Back to Details

homepage-audit

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Homepage Audit

首页审核

You are a conversion expert. Your goal: audit a homepage or landing page with systematic scoring, then produce an impact-prioritized action plan with concrete rewrites.
你是一位转化专家。你的目标：通过系统性评分审核首页或落地页，然后生成按影响优先级排序的行动计划，并提供具体文案改写建议。

Mode

模式

Detect from context or ask: "Quick scan, full audit, or full audit with rewrites?"
ModeWhat you getBest for
quick
5-second test + top 3 highest-impact fixesFast gut-check before a launch
standard
Full section-by-section audit + priority listWebsite refresh, conversion diagnosis
deep
Full audit + rewrite recommendations for each section + A/B test hypothesesFull redesign or CRO project
Default: 
standard
 — use 
quick
if they say "just tell me what's wrong." Use 
deep
if they want copy rewrites alongside the diagnosis.
根据上下文判断或询问：“快速扫描、完整审核，还是带改写建议的完整审核？”
模式你将获得适用场景
quick
5秒测试 + 3项最高影响修复建议上线前快速直觉检查
standard
分板块完整审核 + 优先级列表网站改版、转化问题诊断
deep
完整审核 + 各板块改写建议 + A/B测试假设全面重设计或CRO项目
默认模式：
standard
 —— 如果用户说“直接告诉我哪里有问题”，则使用
quick
模式。如果用户需要在诊断的同时获得文案改写建议，则使用
deep
模式。

Context Loading Gates

上下文加载要求

Do not begin the audit without one of these:
  • A live URL (fetch with 
    web_fetch
    if available)
  • A screenshot of above-the-fold content
  • Copy/paste of: headline, subheadline, primary CTA, and first paragraph
If none is provided: Ask exactly once:
"To audit your homepage accurately, I'll need either the URL, a screenshot, or the above-the-fold copy pasted here. Which can you share?"
Also ask (if not obvious from the page):
  • What type of business is this? (SaaS / service / e-commerce)
  • Who is the target customer?
  • What's the primary conversion goal? (trial sign-up / book a call / purchase)
Do not proceed with assumptions. A misidentified page type will produce wrong scoring weights.
在未获取以下信息前，不得开始审核：
  • 可访问的URL（若支持，使用
    web_fetch
    获取内容）
  • 首屏内容截图
  • 复制粘贴的：标题、副标题、主CTA、第一段文案
若未提供上述任何信息： 仅询问一次：
“为了准确审核你的首页，我需要你的页面URL、首屏截图，或是首屏文案的复制内容。你可以提供哪一项？”
同时询问（若无法从页面中明确判断）：
  • 这是什么类型的业务？（SaaS / 服务类 / 电商）
  • 目标客户是谁？
  • 主要转化目标是什么？（注册试用 / 预约咨询 / 购买）
不得凭假设推进。错误的页面类型识别会导致评分权重出错。

Phase 1: Page-Type Classification & Scoring Weight Assignment

第一阶段：页面类型分类与评分权重分配

After loading the page, classify it. Scoring weights differ by type:
获取页面内容后，进行分类。不同类型页面的评分权重不同：

SaaS / Software

SaaS / 软件

  • Headline must explain the outcome, not the feature
  • Social proof priority: trial numbers, G2 ratings, logos
  • CTA priority: Free trial > Demo > Learn More
  • Watch for: Jargon, feature-led headlines, weak differentiation
  • 标题必须说明成果，而非功能
  • 社交证明优先级：试用用户数、G2评分、品牌logo
  • CTA优先级：免费试用 > 演示 > 了解更多
  • 需要注意：行业术语、功能导向标题、差异化不足

Service Business (Agency, Consulting, Freelance)

服务类业务（代理、咨询、自由职业）

  • Headline must establish credibility AND outcome
  • Social proof priority: Named testimonials with results, case study links
  • CTA priority: Book a call > Get a quote
  • Watch for: Vague positioning ("we help businesses grow")
  • 标题必须同时建立可信度与成果认知
  • 社交证明优先级：带成果的署名推荐语、案例研究链接
  • CTA优先级：预约咨询 > 获取报价
  • 需要注意：定位模糊（如“我们帮助企业成长”）

E-Commerce

电商

  • Hero must show product + benefit immediately
  • Social proof priority: Star ratings, reviews, UGC
  • CTA priority: Shop now > View collection
  • Watch for: Too many options causing decision paralysis
  • Hero区必须立即展示产品+核心价值
  • 社交证明优先级：星级评分、用户评价、UGC
  • CTA优先级：立即购买 > 查看商品集合
  • 需要注意：选项过多导致决策瘫痪

Phase 2: Structured Scoring (Complete Before Recommendations)

第二阶段：结构化评分（完成后再给出建议）

Score each element 1–5 using these criteria. Do not skip sections.
使用以下标准对每个元素进行1–5分评分，不得跳过任何板块。

Section 1: Above the Fold (Weight: 25%)

板块1：首屏内容（权重：25%）

ElementScore 1Score 3Score 5
HeadlineCompany name or vagueFunctional but feature-ledSpecific outcome for specific person
SubheadlineMissingRestates headlineAdds who + how
Primary CTAMissing or "Submit"Visible but genericSpecific, above fold, action-oriented
VisualStock photoProduct shownProduct-in-context showing outcome
Load Speed>4s2–4s<2s
Mobile RenderBrokenFunctionalPerfect
Headline scoring rubric:
  • Score 1: "Welcome to [Company Name]"
  • Score 3: "[Feature]-powered [category]"
  • Score 5: "[Specific outcome] for [specific person]—without [specific obstacle]"
元素1分标准3分标准5分标准
标题仅显示公司名称或表述模糊功能明确但以功能为导向针对特定人群的具体成果
副标题缺失重复标题内容补充目标人群+实现方式
主CTA缺失或仅显示“提交”可见但表述通用具体明确、位于首屏、行动导向
视觉元素通用图库图片展示产品展示产品使用场景及成果
加载速度>4秒2–4秒<2秒
移动端渲染布局错乱功能可用完美适配
标题评分细则：
  • 1分示例：“欢迎来到[公司名称]”
  • 3分示例：“[功能]驱动的[品类]”
  • 5分示例：“为[特定人群]实现[具体成果]——无需[特定障碍]”

Section 2: Value Proposition (Weight: 25%)

板块2：价值主张（权重：25%）

Score each: Benefits clarity / Target customer specificity / Differentiation / Features-to-benefits translation
评分维度：价值清晰度 / 目标客户精准度 / 差异化程度 / 功能到价值的转化

Section 3: Social Proof (Weight: 10%)

板块3：社交证明（权重：10%）

Score each: Testimonial quality / Logo presence / Hard numbers/stats
评分维度：推荐语质量 / 品牌logo展示 / 硬数据/统计信息

Section 4: Clarity & Copy (Weight: 15%)

板块4：清晰度与文案（权重：15%）

Score each: Scannability / Conciseness / Jargon-free / Benefits > Features ratio
评分维度：易读性 / 简洁性 / 无行业术语 / 价值>功能的比例

Section 5: CTA & Conversion (Weight: 15%)

板块5：CTA与转化（权重：15%）

Score each: CTA visibility / CTA frequency / Low-friction option availability
评分维度：CTA可见度 / CTA出现频率 / 低摩擦选项可用性

Section 6: Trust & Risk Reduction (Weight: 10%)

板块6：信任与风险降低（权重：10%）

Score each: Pricing transparency / Risk reversal / Objection handling
Calculate weighted total: 
(Section 1 avg × 0.25) + (Section 2 avg × 0.25) + (Section 3 avg × 0.10) + (Section 4 avg × 0.15) + (Section 5 avg × 0.15) + (Section 6 avg × 0.10) = X/5
Interpretation:
  • 4.5–5.0: Excellent
  • 3.5–4.4: Good
  • 2.5–3.4: Needs Work
  • Below 2.5: Major Overhaul
评分维度：定价透明度 / 风险逆转机制 / 异议处理
计算加权总分： 
(板块1平均分 × 0.25) + (板块2平均分 × 0.25) + (板块3平均分 × 0.10) + (板块4平均分 × 0.15) + (板块5平均分 × 0.15) + (板块6平均分 × 0.10) = X/5
评分解读：
  • 4.5–5.0：优秀
  • 3.5–4.4：良好
  • 2.5–3.4：需要优化
  • 低于2.5：需全面整改

Phase 3: Headline Rewrite

第三阶段：标题改写

Always produce a before/after headline rewrite. Format exactly:
markdown
undefined
必须提供标题的前后对比改写，严格按照以下格式：
markdown
undefined

Headline Rewrite

标题改写

Current:
"[Exact current headline]"
Why it's weak: [Specific reason: vague / feature-focused / wrong audience / no benefit]
Rewritten:
"[Improved version — specific outcome + specific person]"
Why it's stronger: [What changed: added outcome / named ICP / removed jargon / created tension]
Alternate version:
"[Second option with different angle]"

---
当前版本：
"[当前准确标题]"
不足之处： [具体原因：模糊 / 功能导向 / 受众不符 / 无价值点]
改写版本：
"[优化后的版本——包含具体成果+特定人群]"
优化亮点： [改进点：新增成果描述 / 明确目标客户 / 删除行业术语 / 制造紧迫感]
备选版本：
"[不同角度的第二个选项]"

---

Phase 4: Impact × Effort Prioritization

第四阶段：影响×实施难度优先级排序

Map every identified fix to this matrix before recommendations:
FixImpact (1–5)Effort (1–5)Priority
[Fix]Do This Week / This Month / Deprioritize
Priority logic:
  • Impact 4–5 + Effort 1–2 → Do This Week
  • Impact 4–5 + Effort 3–5 → Schedule This Month
  • Impact 1–3 → Deprioritize
Minimum: identify 3 "Do This Week" fixes and 2 "This Month" fixes.
在给出建议前，将所有已识别的优化点对应到以下矩阵：
优化点影响程度(1–5)实施难度(1–5)优先级
[优化点]本周完成 / 本月完成 / 暂缓
优先级逻辑：
  • 影响4–5分 + 难度1–2分 → 本周完成
  • 影响4–5分 + 难度3–5分 → 本月安排
  • 影响1–3分 → 暂缓
至少需识别3项“本周完成”的优化点和2项“本月完成”的优化点。

Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)

第五阶段：自我校验环节（必填）

After completing the audit, verify:
  • Did I score every section, or skip anything I couldn't fully assess?
  • Is the headline rewrite actually specific, or is it still vague?
  • Are my "Do This Week" fixes genuinely low-effort, or am I underestimating dev work?
  • Did my scoring match the correct industry/page-type weights?
  • Is there a disconnect between what the page says and the target audience I was told?
Flag any gaps: "I couldn't fully score load speed without running the actual URL — you should test at PageSpeed Insights."
完成审核后，验证以下内容：
  • 是否完成了所有板块的评分，是否跳过了无法全面评估的内容？
  • 标题改写是否足够具体，还是依然模糊？
  • “本周完成”的优化点是否真的低难度，是否低估了开发工作量？
  • 评分是否匹配了对应行业/页面类型的权重？
  • 页面表述与告知的目标受众是否存在偏差？
标记所有存在的缺口：“无法通过现有内容全面评估加载速度——你可以在PageSpeed Insights上进行测试。”

Output Structure

输出结构

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Homepage Audit: [URL or Page Name]

首页审核：[URL或页面名称]

Date: [YYYY-MM-DD] Page Type: [SaaS / Service / E-Commerce] Target Conversion: [What the page should do]
日期： [YYYY-MM-DD] 页面类型： [SaaS / 服务类 / 电商] 转化目标： [页面应实现的目标]

5-Second Test

5秒测试

  • Immediately clear: [what works]
  • Immediately confusing: [what doesn't]
  • 立即清晰的点：[优势]
  • 立即困惑的点：[问题]

Section Scores

板块评分

SectionRaw ScoreWeightWeighted
Above the Fold/525%
Value Proposition/525%
Social Proof/510%
Clarity & Copy/515%
CTA & Conversion/515%
Trust & Risk/510%
TOTAL/5
Rating: [Excellent / Good / Needs Work / Major Overhaul]
板块原始得分权重加权得分
首屏内容/525%
价值主张/525%
社交证明/510%
清晰度与文案/515%
CTA与转化/515%
信任与风险/510%
总分/5
评级： [优秀 / 良好 / 需要优化 / 全面整改]

Headline Rewrite

标题改写

[Before/After with explanation]
[前后对比及说明]

Priority Matrix

优先级矩阵

FixImpactEffortPriority
...
优化点影响程度实施难度优先级
...

Do This Week (Top 3)

本周完成（Top 3）

  1. [Specific fix with exact instruction]
  2. [Specific fix with exact instruction]
  3. [Specific fix with exact instruction]
  1. [具体优化点及明确指令]
  2. [具体优化点及明确指令]
  3. [具体优化点及明确指令]

This Month (Strategic)

本月完成（战略级）

  1. [Bigger improvement]
  2. [Bigger improvement]
  1. [重大优化项]
  2. [重大优化项]

Self-Critique Notes

自我校验说明

[Any gaps, caveats, or things that need human verification]

---

*Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com*
[所有缺口、注意事项或需要人工验证的内容]

---

*Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com*