?登录?页面浏览?核心操作?需仔细定义——不同的定义会呈现不同的情况。
- 哪个时间段最重要?日常使用产品(消息、邮件)关注DAU;每周使用产品(项目管理)关注WAU;使用频率较低的产品(税务软件、旅游预订)关注MAU。
使用方法:
- DAU/MAU比率(粘性):数值高于0.5表示用户已形成日常使用习惯;低于0.2表示使用频率较低。
- 趋势比绝对数值更重要。活跃用户数是在增长、持平还是下降?
- 按用户类型细分。核心用户与普通用户的行为差异很大。
Retention
留存率
What it measures: Of users who started in period X, what % are still active in period Y?
Common retention timeframes:
- D1 (next day): Was the first experience good enough to come back?
- D7 (one week): Did the user establish a habit?
- D30 (one month): Is the user retained long-term?
- D90 (three months): Is this a durable user?
How to use retention:
- Plot retention curves by cohort. Look for: initial drop-off (activation problem), steady decline (engagement problem), or flattening (good — you have a stable retained base).
- Compare cohorts over time. Are newer cohorts retaining better than older ones? That means product improvements are working.
- Segment retention by activation behavior. Users who completed onboarding vs those who did not. Users who used feature X vs those who did not.
衡量内容:在X时间段注册的用户中,Y时间段仍活跃的用户占比。
常见留存时间段:
- D1(次日):首次体验是否足够好,让用户愿意回来?
- D7(一周后):用户是否形成了使用习惯?
- D30(一个月后):用户是否长期留存?
- D90(三个月后):用户是否成为稳定用户?
使用方法:
- 按同期群绘制留存曲线。关注:初始流失(激活问题)、持续下降(参与度问题)、趋于平稳(良好——拥有稳定的留存用户群)。
- 对比不同时期的同期群。新用户群体的留存率是否比老用户群体更好?这意味着产品改进有效。
- 按激活行为细分留存率。完成入职的用户与未完成的用户;使用过功能X的用户与未使用的用户。
Conversion
转化率
What it measures: % of users who move from one stage to the next.
Common conversion funnels:
- Visitor to signup
- Signup to activation (key value moment)
- Free to paid (trial conversion)
- Trial to paid subscription
- Monthly to annual plan
How to use conversion:
- Map the full funnel and measure conversion at each step
- Identify the biggest drop-off points — these are your highest-leverage improvement opportunities
- Segment conversion by source, plan, user type. Different segments convert very differently.
- Track conversion over time. Is it improving as you iterate on the experience?
衡量内容:从一个阶段进入下一个阶段的用户占比。
常见转化漏斗:
- 访客到注册用户
- 注册用户到激活用户(关键价值时刻)
- 免费用户到付费用户(试用转化)
- 试用用户到付费订阅用户
- 月度套餐到年度套餐
使用方法:
- 绘制完整的漏斗并衡量每个步骤的转化率
- 找出最大的流失点——这些是提升空间最大的环节
- 按来源、套餐、用户类型细分转化率。不同细分群体的转化率差异很大。
- 追踪转化率随时间的变化。迭代用户体验后,转化率是否有所提升?
Activation
激活率
What it measures: % of new users who reach the moment where they first experience the product's core value.
Defining activation:
- Look at retained users vs churned users. What actions did retained users take that churned users did not?
- The activation event should be strongly predictive of long-term retention
- It should be achievable within the first session or first few days
- Examples: created first project, invited a teammate, completed first workflow, connected an integration
How to use activation:
- Track activation rate for every signup cohort
- Measure time to activate — faster is almost always better
- Build onboarding flows that guide users to the activation moment
- A/B test activation flows and measure impact on retention, not just activation rate
衡量内容:触及产品核心价值时刻的新用户占比。
定义激活事件:
- 对比留存用户与流失用户的行为。留存用户做了哪些流失用户没做的操作?
- 激活事件应能强烈预测长期留存
- 应能在首次会话或最初几天内完成
- 示例:创建第一个项目、邀请同事、完成第一个工作流、连接集成
使用方法:
- 追踪每个注册用户群体的激活率
- 衡量激活时长——越快越好
- 构建引导用户到达激活时刻的入职流程
- 对激活流程进行A/B测试,并衡量其对留存率的影响,而不仅仅是激活率
Goal Setting Frameworks
目标设定框架
OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)
OKRs(目标与关键成果)
Objectives: Qualitative, aspirational goals that describe what you want to achieve.
- Inspiring and memorable
- Time-bound (quarterly or annually)
- Directional, not metric-specific
Key Results: Quantitative measures that tell you if you achieved the objective.
- Specific and measurable
- Time-bound with a clear target
- Outcome-based, not output-based
- 2-4 Key Results per Objective
Example:
Objective: Make our product indispensable for daily workflows
Key Results:
- Increase DAU/MAU ratio from 0.35 to 0.50
- Increase D30 retention for new users from 40% to 55%
- 3 core workflows with >80% task completion rate目标:定性、有抱负的目标,描述你想要实现的内容。
- 鼓舞人心且令人难忘
- 有时间限制(季度或年度)
- 方向性,而非具体指标
关键成果:量化指标,用于判断是否实现了目标。
- 具体且可衡量
- 有明确目标和时间限制
- 基于结果,而非产出
- 每个目标对应2-4个关键成果
示例:
目标:让我们的产品成为日常工作流中不可或缺的工具
关键成果:
- 将DAU/MAU比率从0.35提升至0.50
- 将新用户的D30留存率从40%提升至55%
- 3个核心工作流的任务完成率>80%OKR Best Practices
OKR最佳实践
- Set OKRs that are ambitious but achievable. 70% completion is the target for stretch OKRs.
- Key Results should measure outcomes (user behavior, business results), not outputs (features shipped, tasks completed).
- Do not have too many OKRs. 2-3 objectives with 2-4 KRs each is plenty.
- OKRs should be uncomfortable. If you are confident you will hit all of them, they are not ambitious enough.
- Review OKRs at mid-period. Adjust effort allocation if some KRs are clearly off track.
- Grade OKRs honestly at end of period. 0.0-0.3 = missed, 0.4-0.6 = progress, 0.7-1.0 = achieved.
- 设定有挑战性但可实现的OKRs。挑战性OKRs的目标完成率为70%。
- 关键成果应衡量结果(用户行为、业务成果),而非产出(发布的功能、完成的任务)。
- OKRs数量不宜过多。2-3个目标,每个目标对应2-4个关键成果即可。
- OKRs应让人感到有压力。如果你确信能完成所有目标,说明目标不够有挑战性。
- 中期回顾OKRs。如果某些关键成果明显偏离轨道,调整资源分配。
- 季度末诚实地为OKRs评分。0.0-0.3=未达标,0.4-0.6=有进展,0.7-1.0=已完成。
Setting Metric Targets
指标目标设定
- Baseline: What is the current value? You need a reliable baseline before setting a target.
- Benchmark: What do comparable products achieve? Industry benchmarks provide context.
- Trajectory: What is the current trend? If the metric is already improving at 5% per month, a 6% target is not ambitious.
- Effort: How much investment are you putting behind this? Bigger bets warrant more ambitious targets.
- Confidence: How confident are you in hitting the target? Set a "commit" (high confidence) and a "stretch" (ambitious).
- 基线:当前数值是多少?设定目标前需要可靠的基线。
- 基准:同类产品的表现如何?行业基准提供参考背景。
- 趋势:当前趋势是什么?如果指标每月已提升5%,那么6%的目标不够有挑战性。
- 投入:你在这方面投入了多少资源?更大的投入对应更有野心的目标。
- 信心:你对实现目标有多大信心?设定一个“承诺”(高信心)和一个“挑战”(有野心)目标。
Metric Review Cadences
指标复盘节奏
Weekly Metrics Check
每周指标检查
Purpose: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health.
Duration: 15-30 minutes.
Attendees: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.
What to review:
- North Star metric: current value, week-over-week change
- Key L1 metrics: any notable movements
- Active experiments: results and statistical significance
- Anomalies: any unexpected spikes or drops
- Alerts: anything that triggered a monitoring alert
Action: If something looks off, investigate. Otherwise, note it and move on.
目的:快速发现问题、监控实验、掌握产品健康状况。
时长:15-30分钟。
参会者:产品经理,可能包括工程负责人。
复盘内容:
- 北极星指标:当前值、周环比变化
- 核心L1指标:任何值得关注的变动
- 进行中的实验:结果与统计显著性
- 异常值:任何意外的飙升或下降
- 告警:触发监控告警的事件
行动:若发现异常,进行调查;否则记录并继续。
Monthly Metrics Review
每月指标复盘
Purpose: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications.
Duration: 30-60 minutes.
Attendees: Product team, key stakeholders.
What to review:
- Full L1 metric scorecard with month-over-month trends
- Progress against quarterly OKR targets
- Cohort analysis: are newer cohorts performing better?
- Feature adoption: how are recent launches performing?
- Segment analysis: any divergence between user segments?
Action: Identify 1-3 areas to investigate or invest in. Update priorities if metrics reveal new information.
目的:深入分析趋势、对比目标进展、探讨战略影响。
时长:30-60分钟。
参会者:产品团队、关键利益相关者。
复盘内容:
- 完整的L1指标计分卡,包含月环比趋势
- 季度OKR目标的进展情况
- 同期群分析:新用户群体的表现是否更好?
- 功能采用情况:近期上线功能的表现如何?
- 细分分析:不同用户群体之间是否存在差异?
行动:确定1-3个需要调查或投入的领域。若指标揭示新信息,更新优先级。
Quarterly Business Review
季度业务复盘
Purpose: Strategic assessment of product performance, goal-setting for next quarter.
Duration: 60-90 minutes.
Attendees: Product, engineering, design, leadership.
What to review:
- OKR scoring for the quarter
- Trend analysis for all L1 metrics over the quarter
- Year-over-year comparisons
- Competitive context: market changes and competitor movements
- What worked and what did not
Action: Set OKRs for next quarter. Adjust product strategy based on what the data shows.
目的:战略性评估产品表现,为下一季度设定目标。
时长:60-90分钟。
参会者:产品、工程、设计、管理层。
复盘内容:
- 本季度OKRs评分
- 所有L1指标的季度趋势分析
- 同比对比
- 竞争环境:市场变化与竞争对手动态
- 成功与失败的经验总结
行动:设定下一季度的OKRs。根据数据调整产品策略。
Dashboard Design Principles
仪表盘设计原则
Effective Product Dashboards
高效的产品仪表盘
A good dashboard answers the question "How is the product doing?" at a glance.
Principles:
-
Start with the question, not the data. What decisions does this dashboard support? Design backwards from the decision.
-
Hierarchy of information. The most important metric should be the most visually prominent. North Star at the top, L1 metrics next, L2 metrics available on drill-down.
-
Context over numbers. A number without context is meaningless. Always show: current value, comparison (previous period, target, benchmark), trend direction.
-
Fewer metrics, more insight. A dashboard with 50 metrics helps no one. Focus on 5-10 that matter. Put everything else in a detailed report.
-
Consistent time periods. Use the same time period for all metrics on a dashboard. Mixing daily and monthly metrics creates confusion.
-
Visual status indicators. Use color to indicate health at a glance:
- Green: on track or improving
- Yellow: needs attention or flat
- Red: off track or declining
-
Actionability. Every metric on the dashboard should be something the team can influence. If you cannot act on it, it does not belong on the product dashboard.
优秀的仪表盘能一眼回答“产品表现如何?”的问题。
原则:
-
从问题出发,而非数据:这个仪表盘支持哪些决策?从决策倒推设计。
-
信息层级:最重要的指标应最显眼。顶部是北极星指标,接下来是L1指标,L2指标可通过钻取查看。
-
上下文优先于数字:脱离上下文的数字毫无意义。始终显示:当前值、对比数据(上期、目标、基准)、趋势方向。
-
少而精:包含50个指标的仪表盘毫无用处。聚焦5-10个关键指标。其他指标放入详细报告。
-
时间周期一致:仪表盘上所有指标使用相同的时间周期。混合日度和月度指标会造成混淆。
-
可视化状态指示:用颜色直观表示健康状况:
- 绿色:正常或改善
- 黄色:需关注或持平
- 红色:偏离轨道或下降
-
可执行性:仪表盘上的每个指标都应是团队可以影响的。如果无法采取行动,就不该出现在产品仪表盘上。
Dashboard Layout
仪表盘布局
Top row: North Star metric with trend line and target.
Second row: L1 metrics scorecard — current value, change, target, status for each key metric.
Third row: Key funnels or conversion metrics — visual funnel showing drop-off at each stage.
Fourth row: Recent experiments and launches — active A/B tests, recent feature launches with early metrics.
Bottom / drill-down: L2 metrics, segment breakdowns, and detailed time series for investigation.
第一行:北极星指标,附带趋势线和目标值。
第二行:L1指标计分卡——每个核心指标的当前值、变化率、目标值、状态。
第三行:关键漏斗或转化指标——可视化漏斗,显示每个步骤的流失情况。
第四行:近期实验与上线功能——进行中的A/B测试、近期上线功能的早期指标。
底部/钻取区域:L2指标、细分维度拆解、用于调查的详细时间序列。
Dashboard Anti-Patterns
仪表盘反模式
- Vanity metrics: Metrics that always go up but do not indicate health (total signups ever, total page views)
- Too many metrics: Dashboards that require scrolling to see. If it does not fit on one screen, cut metrics.
- No comparison: Raw numbers without context (current value with no previous period or target)
- Stale dashboards: Metrics that have not been updated or reviewed in months
- Output dashboards: Measuring team activity (tickets closed, PRs merged) instead of user and business outcomes
- One dashboard for all audiences: Executives, PMs, and engineers need different views. One size does not fit all.
- 虚荣指标:总是上升但不反映健康状况的指标(累计注册数、累计页面浏览量)
- 指标过多:需要滚动查看的仪表盘。如果无法在一屏显示,就删减指标。
- 无对比:无上下文的原始数字(仅显示当前值,无上期或目标值)
- 过时仪表盘:数月未更新或未复盘的指标
- 产出仪表盘:衡量团队活动(关闭的工单、合并的PR)而非用户和业务成果
- 通用仪表盘:高管、产品经理和工程师需要不同的视图。通用模板并不适用。
Alerting
告警设置
Set alerts for metrics that require immediate attention:
- Threshold alerts: Metric drops below or rises above a critical threshold (error rate > 1%, conversion < 5%)
- Trend alerts: Metric shows sustained decline over multiple days/weeks
- Anomaly alerts: Metric deviates significantly from expected range
Alert hygiene:
- Every alert should be actionable. If you cannot do anything about it, do not alert on it.
- Review and tune alerts regularly. Too many false positives and people ignore all alerts.
- Define an owner for each alert. Who responds when it fires?
- Set appropriate severity levels. Not everything is P0.
为需要立即关注的指标设置告警:
- 阈值告警:指标低于或高于临界阈值(错误率>1%,转化率<5%)
- 趋势告警:指标连续多日/周呈下降趋势
- 异常告警:指标显著偏离预期范围
告警规范:
- 每个告警都应是可执行的。如果无法采取行动,就不要设置告警。
- 定期回顾和调整告警。误报过多会导致用户忽略所有告警。
- 为每个告警定义负责人。告警触发时谁来响应?
- 设置适当的严重级别。并非所有告警都是最高优先级。
Output Format
输出格式
Use tables for the scorecard. Use clear status indicators. Keep the summary tight — the reader should get the essential story in 30 seconds.
计分卡使用表格。使用清晰的状态指示。摘要要简洁——读者应能在30秒内了解核心信息。
Tips
提示
- Start with the "so what" — what is the most important thing in this metrics review? Lead with that.
- Absolute numbers without context are useless. Always show comparisons (vs previous period, vs target, vs benchmark).
- Be careful about attribution. Correlation is not causation. If a metric moved, acknowledge uncertainty about why.
- Segment analysis often reveals that an aggregate metric masks important differences. A flat overall number might hide one segment growing and another shrinking.
- Not all metric movements matter. Small fluctuations are noise. Focus attention on meaningful changes.
- If a metric is missing its target, do not just report the miss — recommend what to do about it.
- Metrics reviews should drive decisions. If the review does not lead to at least one action, it was not useful.
- 从“重要性”入手——本次指标复盘最重要的内容是什么?开门见山。
- 脱离上下文的绝对数字毫无用处。始终显示对比数据(与上期、目标、基准对比)。
- 归因要谨慎。相关性不等于因果关系。如果指标发生变化,要承认原因的不确定性。
- 细分分析常能发现整体指标掩盖的重要差异。整体数值持平可能隐藏着一个细分群体增长、另一个下降的情况。
- 并非所有指标变化都重要。小幅波动是噪音。关注有意义的变化。
- 如果指标未达标,不要只报告未达标——还要建议解决方案。
- 指标复盘应推动决策。如果复盘未产生至少一个行动,那就是无用的。