paseo-advisor
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChinesePaseo Advisor
Paseo 顾问
Single agent. Reads the situation you're in. Gives a judgment. You decide what to do — the advisor doesn't drive the work.
User's request: $ARGUMENTS
单个Agent。了解你当前的处境,给出判断。由你决定后续行动——顾问不会主导工作。
用户请求: $ARGUMENTS
Prerequisites
前提条件
Read the paseo skill — provider for the advisor comes from orchestration preferences unless the user names one.
阅读paseo技能——顾问的提供者默认来自编排偏好,除非用户指定具体提供者。
Picking the advisor
选择顾问
- User named one () → use it.
--provider claude/opus - Otherwise resolve from preferences — pick the category that matches the question:
- Design / approach question →
planning - "Did I miss something" review →
audit - "Is this even right" →
research
- Design / approach question →
- Contrast helps. If your own provider matches what preferences would pick, swap to a different family on purpose — fresh perspective is the point.
- 用户指定提供者()→ 使用该提供者。
--provider claude/opus - 否则根据偏好确定——选择与问题匹配的类别:
- 设计/方法类问题 →
planning - “我有没有遗漏什么”类审查 →
audit - “这是否正确”类问题 →
research
- 设计/方法类问题 →
- 对比更有帮助。如果你自己使用的提供者与偏好选择的一致,刻意切换到不同系列的提供者——核心是获得全新视角。
The briefing
简报内容
The advisor has zero context. Make it self-contained:
- The question, sharply.
- What you've considered and what you've ruled out.
- Relevant files by path (don't paste — let the agent read).
- Explicit ask: "give me a recommendation, with reasoning."
End with the no-edits suffix:
This is analysis only. Do NOT edit, create, or delete any files. Do NOT write code.顾问没有任何上下文信息,因此简报需独立完整:
- 明确清晰的问题。
- 你已考虑的内容和已排除的选项。
- 相关文件的路径(不要粘贴内容——让Agent自行读取)。
- 明确要求:“给出建议并附上理由。”
结尾添加不可编辑后缀:
This is analysis only. Do NOT edit, create, or delete any files. Do NOT write code.Launch and synthesize
启动与总结
Create the advisor agent via Paseo with a title and the briefing as the initial prompt. Wait for it to finish. Read its response. Synthesize for the user — the advisor's verdict + your recommendation.
[Advisor] <topic>通过Paseo创建顾问Agent,标题为,并将简报作为初始提示词。等待其完成响应。阅读回复后,为用户总结——包括顾问的结论和你的建议。
[Advisor] <topic>Persistent advisor
持久化顾问
If the user wants ongoing input ("keep this advisor for the next few decisions"), don't archive after the first reply. Send follow-ups when you need another take. Archive when the user says they're done, or when the topic shifts and a fresh context would serve better.
如果用户需要持续输入(“让这个顾问参与后续的决策”),首次回复后不要归档该Agent。当需要再次获取意见时发送跟进请求。当用户表示完成,或主题发生变化需要全新上下文时,再进行归档。