plan-gap-analysis

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Plan Gap Analysis

计划差距分析

Analyze gaps between documented plans in

plans/

and actual implementation.

分析

plans/

目录中记录的计划与实际实现之间的差距。

Workflow

工作流程

Phase 1: Plan Inventory

阶段1：计划盘点

Read all plan files:

```
00-overview.md
```
- Project summary and metrics
```
01-understand.md
```
- Requirements and components
```
02-plan.md
```
- Architecture decisions and roadmap
```
03-execute.md
```
- Implementation details
```
04-review.md
```
- Quality requirements
```
05-secure.md
```
- Security requirements
```
06-feedback-loop.md
```
- Refinements

读取所有计划文件：

```
00-overview.md
```
- 项目概述与指标
```
01-understand.md
```
- 需求与组件
```
02-plan.md
```
- 架构决策与路线图
```
03-execute.md
```
- 实现细节
```
04-review.md
```
- 质量要求
```
05-secure.md
```
- 安全要求
```
06-feedback-loop.md
```
- 优化改进

Phase 2: Codebase Inventory

阶段2：代码库盘点

bash

undefined

bash

undefined

List all crates

find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "/target/"

List source files

find . -name ".rs" -not -path "/target/*"


**Crates to analyze**:
- `memory-core` - Core data structures and orchestration
- `memory-storage-turso` - Turso/libSQL backend
- `memory-storage-redb` - redb cache layer
- `memory-mcp` - MCP server and sandbox
- `test-utils` - Test utilities
- `benches` - Performance benchmarks

find . -name ".rs" -not -path "/target/*"


**需要分析的Crates**:
- `memory-core` - 核心数据结构与编排
- `memory-storage-turso` - Turso/libSQL后端
- `memory-storage-redb` - redb缓存层
- `memory-mcp` - MCP服务器与沙箱
- `test-utils` - 测试工具
- `benches` - 性能基准测试

Phase 3: Gap Identification

阶段3：差距识别

Check each phase:

Phase	Focus Areas
UNDERSTAND	Data structures, type definitions
PLAN	Architectural decisions, success metrics
EXECUTE	Storage, learning, MCP features
REVIEW	FR1-FR7, NFR1-NFR6 tests
SECURE	Attack surfaces, mitigations
FEEDBACK	Edge cases, optimizations

检查每个阶段:

阶段	重点领域
UNDERSTAND	数据结构、类型定义
PLAN	架构决策、成功指标
EXECUTE	存储、学习功能、MCP特性
REVIEW	FR1-FR7、NFR1-NFR6测试
SECURE	攻击面、缓解措施
FEEDBACK	边缘情况、性能优化

Phase 4: Prioritization

阶段4：优先级划分

Critical (Blocks production):

Security vulnerabilities
Data corruption risks
Missing core functionality

High (Affects quality):

Performance targets not met
Test coverage below target
Missing error handling

Medium (Technical debt):

Code quality issues
Documentation gaps

严重（阻碍生产）:

安全漏洞
数据损坏风险
核心功能缺失

高（影响质量）:

未达到性能目标
测试覆盖率低于目标
缺少错误处理

中（技术债务）:

代码质量问题
文档缺失

Phase 5: TODO Generation

阶段5：生成待办事项

markdown

undefined

markdown

undefined

Phase [N]: [NAME]

阶段[N]：[名称]

Critical Priority

严重优先级

[Component] - [Missing item]
- File: path/to/file.rs
- Plan: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
- Impact: [Description]
- Effort: [Estimate]

undefined

[组件] - [缺失项]
- File: path/to/file.rs
- Plan: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
- 影响: [描述]
- 工作量: [预估]

undefined

Output Format

输出格式

markdown

undefined

markdown

undefined

Plan Gap Analysis Report

计划差距分析报告

Total Requirements: X Implemented: Y (Z%) Gaps Identified: N

总需求数: X 已实现: Y (Z%) 识别出的差距: N

By Phase

按阶段划分

Phase 1: X/Y complete
Phase 2: X/Y complete
...

阶段1：X/Y已完成
阶段2：X/Y已完成
...

Critical Gaps

严重差距

[Gap] - Priority, Effort

undefined

[差距内容] - 优先级、工作量

undefined

Best Practices

最佳实践

✓ Be systematic: Check every requirement ✓ Be specific: Reference exact file locations ✓ Be accurate: Verify, don't assume ✓ Be prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low ✓ Be actionable: Include file paths and estimates

✓ 系统化：检查每一项需求 ✓ 具体化：引用确切的文件位置 ✓ 精准化：验证而非假设 ✓ 分优先级：严重 > 高 > 中 > 低 ✓ 可执行：包含文件路径与预估工作量