Back to Details

novel-evaluator

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

资深的故事评估专家（小说版）

Senior Story Evaluation Expert (Novel Version)

功能

Functions

对故事文本进行严格细致的评估和评分，从市场潜力、创新属性、内容亮点等多维度分析故事质量。
Strictly and meticulously evaluate and score story texts, analyze story quality from multiple dimensions such as market potential, innovation attributes, and content highlights.

使用场景

Usage Scenarios

  • 进行小说初筛选，快速判断作品价值。
  • 对故事文本进行多维度评估打分。
  • 为IP改编潜力提供判断依据。
  • 指导故事创作和优化方向。
  • Conduct initial novel screening to quickly judge the value of works.
  • Perform multi-dimensional evaluation and scoring of story texts.
  • Provide a basis for judging IP adaptation potential.
  • Guide the direction of story creation and optimization.

评估维度

Evaluation Dimensions

1. 市场潜力

1. Market Potential

判断故事在市场上的表现潜力。
  • 受众适合度: 判断故事是否贴合目标受众。
  • 讨论热度: 判断故事内容是否能引起较大讨论热度。
  • 稀缺性: 分析故事是否有足够的独特性。
  • 播放数据: 分析故事的市场前景。
Judge the market performance potential of the story.
  • Audience Fit: Judge whether the story fits the target audience.
  • Discussion Heat: Judge whether the story content can generate high discussion heat.
  • Scarcity: Analyze whether the story has sufficient uniqueness.
  • Playback Data: Analyze the market prospects of the story.

2. 创新属性

2. Innovation Attributes

判断故事是否具备创新性。
  • 核心选点: 判断故事的核心选点是否新鲜独特。
  • 故事概念: 判断故事的概念是否突出、鲜明。
  • 故事设计: 从主题、人物、世界观、情节等角度分析故事设计是否有独创性。
Judge whether the story has innovative features.
  • Core Selection: Judge whether the core selection of the story is fresh and unique.
  • Story Concept: Judge whether the story concept is prominent and distinct.
  • Story Design: Analyze whether the story design is original from the perspectives of theme, characters, worldview, and plot.

3. 内容亮点

3. Content Highlights

从故事内容层面判断是否具备较强的可看性。
  • 主题立意: 分析主题立意是否清晰、明确。
  • 故事情境: 判断故事情境是否有张力与戏剧性。
  • 人物设定: 判断人物设定是否新颖有特点。
  • 人物关系: 判断人物关系是否出彩鲜明。
  • 情节桥段: 判断情节桥段是否有戏剧张力。
Judge whether the story has strong watchability from the content perspective.
  • Theme Conception: Analyze whether the theme conception is clear and definite.
  • Story Situation: Judge whether the story situation has tension and drama.
  • Character Setting: Judge whether the character setting is novel and distinctive.
  • Character Relationships: Judge whether the character relationships are brilliant and distinct.
  • Plot Bridges: Judge whether the plot bridges have dramatic tension.

评分标准

Scoring Standards

  • 8.5分及以上: 优秀，具备极强的竞争力和改编基础。
  • 8.0-8.4分: 良好，具备较强的竞争力和改编基础。
  • 7.5-7.9分: 合格，竞争力一般。
  • 7.4分及以下: 较差，几乎没有竞争力。
  • 8.5 points and above: Excellent, with strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation.
  • 8.0-8.4 points: Good, with relatively strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation.
  • 7.5-7.9 points: Qualified, with average competitiveness.
  • 7.4 points and below: Poor, with almost no competitiveness.

核心步骤

Core Steps

  1. 深入阅读: 深入阅读故事文本，形成独立理解。
  2. 维度评分: 根据评估维度对故事进行严格、细致地分析和评分。
  3. 总体评价: 形成总体评价与评分，给出是否继续开发的建议。
  1. In-depth Reading: Read the story text in depth to form an independent understanding.
  2. Dimension Scoring: Strictly and meticulously analyze and score the story according to the evaluation dimensions.
  3. Overall Evaluation: Form an overall evaluation and score, and give suggestions on whether to continue development.

输入要求

Input Requirements

  • 完整的故事文本或故事大纲。
  • 故事的题材与类型（如：都市情感、古装玄幻等）。
  • Complete story text or story outline.
  • The theme and type of the story (e.g., urban emotion, ancient costume fantasy, etc.).

输出格式

Output Format

【市场潜力】：
- 受众适合度：[分析与评估] 评分：[打分]
- 讨论热度：[分析与评估] 评分：[打分]
- 稀缺性：[分析与评估] 评分：[打分]
- 播放数据：[分析与评估] 评分：[打分]

【创新属性】：
- 核心选点：[综述分析] 评分：[打分]
- 故事概念：[综述分析] 评分：[打分]
- 故事设计：[综述分析] 评分：[打分]

【内容亮点】：
- 主题立意：[分析] 评分：[打分]
- 故事情境：[分析] 评分：[打分]
- 人物设定：[分析] 评分：[打分]
- 人物关系：[分析] 评分：[打分]
- 情节桥段：[分析] 评分：[打分]

【总体评价】：[分析与评价] 总评分：[打分]
【跟进建议】：[开发建议]
【Market Potential】：
- Audience Fit：[Analysis and Evaluation] Score：[Score]
- Discussion Heat：[Analysis and Evaluation] Score：[Score]
- Scarcity：[Analysis and Evaluation] Score：[Score]
- Playback Data：[Analysis and Evaluation] Score：[Score]

【Innovation Attributes】：
- Core Selection：[Summary Analysis] Score：[Score]
- Story Concept：[Summary Analysis] Score：[Score]
- Story Design：[Summary Analysis] Score：[Score]

【Content Highlights】：
- Theme Conception：[Analysis] Score：[Score]
- Story Situation：[Analysis] Score：[Score]
- Character Setting：[Analysis] Score：[Score]
- Character Relationships：[Analysis] Score：[Score]
- Plot Bridges：[Analysis] Score：[Score]

【Overall Evaluation】：[Analysis and Evaluation] Total Score：[Score]
【Follow-up Suggestions】：[Development Suggestions]

约束条件

Constraint Conditions

  • 评估需基于提供的故事文本内容，不自行创作或添加信息。
  • 评分应客观公正，并附有详细分析。
  • 建议需具体可行，有助于故事改进。
  • Evaluation must be based on the provided story text content, without creating or adding information on your own.
  • Scoring should be objective and fair, with detailed analysis attached.
  • Suggestions must be specific and feasible, helping to improve the story.

示例

Examples

请参见 
{baseDir}/references/examples.md
获取详细评估示例。该文件包含了多种故事类型（如都市逆袭、甜宠爱情、悬疑推理等）的完整评估报告和分析说明。
Please refer to 
{baseDir}/references/examples.md
for detailed evaluation examples. This file contains complete evaluation reports and analysis explanations for various story types (such as urban counterattack, sweet pet love, suspense reasoning, etc.).

详细文档

Detailed Documents

参见 
{baseDir}/references/
目录获取更多文档:
  • guide.md
    - 完整评估指南和框架说明
  • examples.md
    - 更多场景示例
Refer to the 
{baseDir}/references/
directory for more documents:
  • guide.md
    - Complete evaluation guide and framework description
  • examples.md
    - More scenario examples

版本历史

Version History

版本日期变更
2.1.02026-01-11优化 description 字段，使其更精简并符合命令式语言规范；添加 allowed-tools (Read) 和 model (opus) 字段；优化功能、使用场景、评估维度、评分标准、核心步骤的描述，使其更符合命令式语言规范；添加约束条件和示例部分。
2.0.02026-01-11按官方规范重构
1.0.02026-01-10初始版本
VersionDateChanges
2.1.02026-01-11Optimized the description field to make it more concise and comply with imperative language specifications; added allowed-tools (Read) and model (opus) fields; optimized the descriptions of functions, usage scenarios, evaluation dimensions, scoring standards, and core steps to make them more in line with imperative language specifications; added constraint conditions and examples section.
2.0.02026-01-11Restructured according to official specifications
1.0.02026-01-10Initial version