related-work-writing

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Related Work Writing

相关工作章节撰写

Generate publication-quality Related Work sections with proper citations and thematic organization.

生成具备规范引用和主题化结构的、达到出版级别的相关工作章节。

Input

输入内容

```
$0
```
— Current paper draft or method description
```
$1
```
— Collected literature (BibTeX entries, paper summaries, or literature review notes)

```
$0
```
— 当前论文草稿或方法描述
```
$1
```
— 收集到的文献（BibTeX条目、论文摘要或文献综述笔记）

References

参考资料

Related work writing prompts and strategies:

~/.claude/skills/related-work-writing/references/related-work-prompts.md

Workflow

工作流程

Step 1: Analyze the Paper's Contributions

步骤1：分析论文的贡献

Read the current paper draft (especially Methods and Introduction)
Identify the key contributions and novelty claims
List the technical components that need literature context

阅读当前论文草稿（尤其是方法和引言部分）
识别核心贡献与创新性声明
列出需要文献背景支撑的技术组件

Step 2: Organize Literature by Theme

步骤2：按主题组织文献

Group related papers into thematic clusters:

Each cluster should represent a research direction or technique
Common themes: problem formulation, methodology family, application domain, evaluation approach
Order themes from most to least relevant to your work

将相关论文归类为主题集群：

每个集群代表一个研究方向或技术类别
常见主题：问题定义、方法体系、应用领域、评估方法
按照与你的研究的相关性从高到低排列主题

Step 3: Write Each Theme Paragraph

步骤3：撰写各主题段落

For each thematic group:

Topic sentence — Introduce the research direction
Describe key works — Summarize 2-5 representative papers
Compare and contrast — How does each approach differ from yours?
Transition — Connect to the next theme or to your contribution

针对每个主题组：

主题句 — 介绍该研究方向
描述关键研究 — 总结2-5篇代表性论文
对比分析 — 说明每种方法与你的研究的不同之处
过渡句 — 衔接至下一个主题或你的研究贡献

Step 4: Refine

步骤4：优化完善

Ensure every cited paper has a clear reason for inclusion
Check that your work's novelty is clear from the comparisons
Verify all
```
\cite{}
```
keys exist in the
```
.bib
```
file
Aim for 1-2 pages (single column) or 0.5-1 page (double column)

确保每篇被引用的文献都有明确的引用理由
检查通过对比是否清晰体现了你的研究的创新性
验证所有
```
\cite{}
```
标识在
```
.bib
```
文件中存在
目标篇幅：单栏1-2页，或双栏0.5-1页

Rules

规则要求

Compare and contrast, don't just describe — "Unlike [X] which assumes..., our method..."
Organize by theme, not chronologically — Group by research direction
Cite broadly — Not just the most popular papers; include recent and diverse work
Be fair — Acknowledge strengths of prior work before stating limitations
Explain inapplicability — If a method could apply to your setting, explain why you don't compare experimentally, or add it to experiments
Use present tense for established facts — "Smith et al. propose..." or "This approach uses..."
End with positioning — The final paragraph should clearly position your work relative to all discussed prior work

要对比分析，而非仅描述 — "与[X]假设...不同，我们的方法..."
按主题组织，而非按时间顺序 — 按研究方向分组
广泛引用 — 不仅引用热门论文，还要涵盖近期和多样化的研究成果
保持客观公正 — 在指出前人工作的局限性之前，先认可其优势
说明不适用原因 — 如果某方法本可应用于你的研究场景，需解释为何未进行实验对比，或补充相关实验
已确立的事实使用一般现在时 — "Smith等人提出..." 或 "该方法采用..."
结尾明确定位 — 最后一段需清晰定位你的研究与所有讨论过的前人工作的关系