Loading...
Loading...
Transform approved requirements into comprehensive technical designs. Define system architecture, component interactions, data models, and interfaces to create a blueprint for implementation.
npx skill4agent add jasonkneen/kiro design-documentation# Design Document: [Feature Name]
## Overview
[High-level summary of the feature and approach]
## Architecture
[System architecture and component overview]
## Components and Interfaces
[Detailed component descriptions and interactions]
## Data Models
[Data structures and relationships]
## Error Handling
[Error scenarios and response strategies]
## Testing Strategy
[Testing approach and quality assurance]## Research Findings
### [Topic]
**Sources:** [Links/references]
**Key Insights:**
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
**Impact on Design:** [How this affects our approach]## Architecture
### System Overview
[How the overall system works]
### Component Architecture
[Major components and their responsibilities]
### Data Flow
[How information moves through the system]
### Technology Decisions
[Key technology choices and rationale]graph TD
A[Client] --> B[API Gateway]
B --> C[Auth Service]
B --> D[Feature Service]
D --> E[Database]
D --> F[Cache]## Components and Interfaces
### [Component Name]
**Purpose:** [What this component does]
**Responsibilities:**
- [Responsibility 1]
- [Responsibility 2]
**Interfaces:**
- Input: [What it receives]
- Output: [What it produces]
- Dependencies: [What it requires]
**API Definition:**
```typescript
interface ComponentName {
method(input: InputType): Promise<OutputType>;
}
### Step 5: Define Data Models
Document all data structures:
```markdown
## Data Models
### [Entity Name]
**Purpose:** [What this entity represents]
**Properties:**
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|-------|------|----------|-------------|
| id | string | Yes | Unique identifier |
| name | string | Yes | Display name |
| createdAt | Date | Yes | Creation timestamp |
**Validation Rules:**
- [Rule 1]
- [Rule 2]
**Relationships:**
- [Relationship to other entities]
**Example:**
```json
{
"id": "abc123",
"name": "Example",
"createdAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}
### Step 6: Plan Error Handling
Document error scenarios:
```markdown
## Error Handling
### Error Categories
1. **Validation Errors:** Invalid user input
2. **Authentication Errors:** Unauthorized access
3. **External Service Errors:** Third-party failures
4. **System Errors:** Internal failures
### Error Response Strategy
| Error Type | HTTP Code | User Message | System Action |
|------------|-----------|--------------|---------------|
| Validation | 400 | Specific field error | Log, return details |
| Auth | 401 | "Please log in" | Redirect to login |
| Not Found | 404 | "Resource not found" | Log, return error |
| Server | 500 | "Something went wrong" | Log, alert, retry |
### Recovery Mechanisms
- [Retry strategies]
- [Fallback behaviors]
- [Circuit breaker patterns]## Testing Strategy
### Unit Testing
- **Coverage Target:** 80%+
- **Focus Areas:** [Critical business logic]
- **Mocking Strategy:** [What to mock]
### Integration Testing
- **Scope:** [Component interactions to test]
- **Environment:** [Test environment setup]
- **Data Strategy:** [Test data approach]
### End-to-End Testing
- **Critical Paths:** [User journeys to test]
- **Tools:** [Testing tools]
### Performance Testing
- **Load Targets:** [Expected load]
- **Benchmarks:** [Performance requirements]### Decision: [Brief Title]
**Context:** [Situation requiring a decision]
**Options Considered:**
**Option 1: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]
**Option 2: [Name]**
- Pros: [Benefits]
- Cons: [Drawbacks]
- Effort: [Low/Medium/High]
**Decision:** [Chosen option]
**Rationale:** [Why this option was selected]
**Implications:** [What this means for implementation]### Decision: API Architecture
**Options:**
1. **REST API** - Standard HTTP methods, well-understood
2. **GraphQL** - Flexible queries, single endpoint
3. **RPC-style** - Direct operation mapping
**Decision:** REST API
**Rationale:** Standard CRUD operations, team familiarity, good tooling support### Decision: Database Choice
**Options:**
1. **PostgreSQL** - ACID compliance, complex queries
2. **MongoDB** - Schema flexibility, horizontal scaling
3. **Redis** - High performance, limited queries
**Decision:** PostgreSQL with JSON columns
**Rationale:** Data consistency needs + flexibility for user preferences### Decision: Authentication Strategy
**Options:**
1. **Session-based** - Server-controlled, simple
2. **JWT tokens** - Stateless, scalable
3. **OAuth 2.0** - External provider, no password management
**Decision:** JWT with refresh token rotation
**Rationale:** Scalability requirements, API-first architecture# Design Document: User Profile Management
## Overview
Enable users to view and edit their profile information, including personal details, preferences, and profile picture.
## Architecture
### Component Architecture
### Technology Stack
- API: Node.js with Express
- Database: PostgreSQL
- Image Storage: S3-compatible object storage
- Cache: Redis for session data
## Components
### ProfileService
**Purpose:** Manage user profile CRUD operations
**Interface:**
```typescript
interface ProfileService {
getProfile(userId: string): Promise<UserProfile>;
updateProfile(userId: string, data: ProfileUpdate): Promise<UserProfile>;
uploadAvatar(userId: string, image: File): Promise<string>;
deleteAvatar(userId: string): Promise<void>;
}| Field | Type | Required | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | UUID | Yes | Auto-generated |
| string | Yes | Valid email format | |
| displayName | string | Yes | 2-50 characters |
| bio | string | No | Max 500 characters |
| avatarUrl | string | No | Valid URL |
| preferences | JSON | No | Valid JSON object |
| updatedAt | timestamp | Yes | Auto-updated |
| Scenario | Response | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Profile not found | 404 | Return error message |
| Invalid update data | 400 | Return validation errors |
| Image too large | 413 | Return size limit error |
| Unauthorized | 401 | Redirect to login |
## Next Steps
After completing design:
1. Get design review and approval
2. Move to Task Planning phase
3. Break design into implementation tasks
4. Begin systematic implementation