"The ten issues raised are all centered on one basic principle, which is to mobilize all positive factors at home and abroad to serve the cause of socialism." —— Mao Zedong, On the Ten Major Relationships (1956)

For detailed original work basis, please refer to original-texts.md

• There is only one goal dimension, and there is no opposite side that needs to be balanced
• The user has clearly defined the trade-off direction (user decision takes priority)
• It belongs to the tactical execution stage, the general direction has been determined, and only concentrated promotion is needed —— use

  concentrate-forces

• The nature of the problem is a hard constraint of "must choose one and give up the other", and there is no room for dynamic balance

• Facing multiple mutually restrictive goals, needing to weigh trade-offs
• Finding that optimizing one dimension harms another dimension
• There are multiple stakeholders in the system that need to be coordinated
• Making choices between opposites such as speed and quality, depth and breadth, short-term and long-term
• Needing to develop a comprehensive plan that takes into account multi-faceted needs
• Finding that you are unilaterally pursuing a certain goal

Mao Zedong systematically identified ten pairs of relationships in On the Ten Major Relationships —— On the Ten Major Relationships

• Speed vs Quality
• Depth vs Breadth
• Short-term income vs Long-term value
• Simplicity vs Flexibility
• Core functions vs Additional functions
• Individual needs vs Overall interests
• Exploration and innovation vs Stability and reliability
• Centralized unification vs Decentralized autonomy
• Theoretical learning vs Practical operation
• Known solutions vs Innovative attempts

The lesson of the Soviet Union is that it was excessively biased towards one side —— On the Ten Major Relationships

• Are you only pursuing speed while ignoring quality?
• Are you only focusing on the present while ignoring the long-term?
• Are you only meeting the needs of one party while ignoring other parties?
• Are you copying other people's practices without considering your own reality?

"Overall planning and all-round consideration, appropriate arrangement" —— On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People

• Which side needs more attention at the current stage?
• After conditions change, does the balance point need to be adjusted?
• "Appropriate arrangement" —— consider "the actual possible conditions at that time and place"

1. Determine the priority side of each pair of relationships at the current stage (but do not completely ignore the other side)
2. Set specific balance indicators (how to judge that it has been out of balance?)
3. Check the balance status regularly

"Do you still want to take the detours that others have taken?" —— On the Ten Major Relationships

• Which projects failed because of unilaterally pursuing a certain dimension?
• What are the common "over-optimization" traps?
• Are there mature balance strategies that can be used for reference?

"Mobilize all positive factors at home and abroad" —— On the Ten Major Relationships

• Is there a way to advance two seemingly contradictory goals at the same time?
• Are there any neglected resources or methods that can be used?
• Is there a creative solution that can take into account multiple parties?
• The possibility of transforming "negative factors" into "positive factors"

• If speed is increased, is quality damaged?
• If depth is increased, is breadth insufficient?
• If short-term needs are met, are there hidden dangers in the long run?

1. Identify all dialectical relationship pairs, format:

   Dialectical relationships involved currently:
   1. [A] ↔ [B]: Currently biased towards [A/B/balanced], bias degree: [slight/obvious/severe]
   2. [C] ↔ [D]: Currently biased towards [C/D/balanced], bias degree: ……

2. One-sidedness check (for each pair of relationships):
   • Does the current plan/action completely ignore one side?
   • If yes: Is this a deliberate trade-off (acceptable) or an unintentional omission (needs correction)?
3. Determine the balance point of the current stage (give a specific priority direction for each pair of relationships):

   [A] vs [B]: Prioritize [A] at the current stage, but ensure [B] is not lower than [minimum requirement]
   Reason: …… (related to the specific conditions of the current stage)

4. System impact check (after adjusting a pair of relationships, check the impact on other relationships):

   If [A] is strengthened, the impact on other relationships:
   - For [C] vs [D]: [aggravate/alleviate/no impact], need to adjust……

5. Set imbalance early warning indicators:

   If [specific signal] appears, it means [A] vs [B] has been out of balance, and this skill needs to be called again

• Contradiction analysis method: The process of identifying dialectical relationship pairs is contradiction analysis
• Investigation and research: Understanding the actual situation of all parties is the premise of overall planning and all-round consideration
• Mass line: Overall planning and all-round consideration requires listening to opinions from all parties
• Concentrate forces: After the general direction is determined by overall planning, concentrate forces on specific execution points
• Persistent strategy: The balance points of different stages are different, and phased adjustment is required