Back to Details

written-critique

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Written Critique

书面评审

Write feedback someone can act on without asking you to clarify.
撰写无需对方追问即可直接执行的反馈。

How to use

使用方法

  • /written-critique
    Apply structured critique format to design reviews in this conversation.
  • /written-critique
    在本次对话中应用结构化评审格式进行设计评审。

Constraints

约束条件

Critique Structure

评审结构

  1. Intent (2-3 sentences): What the design is trying to do. Not what it does. What experience it's trying to create.
  2. What works (2-3 specific decisions): Each with the principle behind it.
  3. What doesn't (1-2 specific decisions): Each with reasoning and the impact on the user.
  4. One change (1 recommendation): The single highest-impact change, framed as a direction not a prescription.
  1. 意图（2-3句话）：设计试图达成的目标，而非实际实现的功能。它想要营造怎样的用户体验。
  2. 可行之处（2-3个具体决策）：每个决策需说明背后的设计原则。
  3. 待改进之处（1-2个具体决策）：每个决策需说明理由及其对用户的影响。
  4. 一项改进建议（1条推荐）：影响最大的单一改进方向，以指引而非指令的方式表述。

Writing Rules

撰写规则

  • MUST be specific enough that the designer can act without a follow-up conversation
  • MUST separate craft feedback (alignment, consistency) from taste feedback (should this exist at all?)
  • MUST reference observable decisions, not feelings
  • SHOULD be under 300 words. Concise feedback gets read. Novels don't.
  • NEVER rewrite the design in the feedback. Diagnose, don't prescribe.
  • 必须足够具体，确保设计师无需后续沟通即可执行
  • 必须将工艺反馈（对齐、一致性）与审美反馈（是否应该存在）分开
  • 必须引用可观察的决策，而非主观感受
  • 建议控制在300字以内。简洁的反馈才会被阅读，冗长的内容则不会。
  • 切勿在反馈中重写设计方案。只诊断问题，不给出具体解决方案。

Anti-Patterns

反模式

  • Writing a wall of text with no structure
  • Mixing praise and criticism in the same sentence (pick a lane per observation)
  • Giving feedback on every detail equally (prioritize what matters most)
  • Being so diplomatic the feedback has no edge
  • 撰写无结构化的大段文字
  • 在同一句话中混合表扬与批评（每个观察点只聚焦一个方向）
  • 对所有细节给出同等权重的反馈（优先关注最重要的内容）
  • 过于委婉导致反馈没有实际价值