Codex Delegate
You are the orchestrator. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate
implementer — the OpenAI Codex CLI — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write
the brief and own the judgment; Codex does the typing in its own sandbox; you verify and commit.
Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell
command and read a file, so it works the same whether you are Claude Code, OpenCode with a selected
model, or any comparable agent. (It is designed for and run on Claude Code; treat other orchestrators
as designed-for, not yet proven.)
When NOT to use this
- The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it.
- The CLI is not installed or not authenticated (run ).
- You want to write the code yourself, or you only need a review (use Codex's own command).
Prerequisites (check once)
- succeeds. If not, install () and .
- Confirm which is on PATH. Multiple installs are common (e.g. a current npm/nvm copy and
a stale Homebrew one). shows the active one and its version —
an old binary predates flags this skill relies on (, , ). The
relay also records the version it ran into , so a stale binary is visible after the fact.
- You are in (or will point at) the target git repository.
The loop
Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.
1. Write the brief
Codex sees only the text you send — no repo memory, no chat history, no shared context. Everything the
task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched,
the project's actual gate commands (discover them from the repo's CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/Makefile —
do not assume), and a report contract. Tell Codex it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per
brief. Full guidance and a template: references/writing-the-brief.md.
2. Dispatch
Send the brief to Codex with the bundled helper. It wraps
, captures the run, and writes a
structured
— so your only job is "run a command, read a file." (
below is
this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this
, i.e. the directory you loaded
the skill from. Claude Code prints it as "Base directory for this skill" when the skill loads; on other
orchestrators use that same directory — if unsure where it landed, run
find ~ -name relay.mjs -path '*codex-delegate*'
and substitute the directory above it.)
bash
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# read-only (review/diagnosis, no edits): add --read-only
# continue the exact Codex session: add --session <threadId> (from result.json; send only the delta brief)
# fallback when no thread id is available: add --resume-last
# hard time limit (watchdog): add --timeout 2h (default: off; implementation runs routinely need 1-2h)
# so you can attach a watcher later: add --out-dir .codex-runs/<task-slug> (see step 3)
# see all options: node .../relay.mjs --help
The helper defaults to a write-capable (
) sandbox and writes its artifacts to a temp
dir, so the repo under review stays clean. It
never commits — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the
shape:
references/dispatch-and-poll.md.
3. Watch it work, and wait for completion
A delegated run is not a black box. The relay renders
one readable line per Codex event to stderr as
it happens — messages, each command with its exit code, every file edit — so progress shows up
wherever your orchestrator surfaces command output. Nothing to enable;
turns it off.
[ 6s] ▸ I'll update `math.js` in place, then run the exact verification command.
[ 9s] $ sed -n '1,200p' math.js && git status --short -- math.js
[ 9s] ✓ exit 0 · return a + b; }
[ 12s] ✎ update math.js
[ 16s] $ node -e "import('./math.js').then(m=>console.log(m.multiply(3,4)))"
[ 16s] ✓ exit 0 · result 12
[ 18s] turn complete in 60558 · out 378 · cached 50176
Progress goes to
stderr and the run summary to
stdout, so a script parsing stdout is
unaffected. Add
for the model's reasoning summaries (verbose).
When the run is backgrounded, its stderr is somewhere you are not looking. Attach to it instead —
renders the same view from the run's
, live, and exits when
lands:
bash
node "<skill-dir>/scripts/watch.mjs" --dir <out-dir> --root /path/to/repo
This needs a
known on the dispatch — the default is a random temp directory that
nothing can find afterwards. Pass one whenever you intend to watch (
then finds the newest
run under
, default
).
Put the watcher on a screen, not in your context. A human watches it in a second pane; an
orchestrator should not pipe it into the conversation. Platform recipes are in
references/dispatch-and-poll.md —
works everywhere including headless boxes over SSH.
Then wait, using whatever your orchestrator offers:
- Claude Code: run the Bash call with ; you are notified on completion,
and the relay's stream is captured in the task's output file to read on demand. Do not point a
at the watcher: Monitor turns every stdout line into a conversation message, and a normal
run emits a line per command, so it floods the session. Monitor is for signals you would act on — if
you want one, filter to those:
node .../watch.mjs --dir <d> | grep --line-buffered -E '✗|error|turn failed'
.
- Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks (you will see the stream
directly), or background it and poll the result file — in bash/zsh (including Git Bash/WSL),
or your shell's equivalent ( in PowerShell, in cmd). The run is done when
exists with a . (A pre-run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead
exits with code 2 and a stderr message and writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A
missing binary exits 127 but does write a with status .)
Watching is for visibility, not verification: the stream shows what Codex did, and step 4 still
decides whether it was right.
Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when
is written and the
process has exited. Read the working tree, not a status line. The implementer's full report is
the
field in
(also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).
4. Review — do not trust the self-report
Codex's
includes its own summary and gate claims.
Re-verify, don't accept:
- Re-run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1). Never take
"gates passed" on faith.
- Read the diff against the brief: did Codex do what was asked, nothing more (scope creep) and
nothing less? in the result is your starting point.
- Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed (clean-code-guard,
test-guard, etc. from ) — this skill produces the work; those skills judge it.
- For schema/migration changes, round-trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references.
Full checklist: references/review-and-land.md.
5. Land it
Because Codex's sandbox cannot reliably write
(it varies by version, OS, and path),
the
orchestrator commits. Only after the gates pass and the diff holds:
- Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message.
- If it needs changes, send a delta brief with from the prior
(use only when no thread id is available), and review again.
Read-only second opinions
The relay doubles as a clean way to get an adversarial second opinion with no write risk: dispatch
with a brief that lists the agreed points, then each contested point with both
positions, and ask Codex to defend or concede each — deliverable in its final message, touching no
files. Any delegation skill whose implementer offers a read-only mode supports the same use, but
check how hard that mode's guarantee is first: Codex's sandbox enforces it, while Grok's is
best-effort and only flagged after the fact (
) — for those implementers,
verify
came back empty instead of assuming no edits.
Authorization model
Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing
verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract — that is the whole point. Two limits on that
mandate: surface, don't absorb (report Codex's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and
non-blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct
completion needs going beyond the brief, ask — don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment
is in references/review-and-land.md.
If you have the openai-codex plugin
The official openai-codex Claude Code plugin is excellent and
complementary —
builds on the same
CLI, it doesn't replace the plugin. They point in different directions:
- The plugin's agent is a forwarder: it hands one task to Codex and returns
the output. It deliberately does not poll, review, or commit.
- The plugin's review command and stop-review gate run the inverse direction: Codex reviews your work.
- is the orchestration loop in the other direction: you drive Codex to
implement across one task or a queue, and you review and land each result. That loop — brief →
dispatch → poll → review → commit, with the orchestrator owning the commit — is what the plugin
leaves to you, and what this skill encodes.
If you have the plugin installed, its companion CLI is an optional alternative dispatch backend; the
bundled
is the default because it adds no install of its own beyond the
binary
(Node and
, which the relay also needs, are prerequisites for every skill here).
References
- references/writing-the-brief.md — how to write a brief Codex can
execute blind: structure, XML blocks, the report contract, embedding the real gate commands.
- references/dispatch-and-poll.md — flags, the
contract, the live progress stream and , backgrounding per orchestrator,
and recovery when a run misbehaves.
- references/review-and-land.md — the review checklist, the commit
boundary, and the exact-session rework cycle.
- references/multi-task-queues.md — running a sequential queue:
carrying constraints forward, progress tracking, and the end-of-run coherence check.