Back to Details

battle-plan

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Battle Plan

作战计划

Transforms a clarified goal into a comprehensive action plan that strengthens your case AND navigates the people who need to approve it.
将明确后的目标转化为一份全面的行动计划，既能强化你的提案说服力，又能妥善应对需要批准该提案的相关人员。

Core Principle

核心原则

Substance and politics are intertwined. A brilliant proposal fails without political navigation. Political skill fails without a defensible proposal. This skill addresses both.
内容与人际政治密不可分。 一份出色的提案若缺乏人际层面的推进技巧也会失败；反之，仅有人际技巧而没有站得住脚的提案也无济于事。本技能同时兼顾这两个层面。

Before Starting

开始之前

First Question: Document Depth

第一个问题：文档深度

Do you want fast or thorough document review?
A) Fast - use doc-summary/ (smaller files, quicker responses)
B) Thorough - use docs/ (full documents, more context)
C) Skip documents - just work from what I tell you
你需要快速还是详尽的文档审阅？
A) 快速 - 使用 doc-summary/（适用于较小文件，响应更快）
B) 详尽 - 使用 docs/（适用于完整文件，上下文更丰富）
C) 跳过文档 - 仅基于我告知你的信息开展工作

Then:

接下来：

  1. Read project docs - Check chosen folder for clarify-*.md files and other context
  2. If no clarification exists, ask: "I don't see a clarification document. Want to run /clarify first, or should I work with what you tell me now?"
  3. Summarize understanding before generating plan: "Based on what I've read, here's what I understand..." and confirm with user
  1. 阅读项目文档 - 查看所选文件夹中的clarify-*.md文件及其他相关上下文
  2. 若不存在澄清文档，询问：“我未找到澄清文档。你想先运行/clarify，还是基于你现在告知我的信息开展工作？”
  3. 生成计划前总结理解：“基于我所阅读的内容，我的理解是……”并与用户确认

The Battle Plan Structure

作战计划结构

1. ASSESS - Where do you stand?

1. 评估 - 你的现状如何？

Substance Assessment

内容评估

  • What's the core proposal?
  • What evidence exists today?
  • What are the gaps and weaknesses?
  • What questions can't be answered yet?
  • What would a skeptic attack?
  • 核心提案是什么？
  • 目前有哪些证据支持？
  • 存在哪些空白和薄弱环节？
  • 哪些问题目前还无法解答？
  • 持怀疑态度的人会攻击哪些点？

Political Assessment

人际政治评估

  • Who decides?
  • Who influences the decision?
  • Where does each person stand today?
  • What are the key relationships and dynamics?
  • 谁拥有决策权？
  • 谁能影响决策？
  • 每个人当前的立场是什么？
  • 关键关系和动态有哪些？

Gap Analysis

差距分析

  • Substance gaps: What's missing from the proposal itself?
  • Evidence gaps: What proof points are needed?
  • Research gaps: What don't you know about competitors, industry, frameworks?
  • Political gaps: Which relationships need work?
  • 内容差距：提案本身缺少什么？
  • 证据差距：需要哪些证明点？
  • 调研差距：关于竞争对手、行业、框架，你还有哪些未知信息？
  • 人际政治差距：哪些关系需要改善？

2. STRENGTHEN - Build a defensible case

2. 强化 - 构建站得住脚的提案

Research Tasks

调研任务

Not just "gather info" but specific research with clear purpose:
  • Competitive intel: What are competitors doing? How behind/ahead are we?
  • Industry precedents: Who's done this well? What can we learn?
  • Frameworks and experts: What do credible external sources say?
  • Internal evidence: What data exists internally that supports the case?
  • Failure analysis: What's failed before and why? How is this different?
不只是“收集信息”，而是具有明确目标的具体调研：
  • 竞品情报：竞争对手在做什么？我们与他们的差距有多大？
  • 行业先例：哪些企业在这方面做得很好？我们可以借鉴什么？
  • 框架与专家意见：可信的外部来源有哪些观点？
  • 内部证据：内部有哪些数据可以支持提案？
  • 失败案例分析：之前哪些尝试失败了？原因是什么？本次提案与之前有何不同？

Proposal Improvements

提案优化

Based on gaps and weaknesses identified:
  • Success metrics that are specific and measurable
  • ROI framework or value articulation
  • Risk mitigation that addresses real concerns
  • Implementation clarity - how this actually works
  • Answers to the questions opponents will ask
基于已识别的差距和薄弱环节：
  • 具体且可衡量的成功指标
  • ROI框架或价值阐述
  • 针对实际顾虑的风险缓解方案
  • 实施细节说明——提案具体如何落地
  • 对反对者可能提出的问题的解答

Documents to Create (Substance)

需要创建的文档（内容层面）

  • Strengthened proposal/plan
  • Evidence summary or proof points document
  • Research findings synthesis
  • FAQ or objection responses
  • 优化后的提案/计划
  • 证据汇总或证明点文档
  • 调研发现综合报告
  • 常见问题或反对意见应答文档

3. BUILD SUPPORT - Navigate the people

3. 建立支持 - 妥善应对相关人员

Political Groundwork

人际政治基础工作

For each key person:
  • Current stance assessment
  • What they need to see/hear/believe
  • Who influences them
  • Best approach (1:1, group, formal, informal)
  • Specific messaging for their concerns
  • What would make them a champion vs. just not blocking
针对每位关键人物：
  • 当前立场评估
  • 他们需要看到/听到/相信什么？
  • 谁能影响他们？
  • 最佳沟通方式（一对一、小组、正式、非正式）
  • 针对他们顾虑的具体沟通话术
  • 如何让他们从单纯不反对转变为积极支持

Relationship Moves

关系推进行动

  • Pre-conversations before formal asks
  • Coalition building with supporters
  • Neutralizing blockers
  • Finding unexpected allies
  • 正式提出请求前的预沟通
  • 与支持者建立联盟
  • 化解反对者的阻力
  • 寻找意想不到的盟友

Documents to Create (Politics)

需要创建的文档（人际政治层面）

  • Tailored summaries for different audiences
  • Talking points for champions to use
  • Materials that let supporters advocate for you
  • 针对不同受众的定制化摘要
  • 供支持者使用的沟通要点
  • 便于支持者为你发声的材料

4. EXECUTE - Sequenced actions

4. 执行 - 按顺序推进行动

Sequence Logic

顺序逻辑

The order matters. Consider:
  • What research must complete before certain conversations?
  • Which people need to be won over before approaching others?
  • What documents need to exist before key meetings?
  • Where are the dependencies?
行动顺序至关重要。需考虑：
  • 哪些调研必须在某些沟通前完成？
  • 哪些人需要在接触其他人之前先争取到支持？
  • 哪些文档必须在关键会议前准备好？
  • 存在哪些依赖关系？

Interleaved Actions

交叉推进行动

Don't separate "do all research, then do all politics." Interleave:
  • Research finding → informs → conversation with skeptic
  • Conversation with ally → reveals → new research need
  • Proposal revision → enables → executive meeting
不要将“完成所有调研，再开展所有人际工作”分开进行。应交叉推进：
  • 调研发现 → 指导 → 与怀疑者的沟通
  • 与盟友的沟通 → 揭示 → 新的调研需求
  • 提案修订 → 促成 → 高管会议

5. CHECKPOINTS - How you know it's working

5. 检查点 - 如何判断计划有效

  • Evidence that substance is getting stronger
  • Evidence that political support is building
  • Warning signs that require course correction
  • Decision points where you might pivot
  • 内容层面说服力增强的证据
  • 人际政治层面支持度提升的证据
  • 需要调整方向的预警信号
  • 可能需要转向的决策点

Output Format

输出格式

Save to 
docs/battle-plan-[topic]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md
markdown
undefined
保存至 
docs/battle-plan-[topic]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md
markdown
undefined

Battle Plan: [Goal]

作战计划：[目标]

Generated: [date] Based on: [link to clarify doc if exists]
生成日期：[日期] 基于：[关联澄清文档的链接（若存在）]

Situation Summary

现状总结

[3-4 paragraph summary covering:
  • The goal and why it matters
  • Current strength of the case (substance)
  • Current political landscape
  • What needs to happen]
[3-4段总结，涵盖：
  • 目标及其重要性
  • 当前提案的内容层面优势
  • 当前的人际政治格局
  • 需要完成的事项]

Assessment

评估

Substance: Current State

内容层面：当前状态

  • Core proposal: [what you're actually proposing]
  • Evidence you have: [what supports the case today]
  • Key weaknesses: [what opponents will attack]
  • Unanswered questions: [what you can't defend yet]
  • 核心提案：[你实际提出的内容]
  • 现有证据：[当前支持提案的依据]
  • 主要薄弱环节：[反对者会攻击的点]
  • 未解答的问题：[你目前无法辩护的点]

Politics: Current State

人际政治层面：当前状态

  • Decision maker(s): [who approves]
  • Current alignment: [who's supportive, skeptical, blocking]
  • Key dynamics: [relationships, tensions, opportunities]
  • 决策者：[拥有批准权的人]
  • 当前立场：[谁支持、谁持怀疑态度、谁反对]
  • 关键动态：[关系、紧张点、机会]

Gap Analysis

差距分析

Gap TypeWhat's MissingWhy It Matters
Evidence[specific gap][consequence if not filled]
Research[specific gap][consequence if not filled]
Proposal[specific gap][consequence if not filled]
Political[specific gap][consequence if not filled]
差距类型缺失内容重要性
证据[具体差距][若不填补的后果]
调研[具体差距][若不填补的后果]
提案[具体差距][若不填补的后果]
人际政治[具体差距][若不填补的后果]

The Plan

行动计划

Note: This document serves as your action checklist. Leave it in project docs to help the LLM track progress and assist with execution.
注意： 本文件可作为你的行动清单。将其保存在项目文档中，以帮助LLM跟踪进度并协助执行。

Phase 1: Strengthen the Case

第一阶段：强化提案

Research to Conduct:
  • [Specific research task]
    • Purpose: [why this matters]
    • Source: [where to look]
    • Output: [what you'll have when done]
  • [Specific research task]
    • Purpose: [why this matters]
    • Source: [where to look]
    • Output: [what you'll have when done]
Proposal Improvements:
  • [Specific improvement to make]
    • Addresses: [which weakness or gap]
    • Deliverable: [what this produces]
  • [Specific improvement to make]
    • Addresses: [which weakness or gap]
    • Deliverable: [what this produces]
Documents to Create:
  • [Document name/type]
    • Purpose: [what it accomplishes]
    • Audience: [who it's for]
    • Key content: [what it must include]
需开展的调研：
  • [具体调研任务]
    • 目的：[为何重要]
    • 来源：[调研渠道]
    • 输出：[完成后产出的成果]
  • [具体调研任务]
    • 目的：[为何重要]
    • 来源：[调研渠道]
    • 输出：[完成后产出의成果]
提案优化：
  • [具体优化措施]
    • 解决：[对应的薄弱环节或差距]
    • 交付物：[产出成果]
  • [具体优化措施]
    • 解决：[对应的薄弱环节或差距]
    • 交付物：[产出成果]
需创建的文档：
  • [文档名称/类型]
    • 目的：[要达成的目标]
    • 受众：[面向人群]
    • 核心内容：[必须包含的内容]

Phase 2: Build Political Support

第二阶段：建立人际支持

Pre-Conversations: Before any formal ask, prepare the ground:
预沟通： 在正式提出请求前，做好铺垫：

[Person 1] - [Current stance]

[人物1] - [当前立场]

  • Approach: [how to engage - 1:1, setting, framing]
  • Key message: [what they need to hear]
  • Evidence to share: [which proof points matter to them]
  • Ask: [what you want from this conversation]
  • Success looks like: [how you'll know it worked]
  • 沟通方式：[参与方式 - 一对一、场景、框架]
  • 核心信息：[他们需要听到的内容]
  • 需分享的证据：[对他们重要的证明点]
  • 请求事项：[你想从本次沟通中获得什么]
  • 成功标志：[如何判断沟通有效]

[Person 2] - [Current stance]

[人物2] - [当前立场]

[Same structure]
Coalition Building:
  • [Action to build support network]
  • [Action to arm champions with materials]
[相同结构]
联盟构建：
  • [建立支持网络的行动]
  • [为支持者提供材料的行动]

Phase 3: Execute

第三阶段：执行

Sequenced Actions:
OrderActionDepends OnEnables
1[Action]-[what this unlocks]
2[Action]Step 1[what this unlocks]
3[Action]Steps 1-2[what this unlocks]
............
Detailed Sequence:
  1. [Action]
    • Why now: [reasoning]
    • Deliverable: [what this produces]
    • Next step it enables: [what follows]
  2. [Action]
    • Depends on: [previous step]
    • Deliverable: [what this produces]
    • Next step it enables: [what follows]
[Continue as needed]
按顺序推进的行动：
顺序行动依赖项促成事项
1[行动]-[该行动解锁的事项]
2[行动]步骤1[该行动解锁的事项]
3[行动]步骤1-2[该行动解锁的事项]
............
详细执行顺序：
  1. [行动]
    • 为何此时执行：[理由]
    • 交付物：[产出成果]
    • 促成的下一步：[后续事项]
  2. [行动]
    • 依赖项：[前置步骤]
    • 交付物：[产出成果]
    • 促成的下一步：[后续事项]
[按需继续]

Objections & Responses

反对意见与应答

Likely ObjectionFrom WhomUnderlying ConcernEvidence/Response
[What they'll say][Name][Real issue][How to address - include specific evidence]
[What they'll say][Name][Real issue][How to address - include specific evidence]
可能的反对意见提出者潜在顾虑证据/应答
[他们会提出的观点][姓名][实际问题][如何应对 - 包含具体证据]
[他们会提出的观点][姓名][实际问题][如何应对 - 包含具体证据]

Checkpoints

检查点

Substance Checkpoints:
  • [Evidence that case is getting stronger]
  • [Research completed that fills key gap]
  • [Proposal improvement that addresses weakness]
Political Checkpoints:
  • [Signal that key person is moving toward support]
  • [Coalition milestone]
  • [Blocker neutralized or converted]
Warning Signs:
  • [Sign that something is going wrong]
  • [Sign that approach needs to change]
内容层面检查点：
  • [提案说服力增强的证据]
  • [填补关键差距的调研已完成]
  • [解决薄弱环节的提案优化已完成]
人际政治层面检查点：
  • [关键人物转向支持的信号]
  • [联盟构建的里程碑]
  • [反对者的阻力已化解或已争取其支持]
预警信号：
  • [表明出现问题的信号]
  • [表明需要调整方式的信号]

Risks & Contingencies

风险与应对方案

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation
[What could go wrong]H/M/LH/M/L[What to do]
风险可能性影响应对措施
[可能出现的问题]高/中/低高/中/低[应对方法]

Immediate Next Actions

立即执行的下一步行动

Do these first:
  1. [Specific action with clear output] - [why first]
  2. [Specific action with clear output] - [why second]
  3. [Specific action with clear output] - [why third]
undefined
首先完成以下事项：
  1. [具有明确输出的具体行动] - [为何优先执行]
  2. [具有明确输出的具体行动] - [为何其次执行]
  3. [具有明确输出的具体行动] - [为何第三执行]
undefined

After Completion

完成之后

Ask: "Want me to help execute any of these items? I can help with:
  • Research (competitive intel, industry precedents, frameworks)
  • Drafting documents (proposals, summaries, talking points)
  • Preparing for specific conversations
  • Strengthening specific parts of the case"
询问：“需要我协助执行这些事项中的任何一项吗？我可以提供以下帮助：
  • 调研（竞品情报、行业先例、框架）
  • 文档撰写（提案、摘要、沟通要点）
  • 特定沟通的准备工作
  • 强化提案的特定部分”