Back to Details

pinned-comment

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

LinkedIn Pinned Comment + Image Prompt Skill

LinkedIn置顶评论+图片提示词技能

Why This Skill Exists

此技能的存在意义

The post delivers value. The pinned comment builds personality, trust, and rewatch value. It is where Charlie drops the polished creator mask and talks like a real person.
Funny is subjective and easy to miss. This skill exists to make hilarious pinned comments REPEATABLE so anyone on the team (Smriti, Ansh, etc.) can produce them at Charlie's standard.
帖子传递价值，置顶评论则塑造人格、建立信任并提升重复浏览价值。在这里，Charlie会卸下精致的创作者面具，像普通人一样交流。
幽默具有主观性且容易跑偏。此技能的目的是让搞笑的置顶评论可复制，以便团队中的任何人（如Smriti、Ansh等）都能达到Charlie的创作标准。

The Core Insight (read this first)

核心洞察（请先阅读）

The image carries the joke. The comment captions the image.
If the comment makes sense without the image, the comment is doing too much work. If the image needs the comment to be funny, the image is too weak.
This is why image generation comes FIRST. Always.
图片承载笑点，评论为图片配文。
如果没有图片评论依然通顺，说明评论承担了过多功能；如果需要评论才能让图片显得有趣，说明图片的表现力不足。
这就是为什么必须先生成图片提示词。永远如此。

THE PROCESS (follow in order)

操作流程（按顺序执行）

Step 1. Find the admission

步骤1：提炼核心自白

Every Charlie post hides one quiet confession. Examples:
  • "Cowork does most of my actual job now"
  • "I am embarrassingly dependent on Anthropic"
  • "I gave away a 9-month product for free"
  • "I am a sponsored creator who lost objectivity"
Write the admission as one sentence before doing anything else. If you cannot name the admission in one sentence, stop. The post is not pinned-comment material yet.
Charlie的每篇帖子都隐含着一句低调的自白。例如：
  • “现在我的大部分实际工作都是同事在做”
  • “我对Anthropic的依赖程度高得离谱”
  • “我把开发了9个月的产品免费送出去了”
  • “我是一名失去客观性的赞助创作者”
在进行其他操作前，先把这句自白写成一句话。 如果无法用一句话概括核心自白，请暂停。这篇帖子暂时不适合创作置顶评论。

Step 2. Build the image first

步骤2：先构建图片

Three rules for the image:
  1. One clear visual gag. The eye lands on it in under a second. Examples that worked: tie draped on a laptop keyboard, a shrine to Anthropic with a rose and candles, a banquet table where every other seat is a tech logo.
  2. Played completely straight. No winking. No thumbs up. No exaggerated faces. The humour comes from treating the absurd as normal.
  3. Charlie is the lower-status figure. Always. Claude wins. The logo wins. The mum wins. Charlie loses with quiet dignity.
Use the standard format:
"Using the person in the attached reference image, create a photorealistic image of [scene]. [One clear visual gag described in detail]. [Charlie's posture and expression, played straight]. [Lighting and framing notes]."
图片创作需遵循三条规则：
  1. 一个清晰的视觉笑点。观众能在1秒内捕捉到。成功案例：领带搭在笔记本电脑键盘上、为Anthropic搭建的带玫瑰和蜡烛的神龛、每张座位都印有科技品牌logo的宴会桌。
  2. 全程保持严肃风格。不要眨眼、不要竖大拇指、不要夸张表情。幽默源于将荒诞之事视为常态。
  3. Charlie始终处于弱势地位。永远如此。Claude赢、品牌logo赢、妈妈赢，Charlie带着体面的姿态认输。
使用标准格式：
“参考附件中的人物照片，生成一张写实风格的图片，内容为[场景]。[详细描述一个清晰的视觉笑点]。[Charlie的姿态和表情，保持严肃风格]。[光线和构图说明]。”

Step 3. Caption the image with the 4-line comment

步骤3：为图片配上4行式评论

The comment names what the image shows as if reporting the news.
Fixed structure:
📌 [Line 1: Describe the absurd thing as normal fact]
[Line 2: Flip Charlie's status downward]
[Line 3: A sad flex, the smallest possible win]
[Line 4: Resigned acceptance, no punchline reach]
评论要像报道新闻一样描述图片内容。
固定结构：
📌 [第1行：将荒诞之事描述为正常事实]
[第2行：强化Charlie的弱势地位]
[第3行：心酸的小炫耀，最微不足道的胜利]
[第4行：无奈接受，不刻意制造笑点]

Step 4. Run the 5 tests before sending

步骤4：发送前完成5项测试

  1. Image gag test. Can you describe the visual gag in 5 words? If not, the image is too busy. Simplify.
  2. Caption test. Does line 1 caption the image as fact? If line 1 sets up a separate joke, rewrite.
  3. Loser test. Is Charlie the lower-status figure in every line? If he wins anywhere, rewrite.
  4. Reach test. Does line 4 try too hard for a punchline? If yes, make the line smaller and sadder. Resigned beats clever.
  5. Boring-on-its-own test. Read the 4 lines without the image. Is the comment boring alone? Good. That means the image is doing the heavy lifting.
If any test fails, fix before sending.
  1. 图片笑点测试。能否用5个词描述视觉笑点？如果不能，说明图片过于复杂，请简化。
  2. 配文测试。第1行是否如实描述了图片内容？如果第1行单独设置了笑点，请重写。
  3. 弱势地位测试。Charlie在每一行中都处于弱势吗？如果他在任何一行中占上风，请重写。
  4. 刻意程度测试。第4行是否刻意追求巧妙的笑点？如果是，请让这句话更平淡、更心酸。无奈接受胜过刻意耍聪明。
  5. 单独无聊测试。脱离图片阅读这4行评论，是否显得无聊？很好，这说明图片承担了主要的笑点输出。
如果任何一项测试未通过，请修改后再发送。

THE 4-LINE RULES (non-negotiable)

4行式评论规则（不可协商）

  • Exactly 4 lines. No more, no less.
  • Each line is one complete sentence.
  • Each line is 40 characters max.
  • Start with 📌 on line 1.
  • No P.S. (line 4 IS the punchline)
  • No line breaks between sentences (they sit tight together)
  • British English throughout
  • No em dashes, no hashtags, no semicolons
  • Avoid Charlie's banned word list (just, that, very, really, actually, literally, etc.)
  • 严格4行，不多不少。
  • 每行都是完整句子。
  • 每行最多40个字符。
  • 第1行以📌开头。
  • 不要加附言（第4行就是收尾）
  • 句子之间不要换行（紧密排列）
  • 全程使用英式英语
  • 不要使用破折号、话题标签、分号
  • 避免使用Charlie禁用的词汇（just、that、very、really、actually、literally等）

GOLD STANDARD EXAMPLE

黄金标准示例

This is the benchmark. When in doubt, compare new comments against this one.
The image: Charlie sitting cross-legged on the floor in striped pyjamas eating cereal from a bowl, looking up at his own desk chair where an open laptop sits with a knotted necktie draped over the keyboard. A framed "Employee of the Month" certificate on the wall has the Claude logo and the name "Claude (Anthropic)" on it. Morning light, played completely straight.
The comment:
📌 Claude wears the tie now.
I wear the pyjamas.
The cereal was my idea, at least.
Small wins where you find them.
Why it works:
  • Line 1 captions the image as fact (the tie on the keyboard IS the gag)
  • Line 2 is the deadpan flip showing the status reversal
  • Line 3 is the saddest possible flex
  • Line 4 lands without reaching, just resigned acceptance
  • All 4 lines pass the loser test (Charlie loses in every one)
  • Read alone, the comment is mildly amusing. With the image, it sings.
这是基准案例。如有疑问，可将新评论与本案例对比。
图片内容：Charlie穿着条纹睡衣盘腿坐在地板上吃麦片，抬头看向自己的办公椅——椅子上放着一台打开的笔记本电脑，键盘上搭着一条打了结的领带。墙上挂着“月度最佳员工”证书，上面印着Claude（Anthropic）的logo和名字。清晨光线，全程保持严肃风格。
评论内容：
📌 Claude现在戴领带了。
我穿睡衣。
至少麦片是我的主意。
有小胜就不错了。
成功原因：
  • 第1行如实描述了图片内容（键盘上的领带就是笑点）
  • 第2行用冷幽默反转了地位
  • 第3行是最心酸的小炫耀
  • 第4行点到为止，仅表达无奈接受
  • 4行内容全部通过弱势地位测试（Charlie每一行都处于下风）
  • 单独阅读评论只是有点好笑，配上图片则效果拉满

OTHER PROVEN IMAGE GAGS (for reference)

其他已验证的视觉笑点（供参考）

  • Status reversal at the desk: Laptop in the chair wearing a tie, Charlie on the floor in pyjamas
  • The shrine: Candles, a rose, a framed Anthropic logo, a handwritten letter "To Dario", Charlie kneeling in prayer
  • The banquet table: Charlie at the head of the table with a paper crown, every other seat occupied by a tech logo (Stanford, Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft)
  • The therapist's couch: Charlie reclining looking happy, therapist looking concerned, Claude logo framed on the wall behind her
  • The boardroom: Charlie pointing at a presentation, every "executive" in the room is a tech logo
  • The pub vs the home office: Charlie smug at a pub table while his laptop visibly works through a window across the street
  • 办公桌地位反转：笔记本电脑坐在椅子上戴着领带，Charlie穿着睡衣坐在地板上
  • 神龛：蜡烛、玫瑰、装裱的Anthropic logo、写给Dario的手写信，Charlie跪着祈祷
  • 宴会桌：Charlie戴着纸皇冠坐在主位，其他每个座位都印有科技品牌logo（斯坦福、谷歌、OpenAI、Anthropic、微软）
  • 心理咨询 couch：Charlie躺着看起来很开心，咨询师一脸担忧，她身后墙上挂着Claude的logo
  • 会议室：Charlie指着演示文稿，房间里的每个“高管”都是科技品牌logo
  • 酒吧vs家庭办公室：Charlie在酒吧桌前一脸得意，而他的笔记本电脑正在街对面的窗户里加班

WHAT TO AVOID

需避免的情况

  • Comments that explain the image instead of captioning it
  • Comments that work without the image (the image becomes redundant)
  • Charlie winning, looking cool, or sounding smart in any line
  • Reaching for a clever punchline on line 4
  • Visual gags that take more than 5 words to describe
  • Wink-to-camera energy in either the image or the comment
  • More than one gag per image (one is sharper than three)
  • Sponsored brand names shoehorned into the comment (the post already does that)
  • 评论解释图片而非描述图片
  • 脱离图片依然成立的评论（图片变得多余）
  • Charlie在任何一行中获胜、看起来很酷或显得聪明
  • 第4行刻意追求巧妙的笑点
  • 需要超过5个词描述的视觉笑点
  • 图片或评论带有“ wink-to-camera”式的刻意卖萌
  • 一张图片包含多个笑点（一个笑点比三个更犀利）
  • 在评论中生硬植入赞助品牌名称（帖子本身已经完成了这项工作）

OUTPUT FORMAT

输出格式

When triggered, always output:
  1. The admission (one sentence, what the post is quietly confessing)
  2. The image prompt (full paragraph in the standard format)
  3. The 4-line comment (with 📌)
  4. A one-line note confirming the comment passed the 5 tests
Optionally provide 2-3 variations if the first attempt is borderline.
触发技能时，始终输出以下内容：
  1. 核心自白（一句话，帖子隐含的真实想法）
  2. 图片提示词（完整段落，使用标准格式）
  3. 4行式评论（带📌）
  4. 一句话说明，确认评论通过了5项测试
如果首次尝试效果一般，可额外提供2-3个变体。