cw-simplify
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseSimplify
文本简化
Purpose
用途
Rewrite something complex in plainer, more accessible language without losing meaning.
将复杂内容改写为更浅显、更易理解的语言，同时不丢失原意。
Invocation
调用方式
- — Simplify the provided text
/cw-simplify [text] - — System asks "What section do you want me to simplify?"
/cw-simplify - Works on selection if provided, asks if not
- — 简化所提供的文本
/cw-simplify [文本] - — 系统会询问“你想让我简化哪部分内容？”
/cw-simplify - 若存在选中文本则直接处理选中文本，若无则向用户询问
How to Simplify
简化方法
-
Identify the core meaning — What is this actually saying?
-
Strip jargon — Replace technical terms with plain equivalents, or define them briefly on first use.
-
Shorten sentences — Break long, complex sentences into shorter ones.
-
Use concrete language — Swap abstractions for specific examples.
-
Front-load the point — Lead with the main idea, then explain.
-
Preserve precision — Don't oversimplify to the point of inaccuracy.
-
明确核心含义 — 这段内容实际要表达的是什么？
-
去除行话术语 — 用通俗的对应表达替换专业术语，或在首次出现时简要定义。
-
缩短句子长度 — 将冗长复杂的句子拆分为更短的句子。
-
使用具体语言 — 用具体例子替代抽象表述。
-
核心观点前置 — 先抛出主要观点，再进行解释说明。
-
保留内容准确性 — 不要因过度简化导致内容失真。
Output Format
输出格式
undefinedundefinedSimplified Version
Simplified Version
[The rewritten text]
What changed:
- [Brief note on key simplifications]
Does this capture it? Or did I lose something important?
undefined[The rewritten text]
What changed:
- [Brief note on key simplifications]
Does this capture it? Or did I lose something important?
undefinedPrinciples
原则
- Short words over long — "use" not "utilize," "help" not "facilitate"
- Active over passive — "We built" not "It was built by us"
- One idea per sentence — Break up compound ideas
- Concrete over abstract — "a 10% increase" not "significant growth"
- Reader-first — Write for someone encountering this idea for the first time
- 优先使用短词 — 例如用「use」而非「utilize」，用「help」而非「facilitate」
- 主动语态优于被动语态 — 例如用「We built」而非「It was built by us」
- 每句仅表达一个观点 — 拆分包含复合含义的句子
- 具体表述优于抽象表述 — 例如用「a 10% increase」而非「significant growth」
- 以读者为中心 — 为首次接触该观点的读者撰写内容
Simplification Moves
简化转换对照
| Complex Pattern | Simplified Version |
|---|---|
| Nominalization (the utilization of) | Verb form (using) |
| Passive voice (was implemented by) | Active voice (we implemented) |
| Jargon (synergize, leverage) | Plain verbs (combine, use) |
| Long sentence with multiple clauses | Multiple short sentences |
| Abstract noun (implementation) | Concrete action (we built) |
| Hedge words (somewhat, perhaps) | Direct statement or cut |
| 复杂模式 | 简化版本 |
|---|---|
| 名词化（the utilization of） | 动词形式（using） |
| 被动语态（was implemented by） | 主动语态（we implemented） |
| 行话术语（synergize, leverage） | 通俗动词（combine, use） |
| 包含多个从句的长句 | 多个短句 |
| 抽象名词（implementation） | 具体动作（we built） |
| 模糊限定词（somewhat, perhaps） | 直接表述或删除 |
What to Preserve
需保留的内容
- Technical accuracy
- Important nuance
- The writer's voice
- Necessary qualifications
- 技术准确性
- 重要的细微差别
- 作者的语气
- 必要的限定条件
Lessons
经验总结
[Skill-specific lessons will be added here as they're captured]
[该Skill的专属经验将在收集后补充于此]