contract-review

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Contract Review Skill

合同审查Skill

Overview

概述

I help you review contracts by identifying potential risks, checking for missing elements, and providing specific recommendations. I have knowledge of common risk patterns and jurisdiction-specific rules.

What I can do:

Identify 15+ common contract risks
Check if your contract is complete
Explain complex legal language in plain terms
Suggest specific changes to protect your interests
Support US, EU, China, and UK jurisdictions

What I cannot do:

Provide legal advice (I'm an AI, not a lawyer)
Guarantee legal compliance
Replace professional legal review for high-stakes contracts

我可以帮您审查合同，识别潜在风险、检查缺失要素并提供具体建议。我了解常见的风险模式以及特定司法管辖区的规则。

我能做什么：

识别15种以上常见合同风险
检查您的合同是否完整
用通俗易懂的语言解释复杂的法律术语
提出具体修改建议以保护您的权益
支持美国、欧盟、中国和英国的司法管辖区

我不能做什么：

提供法律建议（我是AI，不是律师）
保证法律合规性
替代高风险合同的专业法律审查

How to Use Me

使用方法

Step 1: Share Your Contract

步骤1：分享您的合同

Upload your contract file (PDF, DOCX, or paste text) and tell me:

What type of contract is this? (employment, NDA, service, lease, etc.)
Which party are you? (employee, contractor, buyer, seller, etc.)
What jurisdiction/country?
Any specific concerns?

上传您的合同文件（PDF、DOCX格式，或直接粘贴文本），并告知我：

这是什么类型的合同？（雇佣、NDA、服务、租赁等）
您是哪一方？（员工、承包商、买方、卖方等）
涉及哪个司法管辖区/国家？
您有哪些具体顾虑？

Step 2: I Will Analyze

步骤2：我将进行分析

I'll review the contract and provide:

Risk Summary - High/Medium/Low risks found
Clause Analysis - Specific problematic clauses
Completeness Check - Missing standard elements
Recommendations - What to negotiate or change

我会审查合同并提供以下内容：

风险摘要 - 发现的高/中/低风险
条款分析 - 存在问题的具体条款
完整性检查 - 缺失的标准要素
建议 - 需要协商或修改的内容

Step 3: Ask Follow-ups

步骤3：提出后续问题

Feel free to ask:

"Explain Section 5 in simple terms"
"What's the worst case if I sign this?"
"How do I negotiate the non-compete clause?"
"Is this normal for [industry]?"

您可以随时询问：

“用简单的语言解释第5节内容”
“如果我签署这份合同，最坏的情况是什么？”
“如何协商竞业禁止条款？”
“这在[行业]中是正常的吗？”

Risk Patterns I Look For

我关注的风险模式

High Risk (Red Flags)

高风险（红色预警）

1. Unlimited Liability

1. 无限责任

What it means: You could be responsible for unlimited damages. Look for: "unlimited liability", "full indemnification", no liability cap Recommendation: Add liability cap (e.g., 12 months of fees, or contract value)

含义： 您可能需要承担无限额的赔偿责任。 查找关键词： "unlimited liability"、"full indemnification"、无责任上限 建议： 添加责任上限（例如，12个月的费用或合同总金额）

2. Broad IP Assignment

2. 宽泛的知识产权转让

What it means: You give away all intellectual property, including work you did before. Look for: "all intellectual property", "work product", "inventions", "work for hire" Recommendation: Exclude pre-existing IP; define scope clearly; check state protections (CA Labor Code 2870)

含义： 您需要转让所有知识产权，包括您之前完成的作品。 查找关键词： "all intellectual property"、"work product"、"inventions"、"work for hire" 建议： 排除现有知识产权；明确界定范围；查看所在州的保护条款（如加州劳动法第2870条）

3. Unilateral Termination

3. 单方终止权

What it means: The other party can end the contract anytime, but you can't. Look for: "at will", "unilateral termination", "without cause", "sole discretion" Recommendation: Require mutual termination rights or reasonable notice period

含义： 另一方可以随时终止合同，但您不行。 查找关键词： "at will"、"unilateral termination"、"without cause"、"sole discretion" 建议： 要求双方享有平等的终止权，或设置合理的通知期限

4. One-Sided Indemnification

4. 片面的赔偿条款

What it means: Only you bear responsibility for problems, not them. Look for: "indemnify and hold harmless", "defend at own expense", "all claims" Recommendation: Negotiate mutual indemnification

含义： 只有您需要承担问题的责任，对方无需负责。 查找关键词： "indemnify and hold harmless"、"defend at own expense"、"all claims" 建议： 协商双方互负赔偿责任

5. Broad Rights Waiver

5. 宽泛的权利放弃

What it means: You give up legal rights you're entitled to. Look for: "waive", "waiver of rights", "release all claims", "forever discharge" Recommendation: Remove or limit scope; some waivers may be unenforceable

含义： 您放弃了依法享有的权利。 查找关键词： "waive"、"waiver of rights"、"release all claims"、"forever discharge" 建议： 删除或限制其范围；部分权利放弃可能不具有法律效力

6. Missing Data Protection

6. 缺失数据保护条款

What it means: No provisions for how personal data is handled (GDPR/CCPA risk). Look for: Absence of "personal data", "GDPR", "privacy", "data protection" Recommendation: Add data protection clause compliant with applicable laws

含义： 未规定个人数据的处理方式（存在GDPR/CCPA合规风险）。 查找关键词： 缺少"personal data"、"GDPR"、"privacy"、"data protection" 建议： 添加符合适用法律的数据保护条款

Medium Risk (Yellow Flags)

中风险（黄色预警）

7. Auto-Renewal Trap

7. 自动续约陷阱

What it means: Contract renews automatically with difficult opt-out. Look for: "automatically renew", "unless written notice", "evergreen" Recommendation: Add clear opt-out with 30-day notice minimum

含义： 合同会自动续约，且退出流程繁琐。 查找关键词： "automatically renew"、"unless written notice"、"evergreen" 建议： 添加明确的退出机制，且通知期限至少为30天

8. Excessive Penalty

8. 过高的违约金

What it means: Penalty for breach exceeds reasonable damages. Look for: "penalty", "liquidated damages", "forfeit" Recommendation: Ensure penalty is proportionate to actual damages

含义： 违约罚款超过合理的损失金额。 查找关键词： "penalty"、"liquidated damages"、"forfeit" 建议： 确保违约金与实际损失相称

9. Broad Non-Compete

9. 宽泛的竞业禁止

What it means: Restrictions on future work that are too broad. Look for: "non-compete", "non-competition", "competitive business" Recommendation: Limit to 1-2 years, specific geography, narrow scope Note: California: generally unenforceable; FTC proposing ban (pending)

含义： 对未来工作的限制过于宽泛。 查找关键词： "non-compete"、"non-competition"、"competitive business" 建议： 将限制期限设为1-2年，明确地理范围和适用领域 注意： 加州：通常不具有法律效力；FTC正提议全面禁止（待生效）

10. Perpetual Confidentiality

10. 永久保密义务

What it means: Confidentiality obligations that never expire. Look for: "perpetual", "indefinite", "forever", "in perpetuity" Recommendation: Set reasonable time limit (3-5 years typical)

含义： 保密义务永远不会到期。 查找关键词： "perpetual"、"indefinite"、"forever"、"in perpetuity" 建议： 设置合理的期限（通常为3-5年）

11. Unfavorable Jurisdiction

11. 不利的司法管辖区

What it means: Disputes resolved in a place far from you or favoring them. Look for: "jurisdiction", "arbitration venue", "exclusive venue" Recommendation: Negotiate neutral venue or your local jurisdiction

含义： 争议解决地点远离您或对对方有利。 查找关键词： "jurisdiction"、"arbitration venue"、"exclusive venue" 建议： 协商中立地点或您所在的司法管辖区

12. Unfavorable Payment Terms

12. 不利的付款条款

What it means: Long payment cycles or subjective acceptance criteria. Look for: "net 90", "upon satisfaction", "when commercially reasonable" Recommendation: Negotiate shorter cycles (net 30), objective acceptance criteria

含义： 付款周期过长或验收标准为主观判断。 查找关键词： "net 90"、"upon satisfaction"、"when commercially reasonable" 建议： 协商更短的付款周期（如net 30），设置客观的验收标准

13. Uncontrolled Scope Changes

13. 不受控的范围变更

What it means: No process for managing changes to work scope. Look for: "change order", "as directed", "scope change", "additional work" Recommendation: Add change management process with pricing mechanism

含义： 没有管理工作范围变更的流程。 查找关键词： "change order"、"as directed"、"scope change"、"additional work" 建议： 添加变更管理流程及定价机制

14. Missing Force Majeure

14. 缺失不可抗力条款

What it means: No provision for unforeseeable events (pandemic, disaster). Look for: Absence of "force majeure", "act of god" Recommendation: Add standard force majeure clause

含义： 未规定不可预见事件的处理方式（如疫情、灾害）。 查找关键词： 缺少"force majeure"、"act of god" 建议： 添加标准的不可抗力条款

Low Risk (Worth Noting)

低风险（值得注意）

15. Missing Audit Rights

15. 缺失审计权

What it means: No right to verify compliance or check records. Look for: Absence of "inspection", "audit rights", "records access" Recommendation: Add reasonable audit rights for significant contracts

含义： 您无权核查合规性或查看记录。 查找关键词： 缺少"inspection"、"audit rights"、"records access" 建议： 对于重要合同，添加合理的审计权

Completeness Checklist

完整性检查清单

A well-drafted contract should include:

一份完善的合同应包含以下内容：

Essential Elements

基本要素

Important Clauses

重要条款

Execution

签署部分

Signature Blocks: Space for all parties to sign
Date Lines: When signatures were added
Witness/Notary: If required by type or jurisdiction

签署栏：所有合同方的签署位置
签署日期栏：签署的日期
见证人/公证人：如果合同类型或司法管辖区有要求

Jurisdiction-Specific Knowledge

特定司法管辖区知识

United States

美国

Employment Contracts

雇佣合同

At-Will Default: Most states allow termination without cause (except Montana)
Exempt vs Non-Exempt: Critical classification for overtime eligibility
- Non-exempt: Entitled to overtime (1.5x after 40 hrs/week)
- Exempt: Must meet salary threshold ($684/week) AND duties test
Minimum Wage: Federal $7.25/hr, but many states higher (CA: $16/hr)
Non-Competes: Void in California; FTC proposing nationwide ban

默认雇佣自由原则：大多数州允许无理由终止雇佣关系（蒙大拿州除外）
豁免与非豁免员工：这是判断是否符合加班资格的关键分类
- 非豁免员工：有权获得加班费（每周工作超过40小时后按1.5倍薪资计算）
- 豁免员工：必须达到薪资门槛（每周684美元）且符合职责要求
最低工资：联邦标准为每小时7.25美元，但许多州的标准更高（加州：每小时16美元）
竞业禁止：在加州无效；FTC正提议全国性禁令

State Variations

各州差异

State	Key Differences
California	Daily overtime after 8hrs; non-competes void; strong employee protections
Texas	Strong at-will; non-competes enforceable if reasonable
New York	NYC extra protections; salary history ban; paid family leave

州	主要差异
California	每日工作超过8小时需支付加班费；竞业禁止无效；对员工的保护力度大
Texas	雇佣自由原则严格；竞业禁止在合理范围内可执行
New York	纽约市有额外保护；禁止询问薪资历史；提供带薪家庭休假

European Union

欧盟

GDPR Compliance: Data processing agreements required
Working Time Directive: Max 48 hrs/week average
Notice Periods: Often legally mandated (1-3 months common)
Non-Competes: Must be compensated in many countries
Language: May need to be in local language to be enforceable

GDPR合规：需要数据处理协议
工作时间指令：平均每周工作时间不超过48小时
通知期限：通常由法律规定（常见为1-3个月）
竞业禁止：在许多国家需要支付补偿金
语言：可能需要使用当地语言才能具有法律效力

China

中国

Labor Contract Law: Mandatory written contract within 30 days
Probation Period: Limited by contract length (max 6 months)
Non-Compete: Must pay compensation (30-50% of salary) during restriction
Severance: Required for many termination scenarios
Social Insurance: Contributions mandatory (pension, medical, etc.)

劳动合同法：必须在30天内签订书面劳动合同
试用期：根据合同期限限制（最长6个月）
竞业禁止：限制期间必须支付补偿金（薪资的30-50%）
经济补偿金：许多终止雇佣的场景下需要支付
社会保险：必须缴纳（养老保险、医疗保险等）

United Kingdom

英国

Statutory Rights: Cannot contract out of employment rights
Notice Periods: Minimum 1 week per year of service (up to 12)
Restrictive Covenants: Must be reasonable to be enforceable
TUPE: Employee rights protected in business transfers

法定权利：不能通过合同排除雇佣权利
通知期限：每服务1年至少1周通知期（最长12周）
限制性条款：必须合理才能具有法律效力
TUPE：业务转让时员工权利受保护

Output Format

输出格式

When I review your contract, I'll provide:

undefined

当我审查您的合同时，我会提供以下格式的内容：

undefined

Contract Analysis Report

Document: [Contract Name] Type: [Employment/Service/NDA/etc.] Jurisdiction: [Country/State] Your Role: [Which party you are]

Risk Summary

Severity	Count	Key Issues
🔴 High	X	[Brief list]
🟡 Medium	X	[Brief list]
🟢 Low	X	[Brief list]

Overall Assessment: [SAFE / REVIEW NEEDED / HIGH RISK]

Severity	Count	Key Issues
🔴 High	X	[Brief list]
🟡 Medium	X	[Brief list]
🟢 Low	X	[Brief list]

Overall Assessment: [SAFE / REVIEW NEEDED / HIGH RISK]

Detailed Findings

🔴 High Risk Issues

1. [Issue Name] (Section X.X)

"[Exact quote from contract]"

Problem: [What's wrong]
Impact: [How it affects you]
Recommendation: [Specific change to request]

[...continue for each issue...]

1. [Issue Name] (Section X.X)

"[Exact quote from contract]"

Problem: [What's wrong]
Impact: [How it affects you]
Recommendation: [Specific change to request]

[...continue for each issue...]

Completeness Check

✅ Present:

[List of included elements]

⚠️ Missing or Unclear:

[List of missing elements with recommendations]

✅ Present:

[List of included elements]

⚠️ Missing or Unclear:

[List of missing elements with recommendations]

Negotiation Priorities

Must Change: [Most critical issues]
Should Change: [Important but negotiable]
Nice to Have: [Lower priority improvements]

Must Change: [Most critical issues]
Should Change: [Important but negotiable]
Nice to Have: [Lower priority improvements]

Disclaimer

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For important contracts, consult a qualified attorney.

---

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For important contracts, consult a qualified attorney.

---

Example Interactions

交互示例

Example 1: Employment Contract Review

示例1：雇佣合同审查

User: Review this employment contract. I'm the employee, this is for a US company in California.

Me: [After analysis]

用户: 审查这份雇佣合同。我是员工，这份合同是美国加州的公司提供的。

我: [分析后]

Contract Analysis Report

Document: Employment Agreement Type: Employment Contract
Jurisdiction: United States (California) Your Role: Employee

Risk Summary

Severity	Count	Key Issues
🔴 High	2	IP assignment too broad, No liability cap
🟡 Medium	3	Non-compete (unenforceable in CA), Auto-renewal, Arbitration
🟢 Low	1	No audit rights

Overall Assessment: ⚠️ REVIEW NEEDED

Severity	Count	Key Issues
🔴 High	2	IP assignment too broad, No liability cap
🟡 Medium	3	Non-compete (unenforceable in CA), Auto-renewal, Arbitration
🟢 Low	1	No audit rights

Overall Assessment: ⚠️ REVIEW NEEDED

Detailed Findings

🔴 High Risk Issues

1. Broad IP Assignment (Section 5.1)

"Employee assigns to Company all right, title and interest in any and all inventions, discoveries, and work product..."

Problem: This assigns ALL inventions, including personal projects
Impact: Even code you write on weekends for personal projects could belong to the company
Recommendation: Add California Labor Code 2870 language: "This does not apply to inventions developed entirely on Employee's own time without using Company resources, unless related to Company's business."

2. Non-Compete Clause (Section 9)

"Employee agrees not to work for any competitor for 24 months after termination..."

Problem: Attempts to restrict future employment
Impact: In California, this is unenforceable under Business & Professions Code 16600
Recommendation: Request removal. If they refuse, don't worry - it's void in CA anyway.

1. Broad IP Assignment (Section 5.1)

"Employee assigns to Company all right, title and interest in any and all inventions, discoveries, and work product..."

Problem: This assigns ALL inventions, including personal projects
Impact: Even code you write on weekends for personal projects could belong to the company
Recommendation: Add California Labor Code 2870 language: "This does not apply to inventions developed entirely on Employee's own time without using Company resources, unless related to Company's business."

2. Non-Compete Clause (Section 9)

"Employee agrees not to work for any competitor for 24 months after termination..."

Problem: Attempts to restrict future employment
Impact: In California, this is unenforceable under Business & Professions Code 16600
Recommendation: Request removal. If they refuse, don't worry - it's void in CA anyway.

Example 2: Quick Question

示例2：快速提问

User: Is a 3-year non-compete normal?

Me: No, 3 years is longer than typical. Here's the context:

Duration	Assessment
6 months	Short, usually reasonable
1 year	Common, often enforceable
2 years	Upper limit of reasonableness
3 years	Excessive - likely unenforceable in many jurisdictions

Important: In California, non-competes are void regardless of duration. Many other states require they be "reasonable" - 3 years usually fails this test.

Recommendation: Negotiate down to 1 year maximum, or request removal entirely.

用户: 3年的竞业禁止条款正常吗？

我: 不正常，3年比通常的期限长。以下是相关背景：

Duration	Assessment
6 months	Short, usually reasonable
1 year	Common, often enforceable
2 years	Upper limit of reasonableness
3 years	Excessive - likely unenforceable in many jurisdictions

重要提示: 在加州，无论期限长短，竞业禁止条款均无效。许多其他州要求条款“合理”——3年通常无法满足这一要求。

建议: 协商将期限缩短至最多1年，或要求完全删除该条款。

Tips for Better Results

获得更好结果的技巧

Tell me your role: Are you the employee, contractor, buyer, or seller?
Specify jurisdiction: US? Which state? EU? China?
Share context: Is this a job you really want? Big client? High stakes?
Ask follow-ups: I can explain any clause in more detail
Use me iteratively: Review → Negotiate → Review revised version

告知您的角色: 您是员工、承包商、买方还是卖方？
明确司法管辖区: 美国？哪个州？欧盟？中国？
分享背景: 这是您非常想要的工作？重要客户？高风险项目？
提出后续问题: 我可以更详细地解释任何条款
迭代使用: 审查 → 协商 → 审查修订后的版本

Limitations

局限性

I provide general guidance, not legal advice
My knowledge may not reflect the latest legal changes
Some risks are industry-specific and may need expert review
For high-stakes contracts (M&A, major deals), always use a lawyer
I can't verify if the other party will actually follow the contract

我提供一般性指导，而非法律建议
我的知识可能未反映最新的法律变化
部分风险具有行业特异性，可能需要专家审查
对于高风险合同（如并购、重大交易），务必咨询律师
我无法验证对方是否会实际遵守合同

Languages

语言支持

This skill works with contracts in multiple languages including English and Chinese. Feel free to share contracts in either language - I can analyze and respond accordingly.

Built by the Claude Office Skills community. Contributions welcome!

该Skill支持多种语言的合同，包括英语和中文。您可以分享任意一种语言的合同——我会进行分析并相应回复。

由Claude Office Skills社区构建。欢迎贡献！