market-analysis

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

DeFi Market Analysis

DeFi 市场分析

Valuation Ratios

估值比率

Pre-computed in

defillama:get_protocol_metrics

and

defillama:get_category_metrics

```
ps_ratio
```
= mcap / annualised revenue. Lower = potentially undervalued relative to revenue.
```
pf_ratio
```
= mcap / annualised fees. Lower = more fee-efficient valuation.

在

defillama:get_protocol_metrics

和

defillama:get_category_metrics

中预先计算：

```
ps_ratio
```
= 市值 / 年化收入。数值越低，相对于收入而言可能被低估。
```
pf_ratio
```
= 市值 / 年化手续费。数值越低，手续费层面的估值效率越高。

Growth Screening

增长筛选

Use

*_pct_change

columns for momentum analysis. Values are decimals (0.35 = +35%, -0.13 = -13%).

Available windows:

*_7d_pct_change

*_30d_pct_change

*_90d_pct_change

Metrics with pct_change:

tvl_base

fees_1d

revenue_1d

price

volume_dexs_1d

Sort by any pct_change column to find fastest movers.

使用

*_pct_change

列进行动量分析。数值为小数（0.35 = +35%，-0.13 = -13%）。

可用时间窗口：

*_7d_pct_change

*_30d_pct_change

*_90d_pct_change

支持pct_change的指标：

tvl_base

fees_1d

revenue_1d

price

volume_dexs_1d

按任意pct_change列排序，即可找到增长最快的标的。

Protocol Comparison

协议对比

Use array params for side-by-side comparison in a single call:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(
  protocol: ["aave", "compound-v3", "morpho"],
  metrics: ["tvl_base", "fees_1d", "revenue_1d", "ps_ratio"]
)

This returns one row per protocol, which is more efficient than calling once per protocol.

使用数组参数在单次调用中进行并列对比：

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(
  protocol: ["aave", "compound-v3", "morpho"],
  metrics: ["tvl_base", "fees_1d", "revenue_1d", "ps_ratio"]
)

此调用会返回每个协议对应的一行数据，比逐个调用协议更高效。

Category Comparison

品类对比

Use

defillama:get_category_metrics

to compare DeFi sectors:

defillama:get_category_metrics(
  category: "Lending",
  metrics: ["tvl_base", "fees_1d", "protocol_count"]
)

Call once per category in parallel for side-by-side comparison.

使用

defillama:get_category_metrics

对比DeFi各细分领域：

defillama:get_category_metrics(
  category: "Lending",
  metrics: ["tvl_base", "fees_1d", "protocol_count"]
)

可并行调用该接口对比不同品类。

Token Sector Screening

代币领域筛选

Use

defillama:get_token_prices

for token-level analysis:

defillama:get_token_prices(token: "coingecko:ethereum", period: "30d")

使用

defillama:get_token_prices

进行代币层面分析：

defillama:get_token_prices(token: "coingecko:ethereum", period: "30d")

Historical Trends

历史趋势分析

Use

period

for trend analysis:

Short-term:
```
7d
```
or
```
30d
```
Medium-term:
```
90d
```
or
```
180d
```
Long-term:
```
365d
```
Custom range:
```
start_date
```
/
```
end_date
```
(YYYY-MM-DD) overrides
```
period
```

Historical queries return daily data points with a

date

column.

使用

period

参数进行趋势分析：

短期:
```
7d
```
或
```
30d
```
中期:
```
90d
```
或
```
180d
```
长期:
```
365d
```
自定义区间:
```
start_date
```
/
```
end_date
```
（YYYY-MM-DD）会覆盖
```
period
```
参数

历史查询会返回包含

date

列的每日数据点。

Cross-Entity Analysis

跨实体分析

Compare across entity types using parallel tool calls:

"ETH price vs Ethereum TVL" ->

defillama:get_token_prices

defillama:get_chain_metrics

"Aave TVL vs AAVE token price" ->

defillama:get_protocol_metrics

defillama:get_token_prices

"Lending vs DEX category" -> two
```
defillama:get_category_metrics
```
calls in parallel

通过并行工具调用对比不同类型的实体：

"ETH价格 vs 以太坊TVL" ->

defillama:get_token_prices

defillama:get_chain_metrics

"Aave TVL vs AAVE代币价格" ->

defillama:get_protocol_metrics

defillama:get_token_prices

"借贷 vs DEX品类" -> 并行调用两次
```
defillama:get_category_metrics
```

Examples

示例

Example 1: User: "Most undervalued DeFi protocols by P/S ratio" Tool call:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(sort_by: "ps_ratio asc", limit: 20, metrics: ["tvl_base", "revenue_1d", "ps_ratio", "mcap"])

Example 2: User: "Which protocols grew TVL most in last 30 days?" Tool call:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(sort_by: "tvl_base_30d_pct_change desc", limit: 10, metrics: ["tvl_base", "tvl_base_30d_pct_change"])

Example 3: User: "Compare Aave and Compound fees" Tool call:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(protocol: ["aave", "compound-v3"], metrics: ["tvl_base", "fees_1d", "revenue_1d"])

Example 4: User: "Compare Lending vs DEX fees and TVL" Tool call:

defillama:get_category_metrics(category: ["Lending", "DEX"], metrics: ["tvl_base", "fees_1d", "revenue_1d"])

Example 5: User: "Aave TVL trend over 90 days" Tool call:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(protocol: "aave", metrics: ["tvl_base"], period: "90d")

Example 6: User: "Aave fees in Q1 2025" Tool call:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(protocol: "aave", metrics: ["fees_1d"], start_date: "2025-01-01", end_date: "2025-03-31")

示例1: 用户: "按P/S比率筛选被低估程度最高的DeFi协议" 工具调用:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(sort_by: "ps_ratio asc", limit: 20, metrics: ["tvl_base", "revenue_1d", "ps_ratio", "mcap"])

示例2: 用户: "过去30天TVL增长最快的协议有哪些？" 工具调用:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(sort_by: "tvl_base_30d_pct_change desc", limit: 10, metrics: ["tvl_base", "tvl_base_30d_pct_change"])

示例3: 用户: "对比Aave和Compound的手续费" 工具调用:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(protocol: ["aave", "compound-v3"], metrics: ["tvl_base", "fees_1d", "revenue_1d"])

示例4: 用户: "对比借贷和DEX品类的手续费与TVL" 工具调用:

defillama:get_category_metrics(category: ["Lending", "DEX"], metrics: ["tvl_base", "fees_1d", "revenue_1d"])

示例5: 用户: "Aave过去90天的TVL趋势" 工具调用:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(protocol: "aave", metrics: ["tvl_base"], period: "90d")

示例6: 用户: "Aave 2025年第一季度的手续费" 工具调用:

defillama:get_protocol_metrics(protocol: "aave", metrics: ["fees_1d"], start_date: "2025-01-01", end_date: "2025-03-31")