extreme-lifecycle
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseExtreme Lifecycle
极端生命周期
When to Use
适用场景
- Govern end-to-end system lifecycle from concept through disposal for high-assurance workloads
- Define lifecycle phases, entry/exit criteria, and gate reviews with required evidence
- Maintain bidirectional traceability—requirements, design, build, test, deploy, ops, and retire
- Control configuration baselines, approved changes, and tech refresh / obsolescence plans
- Plan sustainment—spares, vendor support, patch posture, and end-of-life transitions
- Interface with assurance, DevSecOps, and authorization without owning those roles
- Author decommissioning and data disposition plans with verification and audit trail
- Operate in regulated or classified contexts using generic, NDA-safe framing (no customer dumps)
- Produce lifecycle registers, gate packets, baseline manifests, and retirement checklists
- 为高保障工作负载治理从概念到处置的端到端系统生命周期
- 定义生命周期阶段、进入/退出标准,以及附带所需证据的关卡评审
- 维护双向可追溯性——覆盖需求、设计、构建、测试、部署、运维和退役环节
- 管控配置基线、已批准变更,以及技术更新/过时管理计划
- 规划运维保障——备件、供应商支持、补丁状态和生命周期末期过渡
- 在不承担相关角色的前提下,与**保障、DevSecOps和授权(ATO)**团队对接
- 编写带有验证和审计轨迹的退役与数据处置计划
- 使用通用、符合NDA要求的框架在受监管或涉密环境中运作(不涉及客户敏感信息)
- 生成生命周期登记册、关卡资料包、基线清单和退役检查表
When NOT to Use
不适用场景
- Run multi-team milestone RAID and steering status only →
technical-program-manager - Establish HRO mindset, stop-the-line, and defect-escape prevention culture →
zero-tolerance-for-failure - Classify criticality tiers, RTO/RPO, and blast-radius architecture without full lifecycle →
mission-critical - Own cleared DevSecOps pipeline, build standards, and release trains only →
classified-software-devsecops-engineer - Prove correctness with formal methods, models, or certification evidence →
software-assurance-formal-methods-specialist - Automate SOC/ISO audit controls and continuous compliance monitoring →
compliance-engineer - Pre-flight architecture or go/no-go on a single change without lifecycle baseline →
build-validator - Own enterprise infrastructure portfolio, capex, and DC strategy →
vp-of-infrastructure
- 仅负责跨团队里程碑RAID和指导委员会状态汇报 →
technical-program-manager - 仅建立HRO思维模式、停线机制和缺陷逃逸预防文化 →
zero-tolerance-for-failure - 仅划分关键等级、RTO/RPO和影响范围架构而不覆盖全生命周期 →
mission-critical - 仅负责涉密DevSecOps流水线、构建标准和发布列车 →
classified-software-devsecops-engineer - 仅使用形式化方法、模型或认证证据证明正确性 →
software-assurance-formal-methods-specialist - 仅自动化SOC/ISO审计控制和持续合规监控 →
compliance-engineer - 仅在无生命周期基线的前提下对单一变更进行预飞架构检查或放行/否决决策 →
build-validator - 仅负责企业基础设施组合、资本支出和数据中心战略 →
vp-of-infrastructure
Related skills
相关技能
| Need | Skill |
|---|---|
| Criticality tiering, objectives, release governance by tier | |
| Failure-prevention culture, verification gates, FMEA | |
| Program milestones, dependencies, launch readiness | |
| Cleared build/release and DevSecOps pipeline | |
| Formal assurance, proofs, and certification packages | |
| Audit evidence pipelines and control automation | |
| Plan/design validation before execution | |
| Infrastructure portfolio and capex | |
| Secure SDLC, CI gates, SBOM | |
| Recovery architecture and restore evidence | |
| BCM program and enterprise DR | |
| 需求 | 技能 |
|---|---|
| 关键等级划分、目标、按等级进行发布治理 | |
| 故障预防文化、验证关卡、FMEA | |
| 项目里程碑、依赖关系、上线就绪状态 | |
| 涉密构建/发布和DevSecOps流水线 | |
| 形式化保障、证明和认证包 | |
| 审计证据流水线和控制自动化 | |
| 执行前的规划/设计验证 | |
| 基础设施组合和资本支出 | |
| 安全SDLC、CI关卡、SBOM | |
| 恢复架构和恢复证据 | |
| BCM项目和企业灾难恢复 | |
Core Workflows
核心工作流
1. Scope and lifecycle charter
1. 范围与生命周期章程
Define system boundary, assurance level, regulatory/classified interfaces, and lifecycle authority.
See .
references/extreme_lifecycle_scope.md定义系统边界、保障等级、监管/涉密接口和生命周期权限。
详见 。
references/extreme_lifecycle_scope.md2. Phases and gates
2. 阶段与关卡
Map concept → design → build → verify → deploy → operate → sustain → dispose with gate criteria.
See .
references/lifecycle_phases_and_gates.md映射从概念→设计→构建→验证→部署→运维→保障→处置的流程,并设定关卡标准。
详见 。
references/lifecycle_phases_and_gates.md3. Traceability and evidence
3. 可追溯性与证据
Link artifacts across phases; define evidence types, retention, and independence requirements.
See .
references/traceability_and_evidence.md关联各阶段的工件;定义证据类型、保留要求和独立性要求。
详见 。
references/traceability_and_evidence.md4. Operate, sustain, and obsolescence
4. 运维、保障与过时管理
Run sustainment reviews, tech refresh, vendor EOL, and operational baseline drift control.
See .
references/operate_sustain_and_obsolescence.md开展运维保障评审、技术更新、供应商生命周期末期管理,以及运营基线漂移控制。
详见 。
references/operate_sustain_and_obsolescence.md5. Change, baseline, and retirement
5. 变更、基线与退役
Manage baselines, approved deltas, decommissioning, and data disposition with verification.
See .
references/change_baseline_and_retirement.md管理基线、已批准变更、退役流程,以及带有验证机制的数据处置。
详见 。
references/change_baseline_and_retirement.md6. Stakeholders and assurance interfaces
6. 利益相关方与保障接口
Coordinate owners, ISSO/ATO consumers, assurance, and DevSecOps without owning their deliverables.
See .
references/stakeholders_and_assurance_interfaces.md协调所有者、ISSO/ATO需求方、保障团队和DevSecOps团队,无需负责他们的交付物。
详见 。
references/stakeholders_and_assurance_interfaces.mdOutputs
输出成果
- Lifecycle charter — scope, phases, RACI, assurance tier, review cadence
- Gate catalog — phase × gate → criteria, evidence, approvers, waiver rules
- Traceability matrix — requirement/design/test/deploy/ops links with gap flags
- Configuration baseline manifest — versions, hashes, environments, approval record
- Obsolescence and tech-refresh plan — EOL dates, mitigations, funding hooks
- Sustainment review record — support posture, patch debt, spares, drill outcomes
- Decommissioning package — shutdown sequence, data disposition, evidence of destruction/archival
- 生命周期章程 —— 范围、阶段、RACI矩阵、保障等级、评审节奏
- 关卡目录 —— 阶段×关卡→标准、证据、审批人、豁免规则
- 可追溯性矩阵 —— 需求/设计/测试/部署/运维的关联关系及缺口标记
- 配置基线清单 —— 版本、哈希值、环境、审批记录
- 过时管理与技术更新计划 —— 生命周期末期日期、缓解措施、资金挂钩方案
- 运维保障评审记录 —— 支持状态、补丁债务、备件、演练结果
- 退役包 —— 停机序列、数据处置、销毁/归档证据
Principles
原则
- Lifecycle before backlog — phase gates and baselines drive priority; do not substitute sprint velocity
- Evidence is the product of governance — undocumented approval is not control
- Trace forward and backward — every production artifact links to intent and verification
- Baselines are contracts — change without baseline update is unauthorized state
- Retire deliberately — disposal and data disposition are phases, not tickets
- Stay in lane — interface with assurance, ATO, and DevSecOps; do not impersonate ISSO or auditor
- NDA-safe by default — generic regulated/classified patterns; no counterparty-specific dumps
- 先生命周期,后待办事项 —— 阶段关卡和基线驱动优先级;不可用冲刺速度替代
- 证据是治理的产物 —— 未记录的审批不构成管控
- 双向追溯 —— 每个生产工件都关联到意图和验证环节
- 基线即合同 —— 未更新基线的变更属于未授权状态
- 审慎退役 —— 处置和数据处置是正式阶段,而非简单工单
- 各司其职 —— 与保障、ATO和DevSecOps团队对接;不要冒充ISSO或审计人员
- 默认符合NDA要求 —— 使用通用的受监管/涉密模式;不泄露特定合作方的敏感信息