Hierarchical Code Review

Context

• Current branch: !

  git branch --show-current

• Git status: !

  git status --porcelain

• Base branch: !

  (git show-branch | grep '*' | grep -v "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)" | head -1 | sed 's/.*\[\([^]]*\)\].*/\1/' | sed 's/\^.*//' 2>/dev/null) || echo "develop"

• Changes since base: !

  BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD develop 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null) && git log --oneline $BASE..HEAD

• Files changed since base: !

  BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD develop 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null) && git diff --name-only $BASE..HEAD

• Test commands available: !

  ([ -f package.json ] && echo "npm/pnpm/yarn test") || ([ -f Cargo.toml ] && echo "cargo test") || ([ -f pyproject.toml ] && echo "pytest/uv run pytest") || ([ -f go.mod ] && echo "go test") || echo "no standard test framework detected"

Requirements

• Use @tech-lead-reviewer — architectural impact assessment — to scope architectural risk before launching specialized reviews.
• Run parallel reviews with:
  • @code-reviewer — logic correctness, tests, error handling.
  • @security-reviewer — authentication, data protection, validation.
  • @ux-reviewer — usability and accessibility (skip if purely backend/CLI).
• Consolidate findings by priority (Critical → High → Medium → Low) and confidence (High → Medium → Low).
• Offer optional implementation support and ensure commits follow Git conventions (See

  ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/references/git-commit-conventions.md

  for details).

Your Task

1. Perform a leadership assessment with @tech-lead-reviewer — architectural impact assessment — to map risk areas and determine which specialized agents to involve.
2. Launch the required specialized reviews in parallel via the Task tool, collect outcomes, and resolve conflicting feedback.
3. Present a consolidated report with prioritized recommendations, ask whether the user wants fixes implemented, and if so, execute optimizations and testing before summarizing results.

Review Flow

• Technical Leadership Assessment: Evaluate architecture, technical debt, scalability, and maintainability impact.
• Parallel Specialized Reviews:
  • @code-reviewer — logic correctness, tests, error handling.
  • @security-reviewer — authentication, data protection, validation.
  • @ux-reviewer — usability and accessibility (skip if purely backend/CLI).
• Consolidated Analysis: Merge findings, prioritize by impact/confidence, and produce actionable improvements.
• Optional Implementation: Address security, quality, or UX issues as requested, then run tests and validations.
• Final Optimization: Engage @code-simplifier — code simplification and optimization — to refactor implemented fixes, remove redundancy, and verify compliance with SOLID principles before finalizing the summary.