Back to Details

vendor-review

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

/vendor-review

/vendor-review

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Evaluate a vendor with structured analysis covering cost, risk, performance, and fit.
若遇到不熟悉的占位符或需要查看已连接的工具，请参阅CONNECTORS.md。
通过涵盖成本、风险、性能及适配性的结构化分析来评估供应商。

Usage

使用方法

/vendor-review $ARGUMENTS
/vendor-review $ARGUMENTS

What I Need From You

我需要您提供的信息

  • Vendor name: Who are you evaluating?
  • Context: New vendor evaluation, renewal decision, or comparison?
  • Details: Contract terms, pricing, proposal document, or current performance data
  • 供应商名称：您要评估的对象是谁？
  • 场景：新供应商评估、续约决策，还是供应商对比？
  • 详细信息：合同条款、定价方案、提案文档，或当前性能数据

Evaluation Framework

评估框架

Cost Analysis (Total Cost of Ownership)

成本分析（总拥有成本）

  • Total cost of ownership (not just license fees)
  • Implementation and migration costs
  • Training and onboarding costs
  • Ongoing support and maintenance
  • Exit costs (data migration, contract termination)
  • 总拥有成本（不仅限于许可费用）
  • 实施与迁移成本
  • 培训与入职成本
  • 持续支持与维护成本
  • 退出成本（数据迁移、合同终止）

Risk Assessment

风险评估

  • Vendor financial stability
  • Security and compliance posture
  • Concentration risk (single vendor dependency)
  • Contract lock-in and exit terms
  • Business continuity and disaster recovery
  • 供应商财务稳定性
  • 安全与合规状况
  • 集中风险（单一供应商依赖）
  • 合同锁定与退出条款
  • 业务连续性与灾难恢复

Performance Metrics

性能指标

  • SLA compliance
  • Support response times
  • Uptime and reliability
  • Feature delivery cadence
  • Customer satisfaction
  • SLA合规性
  • 支持响应时间
  • 可用性与可靠性
  • 功能交付节奏
  • 客户满意度

Comparison Matrix

对比矩阵

When comparing vendors, produce a side-by-side matrix covering: pricing, features, integrations, security, support, contract terms, and references.
对比供应商时，生成涵盖以下内容的并排矩阵：定价、功能、集成能力、安全性、支持服务、合同条款及参考案例。

Output

输出格式

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Vendor Review: [Vendor Name]

供应商评估：[供应商名称]

Date: [Date] | Type: [New / Renewal / Comparison]
日期： [日期] | 类型： [新评估 / 续约 / 对比]

Summary

摘要

[2-3 sentence recommendation]
[2-3句话的建议]

Cost Analysis

成本分析

ComponentAnnual CostNotes
License/subscription$[X][Per seat, flat, usage-based]
Implementation$[X][One-time]
Support/maintenance$[X][Included or add-on]
Total Year 1$[X]
Total 3-Year$[X]
组件年度成本备注
许可/订阅$[X][按席位、固定费用、基于使用量]
实施$[X][一次性费用]
支持/维护$[X][包含在内或需额外购买]
第一年总成本$[X]
三年总成本$[X]

Risk Assessment

风险评估

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation
[Risk]High/Med/LowHigh/Med/Low[Mitigation]
风险可能性影响缓解措施
[风险项]高/中/低高/中/低[缓解措施]

Strengths

优势

  • [Strength 1]
  • [Strength 2]
  • [优势1]
  • [优势2]

Concerns

关注点

  • [Concern 1]
  • [Concern 2]
  • [关注点1]
  • [关注点2]

Recommendation

建议

[Proceed / Negotiate / Pass] — [Reasoning]
[推进 / 谈判 / 放弃] — [理由]

Negotiation Points

谈判要点

  • [Leverage point 1]
  • [Leverage point 2]
undefined
  • [谈判筹码1]
  • [谈判筹码2]
undefined

If Connectors Available

若已连接连接器

If ~~knowledge base is connected:
  • Search for existing vendor evaluations, contracts, and performance reviews
  • Pull procurement policies and approval thresholds
If ~~procurement is connected:
  • Pull current contract terms, spend history, and renewal dates
  • Compare pricing against existing vendor agreements
若已连接~~知识库：
  • 搜索现有的供应商评估、合同及绩效审查记录
  • 获取采购政策及审批阈值
若已连接~~采购系统：
  • 获取当前合同条款、支出历史及续约日期
  • 对比现有供应商协议的定价

Tips

提示

  1. Upload the proposal — I can extract pricing, terms, and SLAs from vendor documents.
  2. Compare vendors — "Compare Vendor A vs Vendor B" gets you a side-by-side analysis.
  3. Include current spend — For renewals, knowing what you pay now helps evaluate price changes.
  1. 上传提案文档——我可以从供应商文档中提取定价、条款及SLA信息。
  2. 对比供应商——发送“对比供应商A与供应商B”即可获取并排分析结果。
  3. 包含当前支出——对于续约评估，了解当前支付金额有助于评估价格变动。