Back to Details

story-outline-evaluator

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

故事大纲评估专家

Story Outline Evaluation Expert

功能

Features

深入评估故事大纲，从市场潜力、创新属性、内容亮点等多维度进行判断和评分。
Conduct in-depth evaluation of story outlines, make judgments and scores from multiple dimensions such as market potential, innovation attributes, and content highlights.

使用场景

Application Scenarios

  • 评估故事大纲质量。
  • 判断IP改编潜力。
  • 作为项目立项决策参考。
  • 指导故事优化方向。
  • Evaluate the quality of story outlines.
  • Judge the potential of IP adaptation.
  • Serve as a reference for project approval decisions.
  • Guide the direction of story optimization.

评估维度

Evaluation Dimensions

1. 市场潜力

1. Market Potential

结合市场，判断故事大纲的市场表现潜力。
  • 受众适合度: 判断故事是否贴合目标受众。
  • 讨论热度: 判断故事内容是否能引起大众共鸣。
  • 稀缺性: 分析故事是否有足够的独特性。
  • 播放数据: 分析故事的市场前景。
Combine market conditions to judge the market performance potential of the story outline.
  • Audience Fit: Judge whether the story fits the target audience.
  • Discussion Heat: Judge whether the story content can resonate with the public.
  • Scarcity: Analyze whether the story has sufficient uniqueness.
  • Playback Data Potential: Analyze the market prospects of the story.

2. 创新属性

2. Innovation Attributes

判断故事大纲是否具备创新性。
  • 核心选点: 判断故事的核心选点是否新鲜独特。
  • 故事概念: 判断故事的概念是否突出、鲜明。
  • 故事设计: 从主题、人物、世界观、情节等角度分析。
Judge whether the story outline has innovation.
  • Core Theme Selection: Judge whether the core theme of the story is fresh and unique.
  • Story Concept: Judge whether the story concept is prominent and distinct.
  • Story Design: Analyze from the perspectives of theme, characters, worldview, plot, etc.

3. 内容亮点

3. Content Highlights

从故事内容层面判断是否具备较强的可看性。
  • 主题立意: 分析主题立意是否清晰明确。
  • 故事情境: 判断故事情境是否有张力和戏剧性。
  • 人物设定: 判断主要人物设定是否新颖有特点。
  • 人物关系: 判断主要人物关系是否出彩鲜明。
  • 情节桥段: 判断情节桥段是否有戏剧张力。
Judge whether the story has strong watchability from the content perspective.
  • Theme Conception: Analyze whether the theme conception is clear and definite.
  • Story Context: Judge whether the story context has tension and dramatic conflict.
  • Character Settings: Judge whether the main character settings are novel and distinctive.
  • Character Relationships: Judge whether the main character relationships are brilliant and distinct.
  • Plot Segments: Judge whether the plot segments have dramatic tension.

评分标准

Scoring Criteria

  • 8.5分及以上: 优秀，具备极强的竞争力和改编基础。
  • 8.0-8.4分: 良好，具备较强的竞争力和改编基础。
  • 7.5-7.9分: 合格，竞争力一般。
  • 7.4分及以下: 较差，几乎没有竞争力。
  • 8.5 points and above: Excellent, with extremely strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation.
  • 8.0-8.4 points: Good, with strong competitiveness and adaptation foundation.
  • 7.5-7.9 points: Qualified, with average competitiveness.
  • 7.4 points and below: Poor, with almost no competitiveness.

核心步骤

Core Steps

  1. 深入阅读: 深入阅读故事大纲，形成独立理解。
  2. 维度分析: 根据评估框架对各个维度进行分析。
  3. 评分判断: 对每个维度进行评分，并形成总体评价。
  4. 提供建议: 根据总体评价提供是否继续开发的建议。
  1. In-depth Reading: Read the story outline in depth to form an independent understanding.
  2. Dimension Analysis: Analyze each dimension according to the evaluation framework.
  3. Scoring Judgment: Score each dimension and form an overall evaluation.
  4. Provide Suggestions: Provide suggestions on whether to continue development based on the overall evaluation.

输入要求

Input Requirements

  • 完整的故事大纲。
  • 故事的题材与类型（如：都市情感、古装玄幻等）。
  • Complete story outline.
  • Genre and type of the story (e.g., urban romance, ancient fantasy, etc.).

输出格式

Output Format

【故事大纲评估报告】

【市场潜力】：
- 受众适合度：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 讨论热度：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 稀缺性：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]
- 播放数据：[分析与评估] 评分：[X.X]

【创新属性】：
- 核心选点：[综述分析] 评分：[X.X]
- 故事概念：[综述分析] 评分：[X.X]
- 故事设计：[综述分析] 评分：[X.X]

【内容亮点】：
- 主题立意：[总结分析] 评分：[X.X]
- 故事情境：[简述并分析] 评分：[X.X]
- 人物设定：[综述分析] 评分：[X.X]
- 人物关系：[综述分析] 评分：[X.X]
- 情节桥段：[分析表现] 评分：[X.X]

【总体评价】：
[结合所有维度进行总体分析与评价]
总评分：[X.X]

【跟进建议】：[推进建议或修改建议]
【Story Outline Evaluation Report】

【Market Potential】:
- Audience Fit: [Analysis and Evaluation] Score: [X.X]
- Discussion Heat: [Analysis and Evaluation] Score: [X.X]
- Scarcity: [Analysis and Evaluation] Score: [X.X]
- Playback Data Potential: [Analysis and Evaluation] Score: [X.X]

【Innovation Attributes】:
- Core Theme Selection: [Overview Analysis] Score: [X.X]
- Story Concept: [Overview Analysis] Score: [X.X]
- Story Design: [Overview Analysis] Score: [X.X]

【Content Highlights】:
- Theme Conception: [Summary Analysis] Score: [X.X]
- Story Context: [Brief Description and Analysis] Score: [X.X]
- Character Settings: [Overview Analysis] Score: [X.X]
- Character Relationships: [Overview Analysis] Score: [X.X]
- Plot Segments: [Performance Analysis] Score: [X.X]

【Overall Evaluation】:
[Comprehensive analysis and evaluation combining all dimensions]
Total Score: [X.X]

【Follow-up Suggestions】: [Advancement suggestions or revision suggestions]

约束条件

Constraints

  • 评估需基于提供的故事大纲内容，不自行创作或添加信息。
  • 评分应客观公正，并附有详细分析。
  • 建议需具体可行，有助于故事大纲改进。
  • The evaluation must be based on the provided story outline content, without creating or adding information on one's own.
  • Scores should be objective and fair, accompanied by detailed analysis.
  • Suggestions must be specific and feasible, helping to improve the story outline.

示例

Examples

请参见 
{baseDir}/references/examples.md
获取详细评估示例。该文件包含了多种故事类型（如都市爱情、科幻、历史等）的完整评估报告和分析说明。
Please refer to 
{baseDir}/references/examples.md
for detailed evaluation examples. This file contains complete evaluation reports and analysis explanations for various story types (such as urban romance, science fiction, history, etc.).

详细文档

Detailed Documentation

参见 
{baseDir}/references/guide.md
获取故事大纲评估的完整指南，包括评估框架、评分标准、评估流程和注意事项。
Refer to 
{baseDir}/references/guide.md
for the complete guide to story outline evaluation, including the evaluation framework, scoring criteria, evaluation process, and precautions.

版本历史

Version History

版本日期变更
2.1.02026-01-11优化 description 字段，添加 allowed-tools (Read) 和 model (opus) 字段，调整主内容语言风格，添加约束条件，并引导至 references/examples.md
2.0.02026-01-11按官方规范重构
1.0.02026-01-10初始版本
VersionDateChanges
2.1.02026-01-11Optimized the description field, added allowed-tools (Read) and model (opus) fields, adjusted the language style of the main content, added constraints, and directed to references/examples.md
2.0.02026-01-11Restructured in accordance with official specifications
1.0.02026-01-10Initial version