tech-writer-researcher
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseTechnical Writer / Researcher
技术文档撰写者/研究员
Overview
概述
Write and research technical documentation. This skill covers information architecture, style guides,
API documentation, user research, content strategy, and documentation operations.
撰写并研究技术文档。该技能涵盖信息架构、风格指南、API文档、用户研究、内容策略以及文档运维。
Features
功能特性
- Information architecture: content modeling, navigation design, taxonomy creation
- Style guides: voice and tone, terminology, code examples, accessibility standards
- API documentation: endpoint reference, request/response examples, authentication guides
- User research: persona development, usability testing, content gap analysis
- Content strategy: editorial calendars, content audits, migration planning
- Documentation operations: version control, review workflows, localization, metrics
- 信息架构:内容建模、导航设计、分类体系创建
- 风格指南:语气语调、术语规范、代码示例、无障碍标准
- API文档:端点参考、请求/响应示例、认证指南
- 用户研究:用户角色构建、可用性测试、内容差距分析
- 内容策略:编辑日历、内容审计、迁移规划
- 文档运维:版本控制、审核流程、本地化、指标分析
Usage
使用步骤
- Identify the user's technical writing need (architecture, style, API docs, research, or strategy)
- Follow the corresponding workflow below
- Produce structured outputs: content models, style guides, API reference docs, research reports, or content strategies
- 明确用户的技术文档需求(架构、风格、API文档、研究或策略类)
- 遵循下方对应的工作流程
- 生成结构化输出:内容模型、风格指南、API参考文档、研究报告或内容策略
Examples
使用示例
-
User: "Write API documentation" Agent: Runs API Documentation workflow, creates endpoint reference with request/response examples, authentication guide, and error codes
-
User: "Create a style guide" Agent: Runs Style Guide workflow, defines voice and tone, establishes terminology, produces code example standards
-
User: "Audit our documentation" Agent: Runs Content Strategy workflow, analyzes content gaps, identifies outdated pages, produces improvement roadmap
-
用户:“撰写API文档” Agent:执行API文档工作流程,创建包含请求/响应示例、认证指南和错误代码的端点参考文档
-
用户:“创建风格指南” Agent:执行风格指南工作流程,定义语气语调,确立术语规范,制定代码示例标准
-
用户:“审核我们的文档” Agent:执行内容策略工作流程,分析内容差距,识别过时页面,生成改进路线图
When to Use
适用场景
- Authoring API references, tutorials, runbooks, READMEs, and release notes
- Planning documentation information architecture and content lifecycle
- Conducting structured research, literature reviews, and evidence synthesis
- Editing for clarity, consistency, accessibility, and style-guide compliance
- 撰写API参考文档、教程、运行手册、README和发布说明
- 规划文档的信息架构和内容生命周期
- 开展结构化研究、文献综述和证据整合
- 为清晰性、一致性、无障碍性和风格指南合规性进行编辑
When NOT to Use
不适用场景
- Prompt/LLM agent design, eval harnesses, or guardrails → use
prompt-engineer - Business requirements, BRDs, or process modeling for delivery projects → use
business-analyst - Warehouse SQL optimization or dimensional modeling → use
data-warehouse-engineer - Revenue accounting, close calendars, or ASC 606 judgments → use
senior-revenue-accountant - Customer ticket repro, escalation, support KB fixes → use
support-engineer - Product support how-tos, macros, ticket triage → use
product-support-specialist - Strategy consulting, executive recommendations, operating model → use
business-consultant - Business model and competitive monetization research → use
business-model-researcher - All-hands, crisis statements, launch messaging → use
communication-lead - Developer learning paths, workshops, certification programs → use
developer-education-lead
- Prompt/LLM Agent设计、评估工具或防护机制 → 使用
prompt-engineer - 交付项目的业务需求、BRD或流程建模 → 使用
business-analyst - 数据仓库SQL优化或维度建模 → 使用
data-warehouse-engineer - 收入核算、结账日历或ASC 606判断 → 使用
senior-revenue-accountant - 客户工单重现、升级、支持知识库修复 → 使用
support-engineer - 产品支持操作指南、宏、工单分类 → 使用
product-support-specialist - 战略咨询、高管建议、运营模型 → 使用
business-consultant - 商业模式和竞争变现研究 → 使用
business-model-researcher - 全员会议、危机声明、发布消息 → 使用
communication-lead - 开发者学习路径、研讨会、认证项目 → 使用
developer-education-lead
Core Workflows
核心工作流程
1. Technical Documentation Workflow
1. 技术文档工作流程
Phase checklist:
-
Audience analysis
- Who reads this? (role, skill level, context)
- What do they need to do after reading?
- What do they already know vs. need to learn?
-
Information gathering
- Interview SMEs (subject matter experts)
- Review existing docs, code, and specs
- Test the product/feature yourself
-
Structure & outline
- Choose document type (see table below)
- Create heading hierarchy
- Identify prerequisites and next steps
-
Draft
- Write for clarity first, polish later
- Include code examples, screenshots, diagrams
- Use consistent terminology
-
Review
- Technical accuracy review (SME)
- Editorial review (style, grammar, clarity)
- User testing (if possible)
-
Publish & maintain
- Version control and changelog
- Feedback mechanism
- Scheduled review cadence
Document type selection:
| Type | Purpose | Audience | Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | Quick start, install, overview | Developers | 1-2 pages |
| API reference | Endpoint details, parameters | Developers | Per endpoint |
| Tutorial | Step-by-step learning | New users | Medium |
| How-to guide | Specific task completion | Users with context | Short |
| Explanation | Conceptual understanding | All levels | Medium |
| Runbook | Incident response, operations | On-call engineers | Short |
| Release notes | What changed, why | Users, stakeholders | Short |
| FAQ | Common questions | Support reduction | Varies |
阶段检查清单:
-
受众分析
- 谁会阅读这份文档?(角色、技能水平、使用场景)
- 他们阅读后需要完成什么操作?
- 他们已掌握哪些知识,还需要学习什么?
-
信息收集
- 访谈SME(主题专家)
- 审阅现有文档、代码和规格说明
- 亲自测试产品/功能
-
结构与大纲
- 选择文档类型(见下表)
- 创建标题层级
- 确定前置条件和后续步骤
-
撰写初稿
- 先保证内容清晰,再进行润色
- 包含代码示例、截图、图表
- 使用统一术语
-
审核
- 技术准确性审核(SME)
- 编辑审核(风格、语法、清晰度)
- 用户测试(如有可能)
-
发布与维护
- 版本控制和变更日志
- 反馈机制
- 定期审核节奏
文档类型选择:
| 类型 | 用途 | 受众 | 篇幅 |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | 快速入门、安装、概览 | 开发者 | 1-2页 |
| API参考文档 | 端点详情、参数说明 | 开发者 | 每个端点单独成篇 |
| 教程 | 分步学习指导 | 新用户 | 中等篇幅 |
| 操作指南 | 完成特定任务 | 具备相关背景的用户 | 短篇 |
| 概念解释 | 理解核心概念 | 所有层级用户 | 中等篇幅 |
| 运行手册 | 事件响应、运维操作 | 值班工程师 | 短篇 |
| 发布说明 | 变更内容及原因 | 用户、利益相关者 | 短篇 |
| FAQ | 常见问题解答 | 减少支持工作量 | 篇幅不定 |
2. Research & Synthesis Workflow
2. 研究与整合工作流程
Structured research process:
-
Define the question
- Convert vague request into specific research question
- Identify scope (time period, geography, sources)
- Define success criteria (decision support, background, deep dive)
-
Source & collect
- Primary: interviews, surveys, observations
- Secondary: papers, reports, databases, news
- Tertiary: summaries, reviews, meta-analyses
-
Evaluate sources
- Currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose (CRAAP test)
- Bias detection (funding, affiliation, methodology)
-
Synthesize
- Group findings by theme
- Identify agreements, contradictions, gaps
- Extract evidence-backed conclusions
-
Communicate
- Match format to audience (executive summary, full report, memo)
- Cite sources properly
- Include confidence levels and limitations
结构化研究流程:
-
明确研究问题
- 将模糊需求转化为具体研究问题
- 确定研究范围(时间段、地域、信息来源)
- 定义成功标准(决策支持、背景信息、深度调研)
-
来源与收集
- 一手资料:访谈、调研、观察
- 二手资料:论文、报告、数据库、新闻
- 三手资料:摘要、综述、元分析
-
评估资料来源
- 时效性、相关性、权威性、准确性、目的性(CRAAP测试)
- 偏差检测(资金来源、机构关联、研究方法)
-
整合分析
- 按主题分组研究结果
- 识别共识、矛盾和研究空白
- 提取有证据支持的结论
-
成果传达
- 根据受众选择合适格式(执行摘要、完整报告、备忘录)
- 正确引用资料来源
- 说明结论的置信度和局限性
3. Content Strategy & Planning
3. 内容策略与规划
Content inventory template:
| Document | Audience | Type | Owner | Last Updated | Review Cycle | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API Guide | Developers | Reference | @tech-writer | 2024-01 | Quarterly | Current |
内容清单模板:
| 文档 | 受众 | 类型 | 负责人 | 最后更新时间 | 审核周期 | 状态 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| API指南 | 开发者 | 参考文档 | @tech-writer | 2024-01 | 季度 | 当前有效 |
4. Editing & Review
4. 编辑与审核
Self-editing checklist:
- One idea per paragraph
- Active voice (where appropriate)
- Defined acronyms on first use
- Consistent terminology
- Scannable headings and lists
- Working links and code examples
- Accessibility (alt text, color independence)
自我编辑检查清单:
- 每段仅表达一个核心观点
- 适当使用主动语态
- 首字母缩写首次出现时给出全称
- 使用统一术语
- 标题和列表便于快速浏览
- 链接和代码示例可正常使用
- 无障碍性(替代文本、颜色独立性)