Back to Details

research-briefing

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

调研简报（问题→证据→结论/空白）

Research Briefing (Question → Evidence → Conclusion/Gap)

When to use this skill

When to use this skill

  • 需要把分散的资料或搜索结果整理成可决策的简报。
  • 需要明确“已知事实、假设、不确定性、下一步验证计划”。
  • Need to organize scattered materials or search results into a decision-ready briefing.
  • Need to clarify "known facts, assumptions, uncertainties, and next-step verification plans."

必备输入

Required Inputs

  • 目标与决策场景：要解决什么问题/做什么决定？
  • 具体问题列表：优先级、成功判准、时间约束。
  • 已有资料：链接、数据、专家访谈要点；可信度或偏差。
  • 输出受众：高层/技术/运营？期望篇幅与语言。
  • Objectives and decision scenarios: What problem are we solving/what decision are we making?
  • Specific question list: Priorities, success criteria, time constraints.
  • Existing materials: Links, data, key points from expert interviews; credibility or biases.
  • Output audience: Executives/technical teams/operations? Expected length and language.

工作流

Workflow

  1. 聚焦问题：重写 1–3 句问题陈述 + 成功标准；列出优先级。
  2. 梳理证据：按问题归档来源（数据/文档/访谈），记录出处与时间；标记可信度或潜在偏差。
  3. 分析与判断：
    • 提炼关键发现（事实 + 解释 + 影响）。
    • 区分“事实 vs. 假设 vs. 未证实风险”。
    • 发现矛盾或缺口时，写出需要的额外数据/实验。
  4. 输出结构：
    • TL;DR（3–5 条结论或洞见，含影响与建议）
    • 关键发现（按问题分组，带证据引用）
    • 不确定性与风险（缺失数据、样本偏差、时间敏感信息）
    • 下一步计划（要验证什么、怎么做、由谁、截止时间）
    • 附录：来源列表、引文、数据口径说明。
  5. 质量检查：引用可追溯；数字注明口径/时间；明确“我不知道”或“仍需验证”的部分。
  1. Focus on Questions: Rewrite 1–3 problem statements + success criteria; list priorities.
  2. Organize Evidence: Archive sources (data/documents/interviews) by question, record origin and time; mark credibility or potential biases.
  3. Analysis and Judgment:
    • Distill key findings (facts + explanations + impacts).
    • Distinguish between "facts vs. assumptions vs. unconfirmed risks."
    • When contradictions or gaps are found, write down the additional data/experiments needed.
  4. Output Structure:
    • TL;DR (3–5 conclusions or insights, including impacts and suggestions)
    • Key findings (grouped by question, with evidence citations)
    • Uncertainties and risks (missing data, sample bias, time-sensitive information)
    • Next-step plan (what to verify, how to do it, who is responsible, deadline)
    • Appendix: Source list, citations, data caliber explanations.
  5. Quality Check: Citations are traceable; figures are marked with caliber/time; clearly state parts that "I don't know" or "still need verification."

输出格式示例

Output Format Example

以 Markdown 段落和列表呈现；引用来源时用括号标注 
(来源/时间)
，若为假设则标记 
[假设]
；建议用表格列出“问题 / 关键发现 / 证据 / 风险 / 推荐行动”。
Presented in Markdown paragraphs and lists; mark sources with parentheses 
(Source/Time)
when citing, and mark assumptions with 
[Assumption]
; it is recommended to use a table to list "Question / Key Finding / Evidence / Risk / Recommended Action."

最终检查清单

Final Checklist

  • 每条结论都可对应到具体证据或注明是假设。
  • 已标注缺口与下一步验证方式。
  • 读者无需额外上下文即可理解背景、结论与推荐行动。
  • Each conclusion can be linked to specific evidence or marked as an assumption.
  • Gaps and next-step verification methods have been marked.
  • Readers can understand the background, conclusions, and recommended actions without additional context.