research-ideation
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseResearch Ideation
研究构思
A goal-driven workflow for finding important research problems, designing novel solutions, and building deep field understanding through structured paper reading.
一个目标驱动的工作流,用于通过结构化论文阅读寻找重要研究问题、设计新颖解决方案并构建深度领域认知。
When to Use This Skill
何时使用此Skill
- User wants to find a research direction or brainstorm research ideas
- User needs to do a literature review or map a research field
- User asks about evaluating whether an idea is novel or worth pursuing
- User wants to read papers more effectively or build a systematic reading habit
- User mentions "research ideation", "find a problem", "literature tree", "novelty check", "paper reading"
- 用户希望寻找研究方向或头脑风暴研究创意
- 用户需要进行文献综述或绘制研究领域图谱
- 用户询问如何评估某个创意是否新颖或值得深入研究
- 用户希望更高效地阅读论文或建立系统性阅读习惯
- 用户提及“research ideation”、“寻找研究问题”、“literature tree”、“novelty check”、“论文阅读”
Goal-Driven Research Workflow
目标驱动的研究工作流
Follow these five steps in order. Each step builds on the previous one.
按顺序遵循以下五个步骤,每个步骤都建立在前一个步骤的基础上。
Step 1: Define a Long-Term Research Goal
步骤1:定义长期研究目标
Start with a goal that has both scientific and practical value. The goal should be ambitious enough to sustain multiple papers, but concrete enough to guide daily decisions.
Ask: "What is the ultimate form of this research direction? What would the world look like if this problem were fully solved?"
从一个兼具科学价值与实用价值的目标开始。该目标需足够宏大,能够支撑多篇论文的研究,同时又足够具体,可指导日常决策。
思考:“这个研究方向的最终形态是什么?如果该问题被完全解决,世界会变成什么样?”
Step 2: Build a Literature Tree
步骤2:构建文献树
Map the field by constructing two complementary trees:
- Novelty tree: Classify existing work by milestone tasks, representative pipelines, and novel modules. This reveals WHERE the field has gaps.
- Challenge-insight tree: Collect technical challenges and the insights/techniques that address them. This reveals WHICH problems lack good solutions.
See references/literature-tree.md for the full construction method and four types of novelty.
通过构建两棵互补的树来绘制领域图谱:
- 新颖性树:按里程碑任务、代表性流程和新颖模块对现有研究进行分类。这能揭示领域中存在哪些空白。
- 挑战洞见树:收集技术挑战以及解决这些挑战的洞见/技术。这能揭示哪些问题缺乏优质解决方案。
完整的构建方法及四种新颖性类型,请参阅references/literature-tree.md。
Step 3: Select a Problem
步骤3:选择研究问题
Find tasks with genuine research space. The key question: "Is this problem worth solving, or has a well-established solution already claimed this territory?"
Use the well-established solution check (4 levels) to decide whether to proceed or switch problems. Actively seek new failure cases rather than improving on known benchmarks.
See references/problem-selection.md for the full selection framework.
寻找具备真实研究空间的任务。核心问题:“这个问题是否值得解决,还是已有成熟解决方案占据了该领域?”
使用成熟解决方案核查(四个层级)来决定是否继续推进或更换问题。积极寻找新的失败案例,而非在已知基准上进行改进。
完整的选择框架,请参阅references/problem-selection.md。
Step 4: Design a Solution
步骤4:设计解决方案
Novel techniques are creative combinations of existing methods, not simple concatenations. Use two design patterns:
- Cross-domain transfer: Find papers in completely different domains that solve a technically similar problem, then adapt their solution.
- Problem decomposition: Break the problem into sub-problems, solve each via cross-domain transfer, then combine.
See references/solution-design.md for the full design methodology and knowledge distillation pipeline.
新颖技术是现有方法的创造性组合,而非简单拼接。使用两种设计模式:
- 跨领域迁移:寻找完全不同领域中解决技术相似问题的论文,然后适配其解决方案。
- 问题分解:将问题拆分为子问题,通过跨领域迁移解决每个子问题,再进行整合。
完整的设计方法及知识蒸馏流程,请参阅references/solution-design.md。
Step 5: Validate and Iterate
步骤5:验证与迭代
Run experiments on representative data. Use results to refine your understanding. If the approach fails, return to Step 3 or Step 4 with updated knowledge from the failure.
Output artifacts: Research direction summary (problem statement, proposed approach, novelty claim, key risks) — this becomes the input to or .
idea-tournamentpaper-planningSee the skill for systematic debugging when experiments don't work as expected.
experiment-craft在代表性数据上开展实验。利用实验结果深化认知。如果方法失败,结合失败带来的新认知返回步骤3或步骤4。
产出物:研究方向摘要(问题陈述、拟议方法、新颖性声明、关键风险)—— 这将作为或的输入。
idea-tournamentpaper-planning当实验未达到预期效果时,请使用 Skill进行系统性调试。
experiment-craftCounterintuitive Ideation Rules
反常识的构思规则
Prioritize these rules before regular ideation:
- Problem selection matters more than solution design: Choosing WHAT to solve has more impact than HOW you solve it. A great solution to an unimportant problem is still unimportant.
- Pursue new failure cases, not incremental improvements: Don't improve a technique on its original setting. Find new settings where it breaks — new failure cases on new data are contributions even if the technique itself isn't novel.
- If a well-established solution exists, switch problems: Solving an already-solved problem wastes time regardless of your angle. Improvement space is too small.
- Technology is creative combination, not concatenation: Novel techniques combine existing methods in non-obvious ways. Simple A-to-B pipelines are not contributions — if direct concatenation worked, the problem would have no technical challenge.
- When a breakthrough tool appears, apply it to YOUR roadmap: Don't improve the tool itself on its original benchmarks. Use it to solve YOUR milestone tasks — this produces high-impact work because you combine the tool's power with your domain expertise.
- A paper without real contribution wastes your time: Even if accepted, it doesn't advance the field or earn respect. Do work that genuinely moves the needle.
在常规构思前,请优先遵循以下规则:
- 问题选择比解决方案设计更重要:选择“解决什么”比“如何解决”的影响更大。针对不重要问题的优秀解决方案依然没有价值。
- 追求新的失败案例,而非增量改进:不要在技术的原始场景上进行改进。寻找该技术失效的新场景——即使技术本身不新颖,新数据上的新失败案例也属于研究贡献。
- 若已有成熟解决方案,更换问题:解决已被解决的问题只会浪费时间,无论你的切入角度如何。改进空间极小。
- 技术是创造性组合,而非简单拼接:新颖技术以非显而易见的方式组合现有方法。简单的A到B流程不属于研究贡献——如果直接拼接就能奏效,该问题就不存在技术挑战。
- 当突破性工具出现时,将其应用到你的研究路线图中:不要在该工具的原始基准上改进工具本身。用它来解决你的里程碑任务——这会产出高影响力的研究,因为你将工具的能力与你的领域专业知识相结合。
- 无真实贡献的论文只会浪费你的时间:即使论文被录用,也无法推动领域发展或赢得认可。请做真正能推动领域进步的工作。
Structured Paper Reading
结构化论文阅读
Turn reading into structured Q&A using a paper parsing tree. Three levels of depth:
| Level | Goal | What You Can Do After |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Technical | Understand all details and terminology | Reproduce the method; explain each component |
| 2. Analytical | Know what problem it solves and why this approach | Explain the paper's motivation and design choices |
| 3. Contextual | Know its position in the literature tree | Update your field map; generate new research questions |
Write a structured summary for every paper you read. Use the template at assets/paper-summary-template.md.
See references/paper-reading.md for the full reading methodology and habit-building guidance.
利用论文解析树将阅读转化为结构化问答。三个深度层级:
| 层级 | 目标 | 完成后可开展的工作 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. 技术层 | 理解所有细节与术语 | 复现该方法;解释每个组件 |
| 2. 分析层 | 了解论文解决的问题及该方法的设计原因 | 解释论文的动机与设计选择 |
| 3. 语境层 | 了解论文在文献树中的位置 | 更新你的领域图谱;生成新的研究问题 |
为每篇阅读的论文撰写结构化摘要。请使用assets/paper-summary-template.md中的模板。
完整的阅读方法及习惯养成指导,请参阅references/paper-reading.md。
Handoff to Idea Tournament or Planning
转交至Idea Tournament或论文规划
When you have a research direction but want to explore multiple concrete approaches, pass to for tree-structured generation and Elo ranking before planning.
idea-tournamentWhen ideation is complete — you have a problem, a proposed solution approach, and supporting literature — pass these artifacts to :
paper-planning| Artifact | Source Step | Used By |
|---|---|---|
| Research goal and scope | Step 1 | Story design (task definition) |
| Literature tree (novelty + challenge-insight) | Step 2 | Related work mapping, novelty claims |
| Problem statement and motivation | Step 3 | Introduction motivation paragraphs |
| Solution sketch and design rationale | Step 4 | Method section planning |
| Key failure cases to address | Step 3 | Experiment planning (stress tests) |
| Relevant prior work and their limitations | Step 2 | Baseline selection, comparison design |
当你已有研究方向但希望探索多种具体方法时,可将其转交至进行树状生成和Elo排名,之后再进行规划。
idea-tournament当构思完成后——你已确定问题、拟议解决方案及相关文献——将这些产出物转交至:
paper-planning| 产出物 | 来源步骤 | 使用方 |
|---|---|---|
| 研究目标与范围 | 步骤1 | 故事设计(任务定义) |
| 文献树(新颖性+挑战洞见) | 步骤2 | 相关工作图谱、新颖性声明 |
| 问题陈述与动机 | 步骤3 | 引言动机段落 |
| 解决方案草图与设计依据 | 步骤4 | 方法部分规划 |
| 需要解决的关键失败案例 | 步骤3 | 实验规划(压力测试) |
| 相关前人工作及其局限性 | 步骤2 | 基线选择、对比设计 |
Reference Navigation
参考资料导航
| Topic | Reference File | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Literature tree construction | literature-tree.md | Mapping a research field |
| Problem selection | problem-selection.md | Evaluating whether a problem is worth solving |
| Solution design | solution-design.md | Designing a novel approach |
| Paper reading methodology | paper-reading.md | Reading papers effectively |
| Paper summary template | paper-summary-template.md | Writing structured paper notes |
| 主题 | 参考文件 | 适用场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 文献树构建 | literature-tree.md | 绘制研究领域图谱 |
| 研究问题选择 | problem-selection.md | 评估问题是否值得解决 |
| 解决方案设计 | solution-design.md | 设计新颖方法 |
| 论文阅读方法 | paper-reading.md | 高效阅读论文 |
| 论文摘要模板 | paper-summary-template.md | 撰写结构化论文笔记 |