grad-event-study

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Apply event study methodology to measure abnormal returns and cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) around corporate or market events. Use this skill when the user needs to quantify the market impact of announcements, design event and estimation windows, or when they ask 'did this event affect stock price', 'how do I calculate abnormal returns', or 'what is the market reaction to this announcement'.

3installs

Sourceasgard-ai-platform/skills

Added on2026-04-15

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add asgard-ai-platform/skills grad-event-study

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

事件研究法 (Event Study)

Overview

The event study method (Fama et al., 1969; MacKinlay, 1997) isolates the abnormal return attributable to a specific event by comparing actual returns against a model of expected (normal) returns. Cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) over an event window quantify the total market reaction.

When to Use

Measuring market reaction to earnings announcements, M&A, policy changes, or regulatory events
Testing semi-strong form market efficiency
Quantifying the economic significance of corporate disclosures
Comparing market reactions across different event types or firm characteristics

When NOT to Use

The event date is ambiguous or the information leaked gradually
Confounding events overlap with the event window
The firm's stock is illiquid with many zero-return days
The event was widely anticipated and fully priced before the event window

Assumptions

IRON LAW: Event study validity requires that the event was UNANTICIPATED —
if the market priced it in before the event window, abnormal returns will
be zero even if the event matters.

Key assumptions:

Event date is precisely identifiable and the event was unexpected
No confounding events occur within the event window
The normal return model is correctly specified during the estimation window
Market microstructure effects (thin trading, bid-ask bounce) do not distort returns

Methodology

Step 1 — Define Event and Windows

Identify the event date (day 0). Set estimation window (e.g., [-250, -11]) to estimate normal returns. Set event window (e.g., [-1, +1] or [-5, +5]) to capture the reaction.

Step 2 — Estimate Normal Returns

Use the market model: Ri,t = αi + βi × Rm,t + εi,t estimated over the estimation window. Alternatives include constant mean return or Fama-French factors. See

references/

for model specifications.

Step 3 — Compute Abnormal and Cumulative Abnormal Returns

AR = Actual return - Expected return for each day in the event window. CAR = sum of ARs over the event window. Compute CAAR (cumulative average abnormal return) across firms.

Step 4 — Statistical Testing

Test H₀: CAR = 0 using parametric tests (cross-sectional t-test, Patell test) and non-parametric tests (sign test, rank test). Report both for robustness.

Output Format

markdown

## Event Study: [Event Description]

### Window Design
| Window | Period | Rationale |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Estimation | [-250, -11] | [rationale] |
| Event | [-1, +1] | [rationale] |

### Abnormal Returns
| Day | AR (%) | t-stat |
|-----|--------|--------|
| -1 | x.xx | x.xx |
| 0 | x.xx | x.xx |
| +1 | x.xx | x.xx |

### Cumulative Abnormal Returns
| Window | CAR (%) | t-stat | p-value | Significant? |
|--------|---------|--------|---------|-------------|
| [-1, +1] | x.xx | x.xx | x.xx | [Yes/No] |

### Cross-Sectional Analysis
- [If applicable: regression of CAR on firm characteristics]

### Limitations
- [Note any confounding events or assumption violations]

Gotchas

Clustering of event dates (e.g., industry-wide regulation) violates cross-sectional independence
Short estimation windows produce noisy normal return parameters
Long event windows increase the probability of confounding events
Penny stocks and illiquid securities inflate abnormal returns artificially
The market model assumes constant beta — structural breaks invalidate this
Publication bias: studies finding zero CAR are rarely published

References

MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13-39.
Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review, 10(1), 1-21.
Kolari, J. W., & Pynnönen, S. (2010). Event study testing with cross-sectional correlation of abnormal returns. Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), 3996-4025.