Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Constraint-Based Creativity Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Understand the problem and context
- [ ] Step 2: Choose or design strategic constraints
- [ ] Step 3: Generate ideas within constraints
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate and refine solutions
- [ ] Step 5: Validate quality and deliver
Step 1: Understand the problem and context
Ask user for the creative challenge (what needs solving), current state (what's been tried, why it's not working), ideal outcome (success criteria), and any existing constraints (real limitations already in place). Understanding why ideas feel stale or stuck helps identify which constraints will unlock creativity. See
Constraint Types for strategic options.
Step 2: Choose or design strategic constraints
If user has existing constraints (tight budget, short timeline, limited materials) → Use resources/template.md to work within them creatively. If no constraints exist and ideation is stuck → Study resources/methodology.md to design strategic constraints that force new thinking patterns. Choose 1-3 constraints maximum to avoid over-constraining.
Step 3: Generate ideas within constraints
Apply chosen constraints rigorously during ideation. Create
constraint-based-creativity.md
file documenting: problem statement, active constraints (what's forbidden/required/limited), idea generation process, and all ideas produced (including "failed" attempts that revealed insights). Quantity matters - aim for 20+ ideas before evaluating. See
resources/template.md for structured generation process.
Step 4: Evaluate and refine solutions
Assess ideas using dual criteria: (1) Does it satisfy all constraints? (2) Does it solve the original problem? Select strongest 2-3 ideas. Refine by combining elements, removing unnecessary complexity, and strengthening the constraint-driven insight. Document why certain ideas stand out - often the constraint reveals an unexpected angle. See resources/methodology.md for evaluation frameworks.
Step 5: Validate quality and deliver
Self-assess using
resources/evaluators/rubric_constraint_based_creativity.json. Verify: constraints were genuinely respected (not bent/broken), solutions are novel (not slight variations of existing), the constraint created the creativity (solution wouldn't exist without it), ideas are actionable (not just conceptual), and creative insight is explained (why this constraint unlocked this idea). Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5. Present completed
constraint-based-creativity.md
file highlighting the constraint-driven breakthroughs.
复制以下清单并跟踪进度:
Constraint-Based Creativity Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Understand the problem and context
- [ ] Step 2: Choose or design strategic constraints
- [ ] Step 3: Generate ideas within constraints
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate and refine solutions
- [ ] Step 5: Validate quality and deliver
步骤1:理解问题与背景
向用户了解创意挑战(需要解决的问题)、当前状态(已尝试的方法及无效原因)、理想成果(成功标准),以及任何已存在的约束(已有的实际限制)。理解思路为何陈旧或陷入僵局,有助于确定哪些约束能解锁创意。可查看
约束类型获取策略选项。
步骤2:选择或设计策略性约束
如果用户已有约束(紧张预算、短周期、有限物料)→ 使用resources/template.md在约束内开展创意工作。如果无约束但构思陷入僵局→ 研究resources/methodology.md设计策略性约束,迫使团队形成新的思考模式。最多选择1-3项约束,避免过度限制。
步骤3:在约束内生成思路
在构思阶段严格执行选定的约束。创建
constraint-based-creativity.md
文件,记录:问题陈述、生效约束(禁止/要求/限制的内容)、思路生成过程,以及所有产出的想法(包括能带来洞察的“失败”尝试)。数量至关重要——评估前需产出20个以上的想法。可查看
resources/template.md获取结构化生成流程。
步骤4:评估与优化解决方案
通过双重标准评估思路:(1) 是否满足所有约束?(2) 是否解决了原始问题?选出最优质的2-3个思路。通过整合元素、去除不必要的复杂性、强化约束驱动的洞察来优化方案。记录某些思路脱颖而出的原因——通常约束会揭示意想不到的角度。可查看resources/methodology.md获取评估框架。
步骤5:验证质量并交付
使用
resources/evaluators/rubric_constraint_based_creativity.json进行自我评估。验证:约束是否真正得到遵守(未被违背/打破)、解决方案是否新颖(并非现有方案的微小变体)、约束是否催生了创意(无约束则不会产生该方案)、思路是否可落地(而非仅停留在概念层面)、创意洞察是否得到阐释(为何该约束能解锁此思路)。最低标准:平均得分≥3.5。提交完整的
constraint-based-creativity.md
文件,突出由约束驱动的突破性成果。